Literature DB >> 30880441

Six-Month Results of Treatment-Blinded Medication Titration for Hypertension Control Following Randomization to Endovascular Ultrasound Renal Denervation or a Sham Procedure in the RADIANCE-HTN SOLO Trial.

Michel Azizi1, Roland E Schmieder2, Felix Mahfoud3, Michael A Weber4, Joost Daemen5, Melvin D Lobo6, Andrew S P Sharp7, Michael J Bloch8, Jan Basile9, Yale Wang10, Manish Saxena6, Philipp Lurz11, Florian Rader12, Jeremy Sayer13, Naomi D L Fisher14, David Fouassier1, Neil C Barman15, Helen Reeve-Stoffer15, Candace McClure16, Ajay J Kirtane17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The multicenter, international, randomized, blinded, sham-controlled RADIANCE-HTN SOLO trial demonstrated a 6.3 mmHg greater reduction in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure (BP) at 2 months by endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (RDN) compared with a sham procedure among patients not treated with antihypertensive medications. We report 6-month results following the addition of a recommended standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment (SSAHT) to the randomized endovascular procedure under continued blinding to initial treatment.
METHODS: Patients with a daytime ambulatory BP greater ≥135/85 mmHg and <170/105 mmHg after a 4-week discontinuation of up to 2 antihypertensive medications and a suitable renal artery anatomy, were randomized to RDN (n=74) or sham (n=72). Patients were to remain off antihypertensive medications throughout the first 2 months of follow-up unless safety BP criteria were exceeded. Between 2 and 5 months, if monthly measured home BP was ≥135/85 mmHg, a SSAHT was recommended consisting of the sequential addition of amlodipine 5 mg/day, a standard dose of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day, followed by the sequential uptitration of hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg/day) and amlodipine (10 mg/day). Outcomes included the 6-month (i) change in daytime ambulatory systolic BP adjusted for medications and baseline SBP, (ii) medication burden, and (iii) safety.
RESULTS: A total of 69/74 RDN patients and 71/72 sham patients completed the 6-month ambulatory BP measurement. At 6 months, 65.2% of patients in the RDN group were treated with the SSAHT vs. 84.5% in the sham group (p=0.008) and the average number of antihypertensive medications and defined daily dose were less in the RDN group than in the sham group (0.9±0.9 vs. 1.3±0.9, p=0.010 and 1.4±1.5 vs. 2.0±1.8, p=0.018; respectively). Despite less intensive SSAHT, RDN reduced daytime ambulatory systolic BP to a greater extent than sham (-18.1±12.2 vs. -15.6±13.2 mmHg, respectively; difference adjusted for baseline BP and number of medications: -4.3 mmHg, 95% confidence interval, -7.9 to -0.6, p=0.024). There were no major adverse events in either group through 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The BP lowering effect of endovascular ultrasound RDN was maintained at 6 months with less prescribed antihypertensive medications compared with a sham control. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02649426.

Entities:  

Keywords:  denervation; hypertension therapy; sham

Year:  2019        PMID: 30880441     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  17 in total

Review 1.  Renal Denervation: Is It Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Lucas Lauder; Milan A Wolf; Sean S Scholz; Mathias Hohl; Felix Mahfoud; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Renal denervation for resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Anna Pisano; Luigi Francesco Iannone; Antonio Leo; Emilio Russo; Giuseppe Coppolino; Davide Bolignano
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-22

Review 3.  The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement.

Authors:  V J M Zeijen; A A Kroon; B H van den Born; P J Blankestijn; S C A Meijvis; A Nap; E Lipsic; A Elvan; J Versmissen; R J van Geuns; M Voskuil; P A L Tonino; W Spiering; J Deinum; J Daemen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.854

Review 4.  Impact of therapeutic lifestyle changes in resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Cemal Ozemek; Stephanie Tiwari; Ahmad Sabbahi; Salvatore Carbone; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of renal denervation for the management of arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, sham-controlled, catheter-based trials.

Authors:  Konstantinos Stavropoulos; Dimitrios Patoulias; Konstantinos Imprialos; Michael Doumas; Alexandra Katsimardou; Kyriakos Dimitriadis; Costas Tsioufis; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Renal Denervation for the Treatment of Hypertension: Unnerving or Underappreciated?

Authors:  Harini Sarathy; Jordana B Cohen
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 10.614

7.  Acute renal denervation normalizes aortic function and decreases blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  Nathalia Juocys Dias Moreira; Fernando Dos Santos; Edson Dias Moreira; Daniela Farah; Leandro Eziquiel de Souza; Maikon Barbosa da Silva; Ivana Cinthya Moraes-Silva; Gisele Silvério Lincevicius; Elia Garcia Caldini; Maria Cláudia Costa Irigoyen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Proceedings from the 3rd European Clinical Consensus Conference for clinical trials in device-based hypertension therapies.

Authors:  Felix Mahfoud; Michel Azizi; Sebastian Ewen; Atul Pathak; Christian Ukena; Peter J Blankestijn; Michael Böhm; Michel Burnier; Gilles Chatellier; Isabelle Durand Zaleski; Guido Grassi; Michael Joner; David E Kandzari; Ajay Kirtane; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Melvin D Lobo; Thomas F Lüscher; John William McEvoy; Gianfranco Parati; Patrick Rossignol; Luis Ruilope; Markus P Schlaich; Atif Shahzad; Faisal Sharif; Andrew S P Sharp; Horst Sievert; Massimo Volpe; Michael A Weber; Roland E Schmieder; Costas Tsioufis; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  A Japan nationwide web-based survey of estimation on patients for renal denervation based on blood pressure level and the number of antihypertensives (J-NEEDs survey).

Authors:  Hideaki Kagitani; Shoko Hayashi; Satsuki Hanamura; Keisuke Ozawa; Daisuke Kobayashi; Shunsuke Hiki; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Arterial hypertension - Clinical trials update 2021.

Authors:  Hussam Al Ghorani; Felix Götzinger; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.