Literature DB >> 3088646

Similar effects of antidepressant and non-antidepressant drugs on behavior under an interresponse-time greater than 72-s schedule.

G T Pollard, J L Howard.   

Abstract

Antidepressant drugs were reported to decrease responses and increase reinforcements in water-deprived male albino rats pressing a lever for water on a schedule requiring a pause of at least 72 s between responses (IRT greater than 72). Subsequently other investigators, using food-deprived ovariectomized hooded rats pressing a lever for food, showed that antipsychotic drugs produced the same effect as antidepressants. Because methodologies differed somewhat, the present study was designed to replicate closely the experimental conditions of the original studies, e.g., same strain and sex, same reinforcer, similar baseline behavior. In this study the antidepressant imipramine, the antipsychotics chlorpromazine and haloperidol, and to some extent the anxiolytic buspirone produced qualitatively similar effects - decreased responses and increased reinforcements - although there were some quantitative differences. This result, and other results showing that some antidepressants increase responses and decrease reinforcements, suggest that the IRT greater than 72-s task lacks specificity as a screening method for antidepressants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3088646     DOI: 10.1007/bf00310639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  10 in total

1.  Timing behavior during prolonged treatment with dl-amphetamine.

Authors:  C R SCHUSTER; J ZIMMERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of meprobamate on operant behavior in rats.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; W FRY; J DEEGAN; L COOK
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  The Geller-Seifter conflict paradigm with incremental shock.

Authors:  G T Pollard; J L Howard
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-04-11       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Differential effects of chlordiazepoxide and d-amphetamine on responding maintained by a DRL schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  D J Sanger; M Key; D E Blackman
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1974

5.  Effects of monoamine oxidase inhibitors on performance during differential reinforcement of low response rate.

Authors:  J M O'Donnell; L S Seiden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Altered effects of desipramine on operant performance after 6-hydroxydopamine-induced depletion of brain dopamine or norepinephrine.

Authors:  J M O'Donnell; L S Seiden
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  The effects of tranquillizing drugs on timing behaviour in rats.

Authors:  D J Sanger; D E Blackman
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1975-10-31

8.  Differential effects of imipramine in rats as a function of DRL schedule value.

Authors:  P S McGuire; L S Seiden
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Behavioral screen for antidepressants: the effects of drugs and electroconvulsive shock on performance under a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule.

Authors:  L S Seiden; J L Dahms; R A Shaughnessy
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-second schedule: selective effects of antidepressant drugs.

Authors:  J M O'Donnell; L S Seiden
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.030

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Effects of desipramine and fluvoxamine on timing behavior investigated with the fixed-interval peak procedure and the interval bisection task.

Authors:  M Y Ho; S S al-Zahrani; D N Velazquez Martinez; M Lopez Cabrera; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Interaction between antidepressants and d-amphetamine on variable-interval performance.

Authors:  K Shah; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Selective inhibition of MAO-A, not MAO-B, results in antidepressant-like effects on DRL 72-s behavior.

Authors:  G J Marek; L S Seiden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  The alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonists idazoxan and yohimbine increase rates of DRL responding in rats.

Authors:  D J Sanger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Effects of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital, buspirone, chlorpromazine, and morphine in the stretched attend posture (SAP) test.

Authors:  G T Pollard; J L Howard
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Can the DRL 72s schedule selectively reveal antidepressant drug activity?

Authors:  A Jackson; W Koek; F C Colpaert
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Effects of salbutamol upon performance on an operant screen for antidepressants.

Authors:  R T Dunn; J B Richards; L S Seiden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Flesinoxan shows antidepressant activity in a DRL 72-s screen.

Authors:  A van Hest; M van Drimmelen; B Olivier
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Comparison of the effects of mianserin and its enantiomers and metabolites on a behavioral screen for antidepressant activity.

Authors:  T H Hand; G J Marek; L S Seiden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.