Literature DB >> 30880212

Distribution Pattern Making Sense: Patients Achieve Rapider Pain Relief with Confluent Rather Than Separated Bilateral Cement in Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Hao Liu1, Junxin Zhang1, Xiao Liang1, Zhonglai Qian1, Zhangzhe Zhou1, Hui Lu2, Emily Hong Bou3, Bin Meng1, Haiqing Mao1, Huilin Yang1, Tao Liu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been reported the distribution of bone cement in percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) has an impact on the curative effect. No studies have compared between confluent and separated cement pattern of bilateral bone cement in PKP for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
METHODS: Between 2010 and 2016, 1341 patients were enrolled and divided into 2 groups. Group A (n = 723), bilateral cement was confluent; Group B (n = 618), bilateral cement was separated. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), anterior vertebral height (AVH), and local kyphotic angle (LKA) were obtained preoperatively, 2 days after surgery, and at the final follow-up to assess the functional and radiographic efficacy of the surgery.
RESULTS: The VAS, ODI, AVH, and LKA 2 days after operation and at the final follow-up were significantly improved compared with the preoperative for both groups (P < 0.05). There existed no significant difference between groups at various time point in ODI, AVH, and LKA (P > 0.05). Group A showed better VAS than group B 2 days after surgery (1.91 ± 0.98 vs. 2.35 ± 0.78, P < 0.001), also with better pre-postoperative VAS change (6.23 ± 0.76 vs. 5.75 ± 1.02, P < 0.001). Multiple linear regression for pain relief degree revealed group A (P < 0.001), older age (P < 0.001), and more cement volume (P < 0.001) contribute to rapid improvement of back pain. The cement leakage rate was 3.7% in group A and 2.9% in group B, with no significant difference (P = 0.405).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients achieved rapider pain relief with confluent rather than separated bilateral bone cement pattern in PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone cement; Distribution; OVCF; Pain; Percutaneous kyphoplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30880212     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  6 in total

1.  Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting the Risk of Recollapse Following Minimally Invasive Kyphoplasty in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Sheng-Tao Dong; Jieyang Zhu; Hua Yang; Guangyi Huang; Chenning Zhao; Bo Yuan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-02

2.  Effect of Different Anesthesia and Puncture Methods of Percutaneous Kyphoplasty on More Than 90-Year-Old Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Advantages of the ERAS Concept.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Lei Deng; Jun-Xin Zhang; Quan Zhou; Zhong-Lai Qian; Chun-Yang Fan; Kang-Wu Chen; Hui-Lin Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.149

3.  Kyphoplasty versus percutaneous posterior instrumentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures with posterior wall injury: a propensity score matched cohort study.

Authors:  Manuel Moser; Julien Jost; Edin Nevzati
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-03

4.  A finite element analysis on different bone cement forms and injection volumes injected into lumbar vertebral body in percutaneous kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Xun Zhang; Tiantian Chen; Fanchao Meng; Shiwen Li; Gongping Xu; Jinglong Yan; Wei Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  The influence of diverse bone cement distribution patterns for metastatic vertebral lesions after bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Wence Wu; Xinxin Zhang; Xiaoyang Li; Shengji Yu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  A novel and convenient method to evaluate bone cement distribution following percutaneous vertebral augmentation.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Jing Tang; Hao Liu; Zuchao Gu; Yu Zhang; Shenghui Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.