Literature DB >> 31969074

Significance of hemodynamic assessment by pressure wire for endovascular therapy of subclavian steal syndrome.

Da-Wei Chen1, Yu-Hai Gao2, Jin Shi1, Yan-Wei Yin1, Wei-Qing Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Subclavian steal syndrome results from hemodynamic impairment due to stenosis or occlusion of subclavian artery. Therefore, it is important for subclavian steal syndrome patients to assess hemodynamic status during endovascular therapy.
METHODS: Eleven subclavian steal syndrome patients undergoing endovascular therapy attended this study. Pressure wire was used to measure trans-stenosis pressure difference (ΔP). Digital subtraction angiography, Transcranial Doppler and Electronic sphygmomanometer were introduced to assess stenotic rate, steal grade and inter-arm systolic pressure difference, respectively. Clinical symptoms and restenosis were followed up after endovascular therapy. The associations of ΔP with stenotic rate, inter-arm pressure difference, steal degree, clinic symptoms and restenosis were analyzed in this paper.
RESULTS: Prior to the therapy, ΔP moderately correlated with stenotic rate (r = 0.757, p = 0.007) and inter-arm pressure difference (r = 0.701, p = 0.016). ΔP was ≥6 mmHg in all patients, and 6-9 mmHg for grade 1 steal and ≥10 mmHg for grade 2 and 3 steals. After the therapy, all patients had technique success, and 10 patients had clinic success, and 1 patient appeared restenosis. ΔP was ≤3 mmHg and steal disappeared in the patients with clinical success. ΔP was 18 mmHg and grade 3 steal still existed in one patient without clinical success. One patient with 1 mmHg of ΔP after therapy appeared restenosis in the follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The trans-stenosis pressure difference is closely related to steal degree and clinical symptoms. The measurement of hemodynamic status by pressure wire is very useful to guide endovascular therapy in subclavian steal syndrome patients. However, the restenosis may still occur, even though the hemodynamic impairment is improved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Subclavian steal syndrome; endovascular therapy; pressure difference; pressure wire; subclavian artery stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31969074      PMCID: PMC7254624          DOI: 10.1177/1591019919897765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  24 in total

1.  Use of a pressure-sensing wire to detect sequential pressure gradients for ipsilateral vertebral and subclavian artery stenoses.

Authors:  Chung-Pin Liu; Yen-Hung Ling; Hsien-Li Kao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Endovascular stenting vs. extrathoracic surgical bypass for symptomatic subclavian steal syndrome.

Authors:  Lipo Song; Jian Zhang; Jianxin Li; Yongquan Gu; Hengxi Yu; Bing Chen; Lianrui Guo; Zhonggao Wang
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 3.  Open and endovascular management of subclavian and innominate arterial pathology.

Authors:  Francesco Aiello; Nicholas J Morrissey
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Long-term treatment outcomes after intravascular ultrasound evaluation and stent placement for atherosclerotic subclavian artery obstructive lesions.

Authors:  Takeshi Wada; Katsutoshi Takayama; Toshiaki Taoka; Hiroyuki Nakagawa; Kaoru Myouchin; Toshiteru Miyasaka; Toshiaki Akashi; Masahiko Sakamoto; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2014-04-18

Review 5.  Multimodality Imaging and Endovascular Treatment Options of Subclavian Steal Syndrome.

Authors:  Vasileios Rafailidis; Xin Li; Ioannis Chryssogonidis; Fabian Rengier; Prabhakar Rajiah; Carola M Wieker; Sanjeeva Kalva; Suvranu Ganguli; Sasan Partovi
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.248

6.  Determinants of long-term outcome in patients after percutaneous stent-assisted management of symptomatic subclavian or innominate artery stenosis or occlusion.

Authors:  Tadeusz Przewlocki; Leszek Wrotniak; Anna Kablak-Ziembicka; Piotr Pieniazek; Agnieszka Roslawiecka; Daniel Rzeznik; Marcin Misztal; Wojciech Zajdel; Rafal Badacz; Andrzej Sokolowski; Mariusz Trystula; Piotr Musialek; Krzysztof Zmudka
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 6.534

Review 7.  Subclavian Steal Syndrome with or without Arterial Stenosis: A Review.

Authors:  Odysseas Kargiotis; Simos Siahos; Apostolos Safouris; Agisilaos Feleskouras; Georgios Magoufis; Georgios Tsivgoulis
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Long-term results of endovascular therapy for proximal subclavian arterial obstructive lesions.

Authors:  Ke-qin Wang; Zhong-gao Wang; Bao-zhong Yang; Chao Yuan; Wang-de Zhang; Biao Yuan; Tong Xing; Sheng-han Song; Tan Li; Chuan-jun Liao; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Endovascular recanalization of the chronically occluded brachiocephalic and subclavian arteries: technical considerations and an argument for embolic protection.

Authors:  Felipe C Albuquerque; Azam Ahmed; Alim Mitha; Michael Stiefel; Cameron G McDougall
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.104

10.  Advanced Imaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis: Lessons from Interventional Cardiology.

Authors:  Davor Pavlin-Premrl; Rahul Sharma; Bruce C V Campbell; J Mocco; Nicholas L Opie; Thomas J Oxley
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.