| Literature DB >> 30877715 |
Da Hea Seo1, So Hun Kim1, Joon Ho Song2, Seongbin Hong1, Young Ju Suh3, Seong Hee Ahn1, Jeong Taek Woo4, Sei Hyun Baik5, Yongsoo Park6, Kwan Woo Lee7, Young Seol Kim4, Moonsuk Nam8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent evidences indicate that early rapid renal function decline is closely associated with the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease. We have investigated the association between carotid atherosclerosis and rapid renal function decline in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and preserved renal function.Entities:
Keywords: Carotid stenosis; Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Diabetic nephropathies
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30877715 PMCID: PMC6943261 DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab J ISSN: 2233-6079 Impact factor: 5.376
Baseline characteristics of participants stratified by renal function decline status
| Characteristic | Total ( | Non-decliners ( | Rapid decliners ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yr | 53.7±9.4 | 53.4±9.3 | 56.0±9.9 | 0.002a |
| Male sex | 555 (57.4) | 500 (61.8) | 55 (34.8) | <0.001a |
| Diabetes duration, yr | 5.4±5.8 | 5.1±5.7 | 7.0±6.0 | <0.001a |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.4 ±3.2 | 25.4±3.2 | 25.3±3.1 | 0.765 |
| WC, cm | 88.3±8.1 | 88.5±8.2 | 87.4±7.6 | 0.132 |
| SBP, mm Hg | 125.8±14.6 | 125.5±14.7 | 127.1±14.3 | 0.219 |
| DBP, mm Hg | 78.7±9.3 | 78.7±9.4 | 78.7±9.2 | 0.985 |
| Hypertension | 443 (45.8) | 346 (42.7) | 97 (61.4) | <0.001a |
| Current smoker | 194 (20.1) | 173 (21.4) | 21 (13.3) | 1.000 |
| Dyslipidemia | 314 (32.5) | 263 (33.6) | 51 (33.6) | 1.000 |
| CVD | 107 (11.1) | 80 (9.9) | 27 (17.1) | 0.011a |
| Diabetic retinopathy | 147 (15.2) | 118 (14.6) | 29 (18.4) | 0.209 |
| Mean CIMT, mm | 0.7 (0.6–0.9) | 0.7 (0.6–0.9) | 0.7 (0.6–0.9) | 0.661 |
| Carotid plaque (+) | 315 (32.6) | 242 (29.9) | 73 (46.2) | <0.001a |
| HbA1c, % | 7.7±1.8 | 7.6±1.8 | 8.0±1.8 | 0.018a |
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 143.5 ±52.4 | 143.3±53.3 | 144.0±48.2 | 0.891 |
| PP2 glucose, mg/dL | 262.2±93.8 | 261.7±92.6 | 264.9±100.2 | 0.746 |
| HOMA-IR, units | 3.0±3.1 | 3.0±2.9 | 3.1±3.8 | 0.582 |
| hsCRP, mg/dL | 1.8±7.5 | 1.9±7.9 | 1.4±2.1 | 0.388 |
| TG, mg/dL | 159.8±121.4 | 160.8±126.8 | 154.6±88.0 | 0.480 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 47.3±12.1 | 47.0±11.9 | 49.4±12.8 | 0.033a |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 103.1±36.2 | 103.7±36.6 | 100.3±33.7 | 0.316 |
| Albuminuria | 0.277 | |||
| Normoalbuminuria | 655 (67.7) | 552 (76.2) | 103 (71.0) | |
| Microalbuminuria | 191 (19.8) | 152 (21.0) | 39 (26.9) | |
| Macroalbuminuria | 23 (2.4) | 20 (2.8) | 3 (2.1) | |
| UACR, mg/g | 11.8 (5.7–29.0) | 11.2 (5.5–27.4) | 15.6 (6.2–34.3) | 0.018a |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.8±0.2 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.7±0.2 | 0.006a |
| eGFR at baseline, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 95.6±14.6 | 96.0±14.6 | 93.8±14.8 | 0.089 |
| eGFR at the end of FU, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 84.34±17.2 | 88.0±14.9 | 64.9±15.6 | <0.001a |
| eGFR slope, %/year | –1.1±2.6 | –0.4±1.9 | –5.2±1.9 | <0.001a |
| Diabetes medications | ||||
| Sulfonylurea | 212 (21.9) | 169 (20.9) | 43 (27.2) | 0.098 |
| Metformin | 299 (30.9) | 240 (33.4) | 59 (37.3) | 0.069 |
| Insulin | 71 (7.3) | 58 (7.2) | 13 (8.2) | 0.764 |
| Use of ACEi/ARB | 236 (24.4) | 88 (10.9) | 48 (30.4) | 0.070 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, number (%), or median (interquartile range). P values refer to the unpaired t-test or the chi-square test (for categorical variables).
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; PP2, 2-hour post prandial; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; UACR, urinary albumin creatinine ratio; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FU, follow-up; ACEi, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II-receptor blocker.
aStatistical significance.
Comparison of baseline characteristics stratified by the presence of carotid plaque
| Characteristic | Carotid plaque (−) ( | Carotid plaque (+) ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yr | 52.1±9.5 | 56.9±8.7 | <0.001a |
| Male sex | 266 (55.0) | 195 (61.9) | 0.062 |
| Diabetes duration, yr | 4.9±5.5 | 6.3±6.0 | 0.001a |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.3±3.2 | 25.4±3.1 | 0.764 |
| WC, cm | 88.2±8.5 | 88.8±7.6 | 0.312 |
| SBP, mm Hg | 124.5±14.2 | 128.0±15.0 | 0.001a |
| DBP, mm Hg | 78.6±9.3 | 78.8±9.2 | 0.781 |
| Hypertension | 198 (41.2) | 167 (53.5) | 0.001a |
| Current smoker | 106 (44.7) | 63 (39.9) | 0.395 |
| Dyslipidemia | 153 (33.0) | 104 (34.0) | 0.847 |
| CVD | 39 (8.1) | 43 (13.7) | 0.016a |
| Diabetic retinopathy | 67 (17.0) | 49 (19.4) | 0.500 |
| HbA1c, % | 7.8±1.9 | 7.6±1.6 | 0.051 |
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 148.6±60.1 | 139.7±44.0 | 0.019a |
| PP2 glucose, mg/dL | 273.9±94.9 | 251.0±95.8 | 0.008a |
| HOMA-IR, units | 3.1±3.4 | 3.0±3.0 | 0.769 |
| hsCRP, mg/dL | 2.1±9.4 | 1.5±3.9 | 0.332 |
| TG, mg/dL | 167.9±130.0 | 143.3±90.6 | 0.002a |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 48.4±12.1 | 47.6±11.5 | 0.427 |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 101.6±35.4 | 103.0±39.8 | 0.649 |
| Albuminuria | 0.414 | ||
| Normoalbuminuria | 345 (76.8) | 216 (72.7) | |
| Microalbuminuria | 93 (20.7) | 71 (23.9) | |
| Macroalbuminuria | 11 (2.4) | 10 (3.4) | |
| UACR, mg/g | 11.5 (5.4–27.4) | 13.1 (6.2–32.6) | 0.118 |
| Creatinine, mg/g | 0.78± 0.2 | 0.81±0.2 | 0.030a |
| eGFR at baseline, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 96.7±14.5 | 92.6±13.6 | <0.001a |
| eGFR at the end of FU, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 86.2±16.1 | 78.8±17.4 | <0.001a |
| Sulfonylurea | 93 (19.2) | 93 (29.5) | 0.001a |
| Metformin | 132 (27.3) | 118 (37.5) | 0.003a |
| Insulin | 38 (7.9) | 22 (7.0) | 0.751 |
| Use of ACEi/ARB | 100 (20.7) | 100 (31.7) | 0.001a |
| eGFR slope, %/year | –0.9±2.4 | –1.6±2.6 | <0.001a |
| Rapid decliners | 59 (12.2) | 73 (23.2) | <0.001a |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, number (%), or median (interquartile range). P values refer to the unpaired t-test or the chi-square test (for categorical variables).
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; PP2, 2-hour post prandial; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; UACR, urinary albumin creatinine ratio; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FU, follow-up; ACEi, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II-receptor blocker.
aStatistical significance.
Clinical predictors for progression of rapid renal function decline
| Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||||
| Carotid plaque | 1.97 (1.29–3.00) | 0.002a | 1.87 (1.21–2.87) | 0.004a | 2.33 (1.48–3.68) | <0.001a |
| Age, yr | 1.01 (0.99–1.04) | 0.662 | 1.01 (0.98–1.03) | 0.535 | 0.99 (0.96–1.02) | 0.686 |
| Diabetes duration, yr | 1.04 (1.01–1.08) | 0.007a | 1.03 (1.00–1.07) | 0.079 | 1.03 (0.99–1.07) | 0.100 |
| HbA1c, % | 1.15 (1.03–1.28) | 0.016a | 1.17 (1.05–1.31) | 0.006a | 1.16 (1.03–1.31) | 0.012a |
| Baseline eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 0.99 (0.98–1.01) | 0.480 | 1.00 (0.98–1.02) | 0.856 | 1.00 (0.98–1.01) | 0.686 |
| UACRb, mg/g | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 0.620 | 1.00 (1.00–1.07) | 0.656 | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 0.371 |
| CVD | - | - | 1.49 (0.82–2.70) | 0.187 | 1.59 (0.86–2.95) | 0.140 |
| Hypertension | - | - | 1.75 (1.13–2.71) | 0.012a | 1.78 (1.14–2.80) | 0.012a |
| Female sex | - | - | - | - | 3.46 (2.19–5.47) | <0.001a |
Model 1 was adjusted for age, diabetes duration, HbA1c, baseline eGFR, and UACR. Model 2 included all variables in Model 1 plus presence of CVD and hypertension. Model 3 included all variables in Model 2 plus sex.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; eGRF, estimated glomerular filtration rate; UACR, urinary albumin creatinine ratio; CVD, cardiovascular disease.
aStatistical significance, bLogarithm-transformed values were used for analysis.
Fig. 1Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the models with or without carotid plaque. AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.