| Literature DB >> 30882907 |
Barbara Veselka1, Megan B Brickley2, Lori D'Ortenzio2, Bonnie Kahlon2, Menno L P Hoogland1, Andrea L Waters-Rist3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study investigates vitamin D deficiency patterns in individuals from birth to the beginning of adolescence. Microscopic computed tomography (micro-CT) evaluation of interglobular dentine (IGD) in teeth provides information on the age of disease onset and the number of deficient periods per individual, which will increase our understanding of factors influencing vitamin D deficiency prevalence, including sociocultural practices and latitude.Entities:
Keywords: Western Europe; interglobular dentine; residual rickets; rickets; seasonality
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30882907 PMCID: PMC6593783 DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Phys Anthropol ISSN: 0002-9483 Impact factor: 2.868
Figure 1Location of Beemster and Hattem in the Netherlands
Overview of analyzed individuals with their sex, age, sampled tooth, macroscopic vitamin D deficiency, number of IGD periods, and the age of IGD formation
| Individual | Macro‐scopy | Micro‐CT | Histology | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site/ID# | Sex | Age‐at‐death (years) | Tooth sampled | Category | N IGD periods | Age (period of deficiency) | N IGD periods | Grade | Age (period of deficiency) |
| HT15S020 | U | 15 ± 2 | RM1 | Possible | 0 | – | 1 | 1 | 6–12 mths. |
| HT15S042 | M | 36–49 | LM1 | Present | 1 | 2.5 yrs. | 1 | 2 | 2.5 yrs. |
| HT15S062 | F | 36–49 | LM1 | Present | 0 | – | 0 | – | – |
| HT15S066 | M | 36–49 | LM1 | Present | 1 | 6–12 mths. | NA | – | – |
| HT15S067 | U | 6.5 ± 0.5 | LM1 | Present | 2 | 6–12 mths. | NA | – | – |
| 2.5 yrs. | |||||||||
| HT15S071 | M | 18–25 | RM1 | Present | 0 | – | 0 | – | – |
| HT15S075 | F | 36–49 | LC1 | Present | U | U | 3 | 2 and 3 | 2.5 yrs. 5 yrs. 6 yrs. |
| HT15S080 | M | 26–35 | RM1 | Present | 2 | 6–12 mths. | NA | – | – |
| 2.5 yrs. | |||||||||
| HT15S094 | F | 18–25 | RM1 | Present | 2 | 6–12 mths. | 2 | 2 | 6–12 mths. 2.5 yrs. |
| 3 yrs. | |||||||||
| HT15S099 | F | 18–25 | LM1 | Present | 0 | – | 1 | 1–2 | 6–12 mths. |
| HT15S106 | M | 36–49 | RM1 | Present | 1 | 6–12 mths. | NA | – | – |
| HT15S109 | F | 36–49 | RM1 | Present | 0 | – | 1 | 1–2 | 2.5 yrs. |
| HT15S123 | U | 2 ± 0.5 | RM1 | Present | 1 | 6–12 mths. | NA | – | – |
| HT15S127 | U | 9 ± 1 | RM1 | Present | 2 | Birth | NA | – | – |
| 6–12 mths. | |||||||||
| HT15S130 | M | 18–25 | RC1 | Present | 4 | 12 mths. | 6 | 2 and 3 | 1.5 yrs. 2 yrs. 2.5 yrs. 3.5 yrs. 6.5 yrs. 7.5 yrs. |
| 2.5 yrs. | |||||||||
| 3 yrs. | |||||||||
| 5 yrs. | |||||||||
| MB11S101 | F | 26–35 | RM1 | Present | 2 | 6–12 mths. | 3 | 2 and 3 | 6–12 mths. 2 yrs. 3 yrs. |
| 2.5 yrs. | |||||||||
| MB11S126 | F | 36–49 | RM1 | Possible | 0 | – | 1 | 1–2 | Birth – 12 mths. |
| MB11S183 | F | 26–35 | LM1 | Present | 0 | – | 1 | 1–2 | 6–12 mths. |
| MB11S234 | F | 18–25 | RM1 | Present | 0 | – | 1 | 2–3 | 6–12 mths. |
| MB11S307 | F | 18–25 | RM1 | Present | 4 | Birth | 4 | 2 and 3 | 1 yr. 2 yrs. 3 yrs. 5 yrs. |
| 6–12 mths. | |||||||||
| 2.5 yrs. | |||||||||
| 5 yrs. | |||||||||
| MB11S321 | M | 50+ | RM1 | Present | 0 | – | 0 | – | – |
| MB11S327 | F | 26–35 | RM1 | Present | 2 | 6–12 mths. | NA | – | – |
| 2.5 yrs. | |||||||||
| MB11S401 | F | 26–35 | LC1 | Present | 2 | 2.5 yrs. | NA | – | – |
| 3 yrs. | |||||||||
| MB11S413 | F | 36–49 | LM1 | Possible | 1 | 6–12 mths. | NA | – | – |
| MB11S420 | F | 26–35 | RM1 | Present | 1 | 2.5 yrs. | 2 | 2–3 | 6–12 mths. 2.5 yrs. |
| MB11S422 | F | 36–49 | RM1 | Present | 1 | Birth – 12 mths. | NA | – | – |
| MB11S427 | M | 26–35 | RM1 | Present | 1 | 6–12 mths. | NA | – | – |
| MB11S437 | F | 26–35 | LM1 | Present | 2 | 6–12 mths. | NA | – | – |
| 2.5 yrs. | |||||||||
| MB11S488 | F | 36–49 | RM1 | Present | 1 | 2.5 yrs. | NA | – | – |
| MB11S498 | F | 50+ | LC1 | Present | 0 | – | 1 | 1–2 | 2.5 yrs. |
Data from Veselka et al. (2015, 2018) and Veselka (2019).
Age is based on Moorrees, Fanning, and Hunt (1963) and Massler, Schour, and Poncher (1941), age periods are approximate. U = unobservable, M = male, F = female, RM1 = right first permanent maxillary molar, LM1 = left first permanent maxillary molar, RM1 = right first permanent mandibular molar, LM1 = left first permanent mandibular molar, RC1 = right permanent maxillary canine, LC1 = left permanent maxillary canine, LC1 = left permanent mandibular canine, mths. = months, yrs. = years (all ages approximate), HT15 = Hattem, MB11 = Beemster, IGD = interglobular dentine, NA = not assessed.
Figure 2HT15S067 shows 2 episodes of IGD (a and b), visible in the schematic drawing, the micro‐CT scan in craniocaudal view, and both episodes in transverse view marked by white arrows
Figure 3Craniocaudal micro‐CT image of the right permanent maxillary canine (RC1) of individual HT15S130 with corresponding transverse image of each IGD episode marked by white arrows, and a thin section image at 40x magnification of the same tooth with each of the IGD episodes shown separately
Figure 4Craniocaudal image of left maxillary canine of HT15S075 via micro‐CT (LC1). It was not possible to distinguish cracks and diagenetic degradation from bands of IGD. The histological image of the same tooth permits the observation of three IGD bands, marked as a, c, and c at 40× magnification