Rui Zhou1, Dihan Lu2, Wenda Li1, Wenliang Tan1, Sicong Zhu1, Xianqing Chen1, Jun Min3, Changzhen Shang4, Yajin Chen5. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: minj_sysu@163.com. 4. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: shangchangzhen@139.com. 5. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: chenyj_sysu@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: A literature search with a date range of January 2000 to January 2018 was performed to identify studies comparing lymph node dissection (LND+) with non-lymph node dissection (LND-) for patients with ICC. The LND + group was further divided into positive (LND + N+) and negative (LND + N-) lymph node status groups based on pathological analysis. RESULTS: 13 studies including 1377 patients were eligible. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.94-1.36; P = 0.20), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.94-1.60; P = 0.13), or recurrence (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.90-2.15; P = 0.14) between LND + group and LND-group. Postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the LND + group (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.74-4.10; P < 0.001). A subset analysis showed that OS was similar between LND + N- and LND-groups (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.82-1.56; P = 0.450). However when comparing, OS of the LND-group to the LND+N+ group there was a significant increase in OS for the LND-group (HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.85-5.76; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LND does not seem to positively affect overall survival and is associated with increased post-operative morbidity.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: A literature search with a date range of January 2000 to January 2018 was performed to identify studies comparing lymph node dissection (LND+) with non-lymph node dissection (LND-) for patients with ICC. The LND + group was further divided into positive (LND + N+) and negative (LND + N-) lymph node status groups based on pathological analysis. RESULTS: 13 studies including 1377 patients were eligible. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.94-1.36; P = 0.20), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.94-1.60; P = 0.13), or recurrence (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.90-2.15; P = 0.14) between LND + group and LND-group. Postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the LND + group (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.74-4.10; P < 0.001). A subset analysis showed that OS was similar between LND + N- and LND-groups (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.82-1.56; P = 0.450). However when comparing, OS of the LND-group to the LND+N+ group there was a significant increase in OS for the LND-group (HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.85-5.76; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LND does not seem to positively affect overall survival and is associated with increased post-operative morbidity.