Literature DB >> 30879927

Effort-based decision-making impairment in patients with clinically-stabilized first-episode psychosis and its relationship with amotivation and psychosocial functioning.

Wing Chung Chang1, Angel On Ki Chu2, Michael T Treadway3, Gregory P Strauss4, Sherry Kit Wa Chan5, Edwin Ho Ming Lee2, Christy Lai Ming Hui2, Yi Nam Suen2, Eric Yu Hai Chen5.   

Abstract

Effort-based decision-making has recently been proposed as a potential mechanism contributing to motivational deficits (amotivation) in psychotic disorder. Previous research has identified altered effort allocation in chronic schizophrenia, but produced mixed results regarding its relationship with amotivation. No study has investigated effort allocation in first-episode psychosis (FEP). We examined effort-based decision-making in 45 clinically-stabilized FEP patients and 45 demographically-matched controls, using Effort-Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT) which measures allocation of physical effort for monetary reward at varying magnitude and probability levels. Our results showed that FEP patients did not demonstrate overall reduction in effort expenditure but displayed reduced willingness to expend effort for high-value/high-probability reward as compared to controls. In particular, such selective effort-related impairment was most pronounced in patients with high levels of amotivation. Furthermore, reduced allocation of greater effort for higher probability reward was related to poorer psychosocial functioning. Decreased effort exertion was generally unrelated to other symptom dimensions, self-report anhedonia, antipsychotic dose and cognitive deficits. This study thus provides the first evidence of effort-based decision-making impairment in FEP, and indicates that first-episode patients were not generally effort-averse but exhibited inefficient effort allocation by failing to make high-effort choices to maximize reward receipt. Our findings affirm the critical role of amotivation on aberrant effort allocation, and support the link between laboratory-based effort-cost measures and real-world psychosocial functioning in medicated FEP. Further longitudinal research is required to clarify trajectory of suboptimal effort allocation and its potential utility in predicting amotivation and functional outcomes in the early course of illness.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early psychosis; Effort allocation; Effort-cost computation; Motivational deficits; Negative symptoms; Schizophrenia

Year:  2019        PMID: 30879927     DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 0924-977X            Impact factor:   4.600


  6 in total

1.  Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT).

Authors:  Hanno Andreas Ohmann; Niclas Kuper; Jan Wacker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Pleasure, Reward Value, Prediction Error and Anhedonia.

Authors:  Karel Kieslich; Vincent Valton; Jonathan P Roiser
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022

3.  Effort-related decision making in humanized COMT mice: Effects of Val158Met polymorphisms and possible implications for negative symptoms in humans.

Authors:  Jen-Hau Yang; Rose E Presby; Suzanne Cayer; Renee A Rotolo; Peter A Perrino; R Holly Fitch; Merce Correa; Elissa J Chesler; John D Salamone
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.697

4.  Impact of Positive Emotion Regulation Training on Negative Symptoms and Social Functioning in Schizophrenia: A Field Test.

Authors:  Jérôme Favrod; Alexandra Nguyen; Anne-Marie Tronche; Olivier Blanc; Julien Dubreucq; Isabelle Chereau-Boudet; Delphine Capdevielle; Pierre Michel Llorca
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Impaired Effort Allocation in Patients with Recent-Onset Schizophrenia and Its Relevance to Negative Symptoms Assessments and Persistent Negative Symptoms.

Authors:  Ezgi Ince Guliyev; Sinan Guloksuz; Alp Ucok
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Motivational disturbances in rodent models of neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Tara Canonica; Ioannis Zalachoras
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.617

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.