| Literature DB >> 30882686 |
Liang Li1, Bing Xue2, Qiang Zhao1, Hong-Qiang Xie1, Xue-Rong Luan1, Qing Cui1.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to observe the curative effect of long intestinal tube (LT) in the treatment of phytobezoar intestinal obstruction.We performed a retrospective study of patients with phytobezoar intestinal obstruction who underwent decompression with different tube insertion method. A total of 80 patients were collected and divided into nasogastric tube (NGT) group (n = 36) and LT group (n = 44) between August 2015 and August 2018 at our hospital. Univariate analysis was used to assess the clinical efficacy of 2 groups of patients.There were no significant differences in the mean age, sex ratio, and previous surgical history between the 2 groups. There were statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of improvement time of clinical indications (4.2 ± 1.4 vs 2.5 ± 0.6 days; P = .008), liquid decompression amount on the first day of catheterization (870.4 ± 400.8 vs 1738.4 ± 460.2 mL; P = .000), transit operation rate (4/36 vs 0/44; P = .023), clinical cure rate (25/36 vs 40/44; P = .014), total treatment efficiency (32/36 vs 44/44; P = .023), and total hospitalization cost (3.25 ± 0.39 vs 2.07 ± 0.41 ¥ ten thousand; P = .000).The curative effect of LT in the treatment of phytobezoar intestinal obstruction is accurate and reliable, which can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of patients, comprehensively improve the non-surgical rate of intestinal obstruction treatment, reduce the total cost of hospitalization, and is worthy of promotion in clinical application.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30882686 PMCID: PMC6426573 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014861
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1A, Abdominal CT scan shows an intestinal mass considered to be a phytobezoar (white arrow), and shows proximal intestinal dilatation and intestinal effusion. B, The red arrow indicates the long intestinal tube placed in the intestinal cavity, showing bezoar disintegrating, decreased expansion of the bowel after decompression and significantly reduced intestinal effusion.
Figure 2Flow chart of inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study.
Baseline characteristics of the study population∗.
Comparison of clinical indications between the 2 groups∗.
Comparison of the efficacy evaluation and transit surgery between the 2 groups.