Literature DB >> 8815964

Effects of desipramine and fluvoxamine on timing behavior investigated with the fixed-interval peak procedure and the interval bisection task.

M Y Ho1, S S al-Zahrani, D N Velazquez Martinez, M Lopez Cabrera, C M Bradshaw, E Szabadi.   

Abstract

Acute treatment with antidepressant drugs is known to increase the mean interresponse time (IRT) in the IRT > 72-s schedule of reinforcement. In order to examine the possibility that this effect may reflect an action of the antidepressants on timing processes, we tested the effects of two antidepressants, desipramine and fluvoxamine, on behaviour maintained under two other timing schedules in rats. In the fixed-interval peak procedure (fixed-interval 30-s), acute treatment with desipramine (8 mg kg-1) reduced response rate, whereas acute treatment with fluvoxamine (8 mg kg-1) increased it. Neither drug significantly altered the time to attainment of peak response rate or the Weber fraction. In the interval bisection task (standard durations 2 s and 8 s), the bisection point was not significantly altered by acute treatment with either drug. Chronic treatment with desipramine (8 mg kg-1 b.d.) had no effect on any of the indices of timing under either schedule. Chronic treatment with fluvoxamine (8 mg kg-1 b.d.) reduced the time to attainment of peak response rate but had no effect on the Weber fraction under the fixed-interval peak procedure, and did not alter the bisection point or Weber fraction under the interval bisection procedure. The failure of desipramine and fluvoxamine to increase the time to peak response rate or the bisection point at doses that significantly altered operant response rate suggests that the effect of these drugs on IRT schedule performance is unlikely to reflect an interaction with timing processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8815964     DOI: 10.1007/bf02247339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  31 in total

1.  The action of imipramine, amitriptyline, doxepin and butriptyline in an operant conditioning schedule.

Authors:  L Molinengo; S Ricci-Gamalero
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1972

2.  The relative effects of d-amphetamine, imipramine and harmaline on tetrabenazine suppression of schedule-controlled behavior in the rat.

Authors:  J W McKearney
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Selective inhibition of MAO-A, not MAO-B, results in antidepressant-like effects on DRL 72-s behavior.

Authors:  G J Marek; L S Seiden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Action of antidepressants, stimulants and depressants in the transition from a fixed ratio to a fixed interval schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  A Fundarò; M C Cassone; L Molinengo
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.067

5.  Isolation of an internal clock.

Authors:  S Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-07

6.  Motivational and response factors in temporal differentiation.

Authors:  J R Platt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Differential effects of imipramine in rats as a function of DRL schedule value.

Authors:  P S McGuire; L S Seiden
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Fluoxetine prevents the disruptive effects of fenfluramine on differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-second schedule performance.

Authors:  J B Richards; K E Sabol; L S Seiden
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Effect of lesions of the ascending 5-hydroxytryptaminergic pathways on timing behaviour investigated with the fixed-interval peak procedure.

Authors:  G Morrissey; M Y Ho; M A Wogar; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Methamphetamine and time estimation.

Authors:  A V Maricq; S Roberts; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Impulsive responding on the peak-interval procedure.

Authors:  Matthew S Matell; George S Portugal
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Dissociations between interval timing and intertemporal choice following administration of fluoxetine, cocaine, or methamphetamine.

Authors:  Sarah R Heilbronner; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Blockade of Catecholamine Reuptake in the Prelimbic Cortex Decreases Top-down Attentional Control in Response to Novel, but Not Familiar Appetitive Distracters, within a Timing Paradigm.

Authors:  Alexander R Matthews; Mona Buhusi; Catalin V Buhusi
Journal:  NeuroSci       Date:  2020-12-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.