| Literature DB >> 35535358 |
Muhammad Ishtiaq Jan1, Riaz Anwar Khan2, Ijaz Ahmad1, Naeem Khan1, Komal Urooj1, Azhar Ul Haq Ali Shah1, Asif Ullah Khan3, Tahir Ali4, Ayesha Ishtiaq4, Muhib Shah5, Anwar Ullah6, Iram Murtaza4, Riaz Ullah7, Amal Alotaibi8, H C Ananda Murthy9.
Abstract
Background: Valvular heart disease (VHD) is a major contributor to loss of physical function and longevity. Oxidative stress is one of the key causative factors involved in heart disease including VHD. Here, we aimed to illuminate the role and relation of oxidative stress to the VHD risk markers in the human population. Materials andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35535358 PMCID: PMC9078810 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5029853
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 7.310
Figure 1Prevalence of aortic valve disease in male and female patients. (a) Aortic valve disease is high in male patients. (b) Mitral valve disease is high in female patients. (c) The disease condition of both the aortic and mitral valves is high in male compared with female patients.
Figure 2New York Heart Association classification of patients showing 91.1% patients in class III and 8.9% patients in class IV.
Figure 3ROS and antioxidant activity levels. (a) The level of ROS is significantly high in aortic, mitral, and combined disease condition. (b) The activity of SOD is significantly low in all the three respective disease conditions. (c) The activity of CAT is significantly low in all the disease conditions of aortic, mitral, and combined disease condition of aortic with mitral valves. (d) The activity of POD is significantly low in all the disease groups of aortic and mitral valve. (e) The level of APX is significantly low in all the pathological conditions of aortic and mitral valve. (f) The level of TBARs is significantly high in all the respective disease groups of the aortic and mitral valve.
Figure 4Regression analysis between ROS, antioxidant, and TBARs activity levels: (a) ROS vs. SOD in AVR; (b) ROS vs. SOD in MVR; (c) ROS vs. SOD in DVR; (d) ROS vs. catalase in AVR; (e) ROS vs. catalase in MVR; (f) ROS vs. catalase in DVR; (g) ROS vs. POD in AVR; (h) ROS vs. POD in MVR; (i) ROS vs. POD in DVR; (j) ROS vs. APX in AVR; (k) ROS vs. APX in MVR; (l) ROS vs. APX in DVR; (m) ROS vs. TBARS in AVR; (n) ROS vs. TBARs in MVR; (o) ROS vs. TBARs in DVR. AVR: aortic valve replacement; MVR: mitral valve replacement; DVR: double valve replacement.
Clinical characteristics of patients vs. controls.
| Aortic valve disease | Mitral valve disease | Aortic+mitral valve disease | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient | Control | Patient | Control | Patient | Control | |
| M/F | 21/6 | 16/5 | 27/52 | 21/28 | 27/17 | 20/13 |
| Age (years) | 49.7 ± 10.1 | 47.7 ± 9.1 | 44.2 ± 11.9 | 43.8 ± 10.2 | 48.5 ± 12.1 | 46.3 ± 11.8 |
| hs-cardiac Trop I ng/mL | 0.044 ± 0.01 | 0.029 ± 0.02 | 0.041 ± 0.01 | 0.030 ± 0.01 | 0.051 ± 0.02 | 0.022 ± 0.01 |
|
| 0.001∗∗ | — | 0.00∗∗ | — | 0.00∗∗ | — |
| hs-cardiac Trop T ng/mL | 0.048 ± 0.02 | 0.022 ± 0.01 | 0.051 ± 0.02 | 0.026 ± 0.01 | 0.060 ± 0.01 | 0.048 ± 0.02 |
|
| 0.02∗ | — | 0.00∗∗ | — | 0.00∗∗ | — |
| CRP mg/L | 4.2 ± 0.87 | 2.9 ± 0.73 | 4.4 ± 1.17 | 2.8 ± 0.89 | 4.9 ± 1.14 | 3.0 ± 0.63 |
|
| 0.03∗ | — | 0.02∗ | — | 0.00∗∗ | — |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.13 ± 0.09 | 5.32 ± 0.07 | 5.29 ± 0.08 | 5.11 ± 0.07 | 5.33 ± 0.09 | 5.23 ± 0.08 |
|
| NS | — | NS | — | NS | — |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.53 ± 0.07 | 1.49 ± 0.06 | 1.61 ± 0.08 | 1.65 ± 0.07 | 1.71 ± 0.06 | 1.81 ± 0.09 |
|
| NS | — | NS | — | NS | — |
| HDL cholesterol | 1.45 ± 0.09 | 1.57 ± 0.07 | 1.67 ± 0.08 | 1.57 ± 0.06 | 1.78 ± 0.08 | 1.81 ± 0.07 |
|
| NS | NS | NS | |||
Values are given as mean ± SEM; ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗P < 0.05.
Figure 5Regression analysis of ROS with CRP, hs-TnI and hs-TnT: (a) ROS activity vs. CRP in AVR; (b) ROS activity vs. CRP in MVR; (c) ROS activity vs. CRP in DVR; (d) ROS activity vs. hs-TnI in AVR; (e) ROS activity vs. hs-TnI in MVR; (f) ROS activity vs. hs-TnI in DVR; (g) ROS activity vs. hs-TnT in AVR; (h) ROS activity vs. hs-TnT in MVR; (i) ROS activity vs. hs-TnT in DVR. AVR: aortic valve replacement; MVR: mitral valve replacement; DVR: double valve replacement.