Literature DB >> 30880075

Trends in Urethral Stricture Disease Etiology and Urethroplasty Technique From a Multi-institutional Surgical Outcomes Research Group.

Katherine J Cotter1, Amy E Hahn1, Bryan B Voelzke2, Jeremy B Myers3, Thomas G Smith4, Sean P Elliott5, Nejd F Alsikafi6, Benjamin N Breyer7, Alex J Vanni8, Jill C Buckley9, Lee C Zhao10, Joshua A Broghammer11, Bradley A Erickson12.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze contemporary urethroplasty trends and urethral stricture etiologies over a 7-year study period among urologists from a large multi-institutional surgical outcomes group.
METHODS: Review of a multi-institutional, prospectively maintained urethroplasty database was performed on 2098 anterior urethroplasties done between 2010 and 2017 by 10 surgeons. Stricture characteristics, including etiology, length, and anatomic location were analyzed and compared to urethroplasty type over the study period using chi-squared analysis to assess for linear trends within the group and by surgeon.
RESULTS: Average stricture lengths for bulbar (2.8 ± 1.8 cm), penile (3.6 ± 2.6 cm), and penile-bulbar strictures (8.7 ± 5.0) remained stable. The most common stricture etiology was idiopathic/unknown in all study years (63%). In the bulbar urethra, the group performed significantly (1) fewer excisional repairs (-31%) and more substitutional repairs (+78%); (2) of substitutional repairs, more grafts are being placed dorsally (+95%) vs ventrally (-75%) (3) of the bulbar excisional repairs, more are being performed without transection of the bulbar urethra (+430%); and in the penile urethra (4) the fasciocutaneous flap is in decline (-86%), while single-stage dorsal repairs are increasing (+280%).
CONCLUSION: Anterior urethroplasty techniques continue to evolve in the absence of robust clinical data or randomized controlled trials, with a general movement in this cohort toward an initial dorsal approach for most strictures. Inter- and intrasurgeon variability in the surgical management of similar strictures was noted, and the feasibility of any future randomized controlled trials, without apparent surgical equipoise, must be questioned.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30880075     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.01.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  The contribution of the immune system to genitourinary fibrosis.

Authors:  Karen M Doersch; Daniel Barnett; Abbie Chase; Daniel Johnston; J Scott Gabrielsen
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-05-07

2.  The Changing Trend in Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Male Patients With Urethral Stricture Over the Past 10 Years in China.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Mao Ding; Mou Peng; Lizhi Zhou; Yijian Li; Shuang Peng; Shunhua Cheng; Yinhuai Wang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-24

3.  Histopathologic and clinical comparison of recurrent and non-recurrent urethral stricture disease treated by reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Iryna V Samarska; Hasan Dani; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Arthur L Burnett; Andres Matoso
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

4.  Circ_0047339 promotes the activation of fibroblasts and affects the development of urethral stricture by targeting the miR-4691-5p/TSP-1 axis.

Authors:  Ke Ding; Daoyuan Li; Rui Zhang; Meilin Zuo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Sexual function following pelvic fracture urethral injury and posterior urethroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Mazzone; Ross Anderson; Bryan B Voelzke; Alex J Vanni; Sean P Elliott; Benjamin N Breyer; Bradley A Erickson; Jill Buckley; Jeremy Myers
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.