| Literature DB >> 30875731 |
Zhi-Guang Zhang1,2, Hui Liu3, Xiao-Xiong Wang4, Jun Zhang5, Miao Yu6,7, Seeram Ramakrishna8, Yun-Ze Long9.
Abstract
Novel flexible and recyclable core-shell heterostructured fibers based on cauliflower-like MoS₂ and TiO₂/Entities:
Keywords: core-shell heterostructure; low temperature; photocatalysis; self-cleaning; visible light
Year: 2019 PMID: 30875731 PMCID: PMC6473952 DOI: 10.3390/nano9030431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic illustration for the synthesis and application process of TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 core-shell heterostructured fibers.
Figure 2XRD patterns of (a) TBOT/PVDF fibers, (b) TiO2/PVDF hybrid fibers, (c) TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 core-shell heterostructured fibers, and (d) MoS2 and TiO2 powders.
Figure 3SEM images of (a) TBOT/PVDF fibers, (b) TiO2/PVDF fibers, (c) TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 fibers, and (d) high resolution SEM image of TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 core-shell heterostructured fibers.
Figure 4TEM image of TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 core-shell heterostructured fiber (a) and high-resolution TEM image of TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 core-shell heterostructured fiber (b).
Figure 5High-resolution XPS spectra of (a) Ti 2p, (b) O 1s, (c) Mo 3d and (d) S 2p in TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 core-shell heterostructured fiber.
Figure 6Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore-diameter distribution curves (inset) of TiO2/PVDF (Black line) and TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 core-shell heterostructured fibers (Red line).
Figure 7UV-vis diffuses reflectance spectra of different samples: P25, PVDF, MoS2/PVDF, TBOT/PVDF, TiO2/PVDF and TiO2/PVDF@MoS2.
The absorption edge and energy band gap for the typical samples.
| Typical Sample | Absorption Edge (nm) | Energy Band Gap (eV) |
|---|---|---|
| MoS2/PVDF | 780.4 | 1.6 |
| TiO2/PVDF@ MoS2 | 639.3 | 1.9 |
| P25 | 375.7 | 3.3 |
| TiO2/PVDF | 361.8 | 3.4 |
| TBOT/PVDF | 335.5 | 3.7 |
Figure 8PL spectra of P25, TiO2/PVDF, MoS2/PVDF and TiO2/PVDF@MoS2.
Figure 9(a) Photocatalytic degradation curves of RhB over the samples: RhB without photocatalyst, P25, TiO2/PVDF, MoS2/PVDF and TiO2/PVDF@MoS2. (b) The wavelength of maximum absorption λmax vs irradiation time. (c) The adsorption of RhB in dark as well as the N-deethylation and cycloreversion of RhB under visible light irradiation for different samples. (d) The degradation performance during 45-min adsorption of RhB in dark and 120-min photocatalytic degradation of RhB with the TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 core-shell heterostructured fibers. The experiment was repeated five times.
Figure 10Photocatalytic degradation curves of LVFX over the samples: LVFX without photocatalyst, TiO2/PVDF, MoS2/PVDF and TiO2/PVDF@MoS2.
Figure 11Control experiments with radical scavengers. (a) The relative concentration variation plots of RhB solution using TiO2/PVDF fibers as the photocatalyst. (b) The relative concentration variation plots of RhB solution using TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 fibers as the photocatalyst.
Figure 12Schematic illustration for the photo-generated electron-hole separation and transfer process between TiO2/PVDF core and MoS2 shell.
Figure 13The optical images taken while the water and dye droplets come into contact to the surface of TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 core-shell heterostructured fibers (a–c). Photographs of the RhB (d–k) and MB (l–s) droplet on the surface of TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 core-shell heterostructured fibers under visible light illumination.