| Literature DB >> 30883028 |
Chundi Gao1, Jing Zhuang2,3, Chao Zhou2,3, Huayao Li1, Cun Liu4, Lijuan Liu2,3, Fubin Feng2,3, Ruijuan Liu2,3, Changgang Sun2,3.
Abstract
Advances in cancer biology have allowed early diagnosis and more comprehensive treatment of breast cancer (BC). However, it remains the most common cause of cancer death in women worldwide because of its strong invasiveness and metastasis. In-depth study of the molecular pathogenesis of BC and of relevant prognostic markers would improve the quality of life and prognosis of patients. In this study, bioinformatics analysis of SNP-related data from BC patients provided in the TCGA database revealed that six mutant genes (NCOR1, GATA3, CDH1, ATM, AKT1, and PTEN) were significantly associated with the corresponding expression levels of the proteins. The proteins were involved in multiple pathways related to the development of cancer, including the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, pertinent microRNAs, and the MAPK signaling pathway. In addition, overall survival and recurrence-free survival analysis revealed the close associations of the expression of GATA3, NCOR1, CDH1, and ATM with survival of BC patients. Therefore, detecting these gene mutations and exploring their corresponding expression could be valuable in predicting the prognosis of patients. The results of the high-throughput data mining provide important fundamental bioinformatics information and a relevant theoretical basis for further exploring the molecular pathogenesis of BC and assessing the prognosis of patients.Entities:
Keywords: bioinformatics analysis; biomarkers; breast cancer; prognosis; single nucleotide polymorphisms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30883028 PMCID: PMC6537087 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.711
Figure 1A waterfall map of 20 genes that mutated in more than 50 samples. (A)mutated gene, (B)tanslational effect, and (C)mutation type
Figure 2The volcano diagram about differentially expresses mRNAs. Red dots represent up‐regulated mRNA and green dots represent down‐regulated mRNA
Figure 3Pathways enrichment map of 517 mutant genes. The top 20 terms with the lowest P value were selected. Count: the number of enriched genes in each term
Gene ontology analysis of 517 mutant genes in breast cancer
| Category | Term | Count |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| GOTERM_BP_DIRECT | Positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter | 45 | 0.001617 |
| cell adhesion | 38 | 1.04E‐08 | |
| Negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter | 32 | 0.0132158 | |
| positive regulation of GTPase activity | 28 | 0.0055662 | |
| Positive regulation of transcription, DNA‐templated | 27 | 0.0031846 | |
| Negative regulation of transcription, DNA‐templated | 25 | 0.0080431 | |
| Protein phosphorylation | 23 | 0.0104001 | |
| Extracellular matrix organization | 22 | 1.72E‐07 | |
| Homophilic cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules | 20 | 1.08E‐07 | |
| Axon guidance | 20 | 1.20E‐07 | |
| GOTERM_MF_DIRECT | ATP binding | 105 | 1.15E‐20 |
| Protein binding | 263 | 0.0032137 | |
| Calcium ion binding | 61 | 2.12E‐15 | |
| DNA binding | 57 | 0.0413412 | |
| Zinc ion binding | 45 | 0.0120743 | |
| Calmodulin binding | 34 | 4.72E‐18 | |
| ATPase activity | 31 | 1.06E‐15 | |
| Identical protein binding | 31 | 0.0166445 | |
| Actin binding | 30 | 3.42E‐10 | |
| Protein serine/threonine kinase activity | 23 | 4.75E‐04 | |
| GOTERM_CC_DIRECT | Cytoplasm | 189 | 7.46E‐06 |
| Plasma membrane | 158 | 2.82E‐06 | |
| Cytosol | 108 | 0.0361671 | |
| Extracellular exosome | 107 | 3.03E‐04 | |
| Nucleoplasm | 98 | 0.0066943 | |
| Membrane | 93 | 2.12E‐05 | |
| Microtubule | 32 | 6.15E‐10 | |
| Cell junction | 31 | 1.13E‐05 | |
| Perinuclear region of cytoplasm | 27 | 0.0221612 | |
| Z disc | 26 | 1.22E‐15 |
Top 10 terms were selected according to count and P value <0.05. Count: the number of enriched genes in each term.
Figure 4The PPI network of the 517 mutant genes in breast cancer
Figure 5The relationship between mutation and expression about six genes
Figure 6The relationship between mutation sites and corresponding gene expression of AKT1, CDH1, and GATA3
Figure 7Kaplan‐Meier survival curves of the mutant genes. (A‐D) The OS curves of the mutant genes, (E‐H) The RFS curves of the mutant genes