Literature DB >> 30876785

Optimal near and distance stereoacuity after binocular implantation of extended range of vision intraocular lenses.

Jeewan S Titiyal1, Manpreet Kaur2, Neha Bharti2, Deepali Singhal2, Rohit Saxena3, Namrata Sharma2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate stereopsis and visual quality after bilateral implantation of extended range of vision intraocular lenses (ERV IOLs).
SETTING: R.P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
DESIGN: Prospective interventional study.
METHODS: Patients underwent phacoemulsification with bilateral implantation of ERV IOLs. The primary outcome measures were stereopsis (distance and near Randot) and visual quality (ray-tracing aberrometry). The secondary outcome measures were visual acuity and patient satisfaction. Follow-up was performed on day 1 and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The study comprised 50 patients (100 eyes). The mean age of the patients was 58.9 years ± 8.9 (SD). At 1 year, the mean distance stereopsis was 103.6 ± 49.1 seconds of arc (arcsec) and near stereopsis was 21.1 ± 2.3 arcsec. Perfect near stereopsis of 20 arcsec was present in 80% of cases, and 82% had good distance stereopsis of 100 arcsec or better. Stereopsis correlated well with the patient satisfaction score (P < .001) and average internal modulation transfer function (MTF) (P < .015). The mean Strehl ratio was 0.029 ± 0.021, MTF was 0.24 ± 0.08, total higher-order aberrations were 0.62 ± 0.41 μm, and coma was 0.25 ± 0.18 μm. The mean binocular uncorrected decimal visual acuities were 0.98 ± 0.07 (distance), 0.82 ± 0.09 (intermediate) and 0.64 ± 0.08 (near). The mean patient satisfaction score was 9.08 ± 1.1, and no case required IOL explantation because of visually disturbing phenomena or patient dissatisfaction.
CONCLUSION: Excellent stereoacuity was observed after bilateral implantation of ERV IOLs, which correlated well with patient satisfaction and quality of vision.
Copyright © 2019 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30876785     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of trifocal toric and bifocal toric intraocular lens implantation in patients with cataract and high corneal astigmatism.

Authors:  Merve Bozkurt Gencer; Hikmet Basmak; Erdogan Yasar; Ozkan Onal
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparisons of visual outcomes between bilateral implantation and mix-and-match implantation of three types intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Shurui Ke; Wenjuan Wan; Can Li
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 2.029

3.  Visual outcomes of binocular implantation of a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens.

Authors:  Rajesh Sinha; Pranita Sahay; Rohit Saxena; Nidhi Kalra; Vinay Gupta; Jeewan S Titiyal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 4.  Extended Depth-of-Field Intraocular Lenses: An Update.

Authors:  Piotr Kanclerz; Francesca Toto; Andrzej Grzybowski; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2020 May-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.