Literature DB >> 30877654

Optimization of the Data Treatment Steps of a Non-targeted LC-MS-Based Workflow for the Identification of Trace Chemical Residues in Honey.

Annie von Eyken1, Stéphane Bayen2.   

Abstract

Non-targeted screening (e.g., suspected-target) is emerging as an attractive tool to investigate the occurrence of contaminants in food. The sample preparation and instrument analysis steps are known to influence the identification of analytes with non-targeted workflows, especially for complex matrices. However, for methods based on mass spectrometry, the impact of the post-analysis data treatment (e.g., feature extraction) on the capacity to correctly identify a contaminant at trace level is currently not well understood. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of seven post-analysis data treatment parameters on the non-targeted identification of trace contaminants in honey using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-QTOF-MS). Seven compounds reported as veterinary drugs for honeybees were applied as model compounds. Among the parameters studied, the expansion window for chromatogram extraction and the average scans included in the spectra influenced significantly the identification process results. The optimized data treatment was applied to the non-targeted screening of veterinary drugs, pesticides, and other contaminants in 55 honey samples as a proof of concept. Among the 43 compounds included in a library of honey-related compounds that was used for screening, eight compounds were tentatively identified in at least one honey sample. The tentative identity of two of these compounds (tylosin A and hydroxymethylfurfural) was further confirmed with analytical standards. Graphical Abstract.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acquisition; Data-independent; Food contaminants; HPLC-QTOF-MS; Suspected screening

Year:  2019        PMID: 30877654     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-019-02157-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  29 in total

1.  LC-high resolution MS in environmental analysis: from target screening to the identification of unknowns.

Authors:  Martin Krauss; Heinz Singer; Juliane Hollender
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 2.  Honey: Chemical composition, stability and authenticity.

Authors:  Priscila Missio da Silva; Cony Gauche; Luciano Valdemiro Gonzaga; Ana Carolina Oliveira Costa; Roseane Fett
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 7.514

3.  A pragmatic and readily implemented quality control strategy for HPLC-MS and GC-MS-based metabonomic analysis.

Authors:  Timothy Sangster; Hilary Major; Robert Plumb; Amy J Wilson; Ian D Wilson
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.616

4.  Discovery of False Identification Using Similarity Difference in GC-MS based Metabolomics.

Authors:  Seongho Kim; Xiang Zhang
Journal:  J Chemom       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.467

5.  Benefits and pitfalls of the application of screening methods for the analysis of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables.

Authors:  Octavio Malato; Ana Lozano; Milagros Mezcua; Ana Agüera; Amadeo R Fernandez-Alba
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  Targeted and non-targeted drug screening in whole blood by UHPLC-TOF-MS with data-independent acquisition.

Authors:  Christian Brinch Mollerup; Petur Weihe Dalsgaard; Marie Mardal; Kristian Linnet
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.345

Review 7.  Strategies for large-scale targeted metabolomics quantification by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Juntuo Zhou; Yuxin Yin
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.616

8.  Non-targeted, high resolution mass spectrometry strategy for simultaneous monitoring of xenobiotics and endogenous compounds in green sea turtles on the Great Barrier Reef.

Authors:  Amy L Heffernan; Maria M Gómez-Ramos; Caroline Gaus; Soumini Vijayasarathy; Ian Bell; Christine Hof; Jochen F Mueller; Maria J Gómez-Ramos
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Non-target evaluation of contaminants in honey bees and pollen samples by gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  E Hakme; A Lozano; M M Gómez-Ramos; M D Hernando; A R Fernández-Alba
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Seven Golden Rules for heuristic filtering of molecular formulas obtained by accurate mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tobias Kind; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Data Processing Thresholds for Abundance and Sparsity and Missed Biological Insights in an Untargeted Chemical Analysis of Blood Specimens for Exposomics.

Authors:  Dinesh Kumar Barupal; Sadjad Fakouri Baygi; Robert O Wright; Manish Arora
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.