| Literature DB >> 30881420 |
Muhammad Ishtiaq Jan1, Riaz Anwar Khan2, Aneesa Sultan3, Anwar Ullah4, Ayesha Ishtiaq5, Iram Murtaza6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concentration of N terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) and partially the serum uric acid in the severe condition of aortic valve dysfunction for assessment of left ventricle hypertrophy.Entities:
Keywords: Aortic valve; Heart failure; Left ventricle hypertrophy; NT-proBNP; Uric acid
Year: 2019 PMID: 30881420 PMCID: PMC6408659 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.35.1.148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 1.088
Fig.1The scattered diagram shows that patients and healthy age. The trend line of regression is horizontal showing the neutralization of age effect between control and disease groups.
Comparison of clinical (levels of NT-proBNP and uric acid) and demographic parameters in sub types of disease and controls.
| Sub Types of Disease | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | AR | AS+AR | |
| Patients | 6 | 8 | 86 |
| Age (Years) | 55.9±11.4 | 29.8±17.2 | 44.7±13.7 |
| Gender (M/F) | 4/2 | 8/0 | 84/2 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/ml) | 5990.2±5893 | 5375.8±4220 | 2201.2±804 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Serum Uric Acid (mg/dl) | 6.4±1.9 | 5.6±1.3 | 6.1±1.2 |
| 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.14 | |
| Controls | 100 | ||
| Age (Years) | Male (46.7±13.5) Female (42.5±12.9) | ||
| Gender (M/F) | 1/1 | ||
| NT-proBNP (pg/ml) | 24.7±8.5 | ||
| Serum Uric Acid (mg/dl) | 4±0.1.4 | ||
δAortic valve (A), Stenosis (S), Regurgitation (R), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)
Tukey multiple comparison test, *P value was significant when less than 0.05
Clinical (levels of NT-proBNP and uric acid) and demographic parameters in aortic valve disease groups and controls.
| Sub groups of aortic valve disease | NT-proBNP | Uric Acid | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (pg/ml) ± SD | Mean Difference at 95% Confidence Interval | (mg/dl) ± SD | Mean Difference at 95% Confidence Interval | ||||
| AS+AR (n = 86) | AS | 5990.2±5893 | -3788.9 | <0.001 | 6.4±1.9 | 2.1 | 0.85 |
| AR | 5375.8±4220 | -3174.6 | <0.003 | 5.6±1.3 | 1.6 | 0.89 | |
| Control | 24.7±8.5 | 2176.4 | <0.001 | 4±0.1.4 | 3.6 | 0.14 | |
| AS (n = 6) | AS+AR | 2201.2±804 | 3788.9 | <0.001 | 6.1±1.2 | -2.1 | 0.85 |
| AR | 5375.8±4220 | 614.2 | 0.955 | 5.6±1.3 | -0.45 | 0.9 | |
| Control | 24.7±8.5 | 5965.3 | <0.001 | 4±0.1.4 | 1.5 | 0.94 | |
| AR (n = 8) | AS+AR | 2201.2±804 | 3174.6 | <0.003 | 6.1±1.2 | -1.6 | 0.89 |
| AS | 5990.2±5893 | -614.2 | 0.955 | 6.4±1.9 | 0.45 | 0.9 | |
| Control | 24.7±8.5 | 5351.1 | <0.001 | 4±0.1.4 | 2.0 | 0.86 | |
| Control (n=100) | AS+AR | 2201.2±804 | -2176.4 | <0.001 | 6.1±1.2 | -3.6 | 0.14 |
| AS | 5990.2±5893 | -5965.3 | <0.001 | 6.4±1.9 | -1.5 | 0.94 | |
| AR | 5375.8±4220 | -5351.1 | <0.001 | 5.6±1.3 | -2.0 | 0.86 | |
δAortic valve (A), Stenosis (S), Regurgitation (R), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)
Tukey multiple comparison test, P value was significant when less than 0.05.
Fig.2The diagram shows the relationship between NT-proBNP and Uric Acid. The trend line of regression shows a weak co-relationship between the two markers.