| Literature DB >> 30875933 |
Oana Stanciu1,2, Cristina Juan3, Houda Berrada4, Doina Miere5, Felicia Loghin6, Jordi Mañes7.
Abstract
To evaluate the influence of weather conditions on mycotoxin presence in wheat, deoxynivalenol (DON), 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3AcDON), 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15AcDON), fusarenon-X (FUS-X), nivalenol (NIV), HT-2 toxin (HT-2), T-2 toxin (T-2), diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS), neosolaniol (NEO) and zearalenone (ZEN) were evaluated in 102 Romanian wheat samples coming from five wheat growing areas during 2015. Only six mycotoxins were detected, while FUS-X, DAS, NEO and NIV were not present in the wheat samples. Mycotoxin concentrations were correlated with precipitation and temperature values during anthesis and the preharvest period. Overall, the highest frequency was registered for DON, while the lowest frequency was registered for NIV. In the North Muntenia, DON and ZEN registered high frequencies (68% and 16%, respectively). This region was characterized in June and July by medium to high values of rainfall (41⁻100 mm/month) and normal temperatures (mean of 20.0 °C in June and 24.0 °C in July), suggesting that precipitation levels influence fungi and mycotoxin development to a greater extent compared to the influence of temperature.Entities:
Keywords: GC-MS/MS; Romania; air temperature; cereals; mycotoxins; precipitations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30875933 PMCID: PMC6468749 DOI: 10.3390/toxins11030163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Chromatographic and analytical parameters for mycotoxin detection by GC-MS/MS: retention time (Rt); quantification (Q) and confirmation (q) transitions; collision energy (CE); dwell time (Dt); limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ); recovery at three spiked concentration levels; interday relative standard deviation (RSD); matrix effect (ME); linearity expressed as a correlation coefficient (r2).
| Analyte | Rt (min) | SRM (Selection Reaction Monitoring) Transitions ( | CE (eV) | Dt (ms) | LOD | LOQ | Recovery (RSD) (%) | ME ± RSD (%) | Linearity (r2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOQ | 2 LOQ | 10 LOQ | ||||||||||||
| DON | 8.45 | 392 > 259 Q | 10 | 25 | 0.5 | 1 | 100 | (7) | 95 | (1) | 127 | (2) | 85 ± 9 | 0.994 |
| 407 > 197 q | 10 | 25 | ||||||||||||
| 3AcDON | 9.45 | 392 > 287 Q | 10 | 25 | 1.25 | 2.5 | 84 | (17) | 85 | (4) | 117 | (15) | 133 ± 7 | 0.995 |
| 467 > 147 q | 5 | 35 | ||||||||||||
| 15AcDON | 9.65 | 392 > 217 Q | 20 | 35 | 2.5 | 5 | 87 | (1) | 82 | (6) | 108 | (11) | 102 ± 6 | 0.996 |
| 392 > 184 q | 20 | 35 | ||||||||||||
| FUS-X | 9.55 | 450 > 26 Q | 10 | 35 | 2.5 | 5 | 79 | (4) | 73 | (3) | 97 | (7) | 137 ± 4 | 0.998 |
| 450 > 245 q | 20 | 35 | ||||||||||||
| DAS | 9.56 | 350 > 229 Q | 15 | 35 | 7.5 | 15 | 83 | (16) | 77 | (11) | 118 | (10) | 66 ± 6 | 0.989 |
| 378 > 124 q | 10 | 25 | ||||||||||||
| NIV | 9.90 | 289 > 73 Q | 15 | 35 | 10 | 20 | 78 | (3) | 88 | (1) | 117 | (5) | 97 ± 9 | 0.994 |
| 379 > 73 q | 15 | 35 | ||||||||||||
| NEO | 11.30 | 252 > 195 Q | 10 | 25 | 10 | 20 | 75 | (4) | 80 | (1) | 86 | (9) | 129 ± 3 | 0.999 |
| 252 > 167 q | 15 | 35 | ||||||||||||
| HT-2 | 14.40 | 347 > 185 Q | 10 | 25 | 7.5 | 15 | 100 | (19) | 84 | (5) | 84 | (7) | 111 ± 6 | 0.989 |
| 347 > 157 q | 10 | 25 | ||||||||||||
| T-2 | 14.45 | 350 > 229 Q | 10 | 25 | 2.5 | 5 | 103 | (1) | 107 | (1) | 113 | (5) | 101 ± 1 | 0.989 |
| 350 > 259 q | 15 | 35 | ||||||||||||
| ZEN | 15.46 | 462 > 151 Q | 20 | 25 | 5 | 10 | 69 | (8) | 106 | (8) | 97 | (3) | 64 ± 4 | 0.999 |
| 462 > 333 q | 20 | 25 | ||||||||||||
Figure 1The five Romanian regions included in the study, belonging to different climatic areas: 1. North-West (n = 9), 2. Mideast (n = 9), 3. North Muntenia (n = 31), 4. South Muntenia (n = 37), 5. South-East (n = 16).
Incidence and concentration levels of the mycotoxins detected in the Romanian wheat samples collected during the 2015 harvest year.
| Region | Parameter | Mycotoxin | Co-Occurrence | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DON | 3AcDON | 15AcDON | NIV | HT-2 | ZEN | (%) | Combinations (Number of Samples) | ||
| North-West ( | Frequency (%) | 100 | 22 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 3/9 (33) | DON + 3AcDON + 15AcDON (2) |
| Mean (μg kg−1) | 62.4 | 7.83 | 12.9 | 40 | 41.5 | n.q. | DON + NIV + HT-2 + ZEN (1) | ||
| Range (μg kg−1) | 2.3–323 | 7.83 | 8.9–16.9 | 40 | 41.5 | n.q. | |||
| Mideast ( | Frequency (%) | 89 | 22 | 11 | 22 | 33 | 33 | 5/9 (56) | DON + ZEN (1) |
| Mean (μg kg−1) | 43.5 | 2.7 | n.q. | 63.8 | 46.4 | 42.1 | DON + HT-2 (1) | ||
| Range (μg kg−1) | 1.3–129 | 2.72 | n.q. | 63.3–64.3 | 35.2–67.4 | 23.8–77.7 | DON + NIV + HT-2 (1) | ||
| DON + 3AcDON + 15AcDON + ZEN (1) | |||||||||
| DON + 3AcDON + NIV+HT-2 + ZEN (1) | |||||||||
| North Muntenia ( | Frequency (%) | 68 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 16 | 7/31 (23) | DON + ZEN (3) |
| Mean (μg kg−1) | 66.3 | 12 | 30 | n.q. | 60.8 | 157 | DON + HT-2 (2) | ||
| Range (μg kg−1) | 1.1–955 | 12 | 30 | n.q. | 31.1–98.5 | 12.4–300 | DON + 15AcDON + HT-2 (1) | ||
| DON + 3AcDON + 15AcDON + ZEN (1) | |||||||||
| South Muntenia ( | Frequency (%) | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 19 | 4/37 (11) | DON + ZEN (3) |
| Mean (μg kg−1) | 4.7 | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | 24.7 | 60.9 | DON + HT-2 (1) | ||
| Range (μg kg−1) | 1.2–16.4 | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | 24.7 | 11.7–155 | |||
| South-East ( | Frequency (%) | 38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0/16 (0) | - |
| Mean (μg kg−1) | 5.5 | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | 77.6 | n.q. | |||
| Range (μg kg−1) | 1.1–11 | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | 77.6 | n.q. | |||
| Overall ( | Incidence | 60 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 16 | 19/102 (19) | DON + ZEN (7) |
| LOD–LOQ | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | DON + HT-2 (4) | ||
| Frequency (%) | 59 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 16 | DON + 3AcDON + 15AcDON (2) | ||
| Mean (μg kg−1) | 44.3 | 7.5 | 18.6 | 55.9 | 51.7 | 90.7 | DON + 15AcDON + HT-2 (1) | ||
| Range (μg kg−1) | 1.1–955 | 2.7–12 | 8.9–30 | 40–64.3 | 24.7–98.5 | 11.7–300 | DON + NIV + HT-2 (1) | ||
| ML (μg kg−1) | 1750 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 100 * | 100 | DON + 3AcDON + 15AcDON + ZEN (2) | ||
| DON + NIV + HT-2 + ZEN (1) | |||||||||
| DON + 3AcDON + NIV + HT-2 + ZEN (1) | |||||||||
Co-occurrence: number of samples presenting levels ≥ limit of detection (LOD) for at least two mycotoxins/total samples from that region (the percentage of samples presenting levels ≥ LOD for at least two mycotoxins/total samples from that region); Frequency: the percentage of samples ≥ LOD/total samples; Incidence: number of samples ≥ LOD; LOD–LOQ: number of samples ≥ LOD and ≤ limit of quantification (LOQ); Mean: average of the positive samples; ML: maximum permitted level established by the European regulations for unprocessed wheat [23,28]; *: ML recommended for the sum of HT-2 and T-2 [28]; n.a.: data not available; n.q.: not quantified because no sample was ≥ LOQ.
Fusarium mycotoxin occurrence and levels in wheat in recent surveys in Romania.
| Year | Method | Mycotoxins | LOD | N | Frequency (%) | Range (μg kg−1) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n.a. | GC/MS | DON | n.a. | 42 | 90 | 21–3395 | [ |
| 15AcDON | 36 | 6–99 | |||||
| NIV | 2 | max. 30 | |||||
| DAS | 2 | max. 19 | |||||
| HT-2 | 50 | 3–18 | |||||
| T-2 | 2 | max. 7 | |||||
| 2008 | ELISA | DON | n.a. | 40 | 43 | max. 95.7 | [ |
| ZEN | 10 | max. 5.5 | |||||
| 2009 | ELISA | DON | n.a. | 12 | 83 | 6.1–154.3 | [ |
| ZEN | 50 | 36.7–67.3 | |||||
| 2009 | ELISA | T-2 | n.a. | 2 | 100 | 0.8–1.0 | [ |
| 2008–2010 | ELISA | ZEN | n.a. | 20 | 10 | 0.88–3.6 | [ |
| 2010 | ELISA | DON | 110 | 26 | 73 | 294–3390 | [ |
| ZEN | 22.7 | 69 | 37.6–1000 | ||||
| 2011 | ELISA | DON | 110 | 26 | 19 | 254–1440 | [ |
| ZEN | 22.7 | 77 | 28–105.6 | ||||
| 2012 | ELISA | DON | 18.5 | 831 | 65 | <18.5–5027 | [ |
| 2013 | ELISA | DON | 18.5 | 923 | 53 | <18.5–3602 | [ |
| 2014 | ELISA | ZEN | n.a. | 336 | 5 | 17–80 | [ |
| 2014 | LC-MS/MS | DON | 20 | 31 | 26 | 110–1787 | [ |
| 3AcDON | 20 | 0 | n.q. | ||||
| 15AcDON | 150 | 0 | n.q. | ||||
| NIV | 150 | 0 | n.q. | ||||
| DAS | 30 | 0 | n.q. | ||||
| NEO | 7 | 0 | n.q. | ||||
| HT-2 | 50 | 0 | n.q. | ||||
| T-2 | 75 | 0 | n.q. | ||||
| ZEN | 20 | 13 | 327–1135 | ||||
| 2015 | ELISA | DON | 18.5 | 4 | 50 | <18.5–964 | [ |
LOD: limit of detection reached by the method; Frequency: the percentage of samples ≥ LOD/total samples; N: number of samples; n.a.: data not available; n.q.: not quantified because no sample was ≥ LOD.
Figure 2Normalized mean concentrations of mycotoxins in wheat across the five different Romanian regions. Mean concentrations were normalized by Log10 (1 + a) where a is the average concentration of the positive samples expressed in μg kg−1. When a mycotoxin was not detected in the wheat samples in a region, no normalized value was calculated and a short horizontal line (-) corresponding to that mycotoxin in that region was used.
Figure 3Evolution of (a) monthly mean temperatures; (b) monthly amount of rainfall; and (c) mean of relative humidity in Romania during 2015 (April–August) [37].