Literature DB >> 30873912

Angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs. endarterectomy compared to best medical treatment: One-year interim results of SPACE-2.

T Reiff1, H H Eckstein2, U Mansmann3, O Jansen4, G Fraedrich5, H Mudra6, D Böckler7, M Böhm8, H Brückmann9, E S Debus10, J Fiehler11, W Lang12, K Mathias13, E B Ringelstein14, J Schmidli15, R Stingele16, R Zahn17, T Zeller18, A Hetzel19, U Bodechtel20, A Binder21, J Glahn22, W Hacke1, P A Ringleb1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of individuals with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is still handled controversially. Recommendations for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are based on trials having recruited patients more than 15 years ago. Registry data indicate that advances in best medical treatment (BMT) may lead to a markedly decreasing risk of stroke in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The aim of the SPACE-2 trial (ISRCTN78592017) was to compare the stroke preventive effects of BMT alone with that of BMT in combination with CEA or carotid artery stenting (CAS), respectively, in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis of ≥70% European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) criteria.
METHODS: SPACE-2 is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, open study. A major secondary endpoint was the cumulative rate of any stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or death from any cause within 30 days plus an ipsilateral ischemic stroke within one year of follow-up. Safety was assessed as the rate of any stroke and death from any cause within 30 days after CEA or CAS. Protocol changes had to be implemented. The results on the one-year period after treatment are reported.
FINDINGS: It was planned to enroll 3550 patients. Due to low recruitment, the enrollment of patients was stopped prematurely after randomization of 513 patients in 36 centers to CEA (n = 203), CAS (n = 197), or BMT (n = 113). The one-year rate of the major secondary endpoint did not significantly differ between groups (CEA 2.5%, CAS 3.0%, BMT 0.9%; p = 0.530) as well as rates of any stroke (CEA 3.9%, CAS 4.1%, BMT 0.9%; p = 0.256) and all-cause mortality (CEA 2.5%, CAS 1.0%, BMT 3.5%; p = 0.304). About half of all strokes occurred in the peri-interventional period. Higher albeit statistically non-significant rates of restenosis occurred in the stenting group (CEA 2.0% vs. CAS 5.6%; p = 0.068) without evidence of increased stroke rates.
INTERPRETATION: The low sample size of this prematurely stopped trial of 513 patients implies that its power is not sufficient to show that CEA or CAS is superior to a modern medical therapy (BMT) in the primary prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with an asymptomatic carotid stenosis up to one year after treatment. Also, no evidence for differences in safety between CAS and CEA during the first year after treatment could be derived. Follow-up will be performed up to five years. Data may be used for pooled analysis with ongoing trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis; best medical treatment; carotid artery stenting; carotid endarterectomy; disease-free survival; epidemiology; primary prevention; prospective study; stroke

Year:  2019        PMID: 30873912     DOI: 10.1177/1747493019833017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  13 in total

1.  Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis in the General Population: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Janelle M Guirguis-Blake; Elizabeth M Webber; Erin L Coppola
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Leo H Bonati; Stavros Kakkos; Joachim Berkefeld; Gert J de Borst; Richard Bulbulia; Alison Halliday; Isabelle van Herzeele; Igor Koncar; Dominick Jh McCabe; Avtar Lal; Jean-Baptiste Ricco; Peter Ringleb; Martin Taylor-Rowan; Hans-Henning Eckstein
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2021-05-11

3.  Stroke incidence between stenting and endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Rahim; Mahmoud Ahmed Thabet; Ali Mahmoud Galal; Mohamed Ibrahim Hammoda; Devender Mittapalli
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-27

4.  Significance of hemodynamic assessment by pressure wire for endovascular therapy of subclavian steal syndrome.

Authors:  Da-Wei Chen; Yu-Hai Gao; Jin Shi; Yan-Wei Yin; Wei-Qing Zhang
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up in Extracranial Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Hans-Henning Eckstein; Andreas Kühnl; Joachim Berkefeld; Holger Lawall; Martin Storck; Dirk Sander
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Treatment strategies for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the era of lipid-lowering drugs: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuesong Bai; Yao Feng; Long Li; Kun Yang; Tao Wang; Jichang Luo; Xue Wang; Feng Ling; Yan Ma; Liqun Jiao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Alison Halliday; Richard Bulbulia; Leo H Bonati; Johanna Chester; Andrea Cradduck-Bamford; Richard Peto; Hongchao Pan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Amaraporn Rerkasem; Saritphat Orrapin; Dominic Pj Howard; Kittipan Rerkasem
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-12

9.  Can risk modelling improve treatment decisions in asymptomatic carotid stenosis?

Authors:  James F Burke; Lewis B Morgenstern; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 10.  The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Francesco Stilo; Nunzio Montelione; Rosalinda Calandrelli; Marisa Distefano; Francesco Spinelli; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Fabio Pilato
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.