| Literature DB >> 35622573 |
Valeria Gagiu1, Elena Mateescu2, Nastasia Belc1, Oana-Alexandra Oprea2, Gina-Pușa Pîrvu1.
Abstract
This article assesses the occurrence of Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDKs) in common wheat (Triticum aestivum) under the influence of environmental factors and extreme weather events in Romania (exceptionally high air temperatures and extreme pedological drought produced by a dipole block in summer 2015, and extreme precipitation and floods produced by an omega block in spring 2016). Wheat samples (N = 272) were analyzed for FDKs via visual estimation and manual weighing according to ISO 7970 and are statistically evaluated using SPSS. The dipole block in 2015 reduced the effects of environmental factors to non-significant correlations with FDKs, while the omega block in 2016 was non-significantly to very significantly correlated with FDKs in the northwestern and western regions. The occurrence of FDKs was favored for wheat cultivation in acidic soils and inhibited in alkaline soils. Wheat samples with FDKs ≥ 1% were sampled from crops grown in river meadows with high and very high risks of flooding. Knowing the contaminants' geographical and spatial distributions under the influence of regular and extreme weather events is important for establishing measures to mitigate the effects of climate change and to ensure human and animal health.Entities:
Keywords: Fusarium head blight (FHB); Vb cyclone; climate change; deoxynivalenol (DON); dipole and omega atmospheric blocks; drought; heavy flood; heavy precipitation; soil; wheat grading
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35622573 PMCID: PMC9145446 DOI: 10.3390/toxins14050326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 5.075
Figure 1Spatial and geographic distributions of precipitation in Europe in 2015 and 2016, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): (a,b) precipitation in May and June in 2015; (c,d) precipitation in May and June in 2016 [22]. Atmospheric blocking events: dipole block in May–August in 2015 [16] and omega block between 26 May and 8 June in 2016 [26,27,28].
Figure 2Spatial and geographic distributions of the air temperatures in Romania in 2015 and 2016: (a,b) average air temperature in May and June 2015; (c) average air temperature in May–June 2015; (d,e) average air temperature in May and June 2016; (f) average air temperature in May–June in 2016.
Figure 3Spatial and geographic distributions of precipitation in Romania in the agricultural years 2015 and 2016: (a,b) cumulative precipitation in May and June 2015; (c) cumulative precipitation in May–June 2015; (d,e) cumulative precipitation in May and June 2016; (f) cumulative precipitation in May–June 2016.
Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDKs) in common wheat by geographic coordinates, soil, historical aridity indices, and county in Romania in 2015 and 2016.
| Agricultural Region | Geographic Coordinates | Aridity Indices, | Soil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||
| No. of Samples, | Interval of FDKs | No. of Samples, | Interval of FDKs | ||||||||||||
| Latitude, | Longitude, | Iar–dM, | CWD, | Chernozem | Phaeozem | Luvisol | Total | ≥0.01% | ≥1% | Total | ≥0.01% | ≥1% | |||
| Dobrogea | 44.6 | 28.5 | 20 | –375 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0.00–0.15 |
| Southern Plain | 44.3 | 26.6 | 26 | –258 | 83.33 | 0 | 16.67 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0.00–0.08 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 0.00–0.85 |
| Moldavia | 46.8 | 26.9 | 28 | –194 | 12.20 | 0.00 | 7.32 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0.00–0.22 | 17 | 14 | 0 | 0.02–0.31 |
| Oltenia Plain | 44.4 | 23.7 | 37 | –167 | 33.33 | 23.33 | 33.33 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0.00–0.21 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0.07–0.52 |
| Western Plain | 46.5 | 22.1 | 33 | –150 | 4.88 | 0.00 | 4.88 | 37 | 24 | 7 | 0.00–3.08 | 20 | 19 | 5 | 0.02–2.04 |
| Southern Hilly Area | 45.1 | 24.7 | 39 | –93 | 2.44 | 0 | 14.63 | 34 | 13 | 1 | 0.00–1.37 | 35 | 32 | 3 | 0.03–1.70 |
| Transylvania | 46.4 | 24.3 | 46 | –32 | 0 | 4.88 | 21.95 | 32 | 27 | 10 | 0.00–21.84 | 37 | 35 | 9 | 0.04–4.92 |
| Romania | 45.7 | 25.2 | 33 | –181 | 39.02 | 7.32 | 53.66 | 135 | 76 | 18 | 0.00–21.84 | 137 | 119 | 17 | 0.00–4.92 |
The maximum limit (ML) of Fusarium-damaged kernels in common wheat is 1% [78].
Figure 4Spatial and geographic distributions of the maximum values of Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDKs) in common wheat in Romania in 2015 and 2016: (a,b) maximum values of FDKs in wheat by county and agricultural region in the dry part of 2015 and the rainy part of 2016; (c) origin of wheat samples with FDKs ≥ 1% in 2015 and 2016.
Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDKs) in common wheat by soil and agricultural year in Romania in 2015 and 2016.
| Soil | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2016 | 2015–2016 | |
| Chernozem | 0.00–5.63 | 0.00–4.92 | 0.00–5.63 |
| Phaeozem | 0.02–21.84 | 0.00–0.56 | 0.00–21.84 |
| Luvisol | 0.00–6.33 | 0.00–2.80 | 0.00–6.33 |
| Romania | 0.00–21.84 | 0.00–4.92 | 0.00–21.84 |
The maximum limit of Fusarium-damaged kernels in common wheat is 1% [78].