Literature DB >> 30887182

Visceral obesity and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection.

Niklas Nygaard Baastrup1, Jan Kim Christensen2, Kristian Kiim Jensen3, Lars Nannestad Jørgensen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complications after rectal resection are frequent. Recently, methods to assess visceral obesity (VO) have become available as an alternative to measurement of body mass index (BMI). The aim of this study was to examine the association between visceral fat volume (VFV) and the short-term outcomes after laparoscopic low anterior resection (LLAR) in patients with rectal cancer.
METHODS: We studied a consecutive series of patients undergoing LLAR at Bispebjerg University Hospital from 01.01.2013 to 01.01.2016. Preoperative VFV was calculated from abdominal CT scans using an automatic segmentation tool. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage (AL). Secondary outcomes included conversion to open surgery, number of lymph nodes harvested, the rates of 30-day complications as well as reoperations, and 1-year survival.
RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included. VO was defined as a VFV above the 75 percentile. Thirteen (12.7%) patients developed AL, four (15.4%) of whom were in the VO group (p = 0.900). At least one postoperative complication developed in 38 (37.3%) patients, with no significant difference between the VO and non-VO patients after univariable analysis (42.3% vs. 35.4%, p = 0.702) or multivariable adjustment (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.38-2.65, p = 0.984). VO was significantly associated with an increased incidence of conversion to open surgery (OR 4.30, 95% CI 1.29-14.86, p = 0.018). There was a significant difference in the number of harvested lymph nodes between the two groups (mean 23.5 vs. 29.1, p = 0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study on patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection, VO was not associated with development of AL or other complications. However, we found that visceral obesity was associated with an increased risk of conversion to open surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Body mass index; Laparoscopic surgery; Postoperative complications; Rectal cancer; Visceral obesity

Year:  2019        PMID: 30887182     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06748-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  [Long-term oncological results after laparoscopic, converted and primary open procedures for rectal carcinoma. Results of a multicenter observational study].

Authors:  H Ptok; R Steinert; F Meyer; K-P Kröll; C Scheele; F Köckerling; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; Pascal Gervaz; Michelle Secic; Pascal Bucher; Béatrice Mugnier-Konrad; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; Jürgen Weitz; Werner Hohenberger; Richard J Heald; Brendan Moran; Alexis Ulrich; Torbjörn Holm; W Douglas Wong; Emmanuel Tiret; Yoshihiro Moriya; Søren Laurberg; Marcel den Dulk; Cornelis van de Velde; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 5.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Breukink; J Pierie; T Wiggers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

Review 6.  Preoperative prediction of conversion from laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery: a clinical study of conversion scoring of laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery.

Authors:  Guang-Dong Zhang; Xu-Ting Zhi; Jian-Li Zhang; Guang-Bo Bu; Gang Ma; Kai-Lei Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A novel method of measuring intra-abdominal fat volume using helical computed tomography.

Authors:  J Kobayashi; N Tadokoro; M Watanabe; M Shinomiya
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2002-03

8.  [The completeness and quality of the Danish Colorectal Cancer clinical database on colorectal cancer].

Authors:  Thomas N Nickelsen; Henrik Harling; Ole Kronborg; Steffen Bülow; Torben Jørgensen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2004-08-30

9.  Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy.

Authors:  Eduardo M Targarona; Carmen Balague; Juan Carlos Pernas; Carmen Martinez; Rene Berindoague; Ignasi Gich; Manuel Trias
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  After-hours colorectal surgery: a risk factor for anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Niels Komen; Jan-Willem Dijk; Zarina Lalmahomed; Karel Klop; Wim Hop; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Hans Jeekel; W Ruud Schouten; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of Body Composition During Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Complications, Survival and Tumor Response in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Liu; Siyi Lu; Yuxia Wang; Xinyi Lin; Peng Ran; Xin Zhou; Wei Fu; Hao Wang
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-01-27

2.  The associations between lipid profiles and visceral obesity among gastrointestinal cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bo Gao; Xiangrui Li; Chao Ding; Xiaotian Chen; Wenqing Chen; Shu'an Wang; Jian He; Yu Liu
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.