Literature DB >> 30873521

Palatability in pigs, the pleasure of consumption1.

Jaime Figueroa1, Daniela Frías1, David Solà-Oriol2, Tamara Tadich3, Rosa Franco-Rosselló1, Valentina Nuñez3, Dominic M Dwyer4.   

Abstract

Despite the importance of hedonic reactions in pig's intake, feed palatability has been typically inferred from preference or acceptance measures. However, these measures are influenced by factors beyond palatability, such as energy density and hunger. The aim of this study was to evaluate palatability responses in pigs to sweet and umami taste at different inclusions levels. Pigs (24 per experiment) were video recorded while exposed in pairs to different sucrose (Exp. 1) or monosodium glutamate (MSG, Exp. 2) solutions over seven consecutive 10 min tests (one concentration per day). In both experiments, palatability was estimated through consumption patterns (consumption time per approaches, CT/A), facial expressions (snout openings and tongue protrusions), and consumption during a brief 2 min period. Data were analyzed by sucrose or MSG concentration. Sucrose concentration affected total intake, producing an inverted-U function and a quadratic relationship with sucrose concentration (P = 0.012). In contrast, CT/A and snout openings showed a dose effect (P < 0.005) with a direct correlation between sucrose concentration and CT/A (R = 0.23, P = 0.033) but not for openings (R = 0.18, P = 0.105) where a quadratic relationship appears (P < 0.001). Tongue protrusions and brief consumption time were not affected by sucrose concentration (P = 0.144 and 0.205, respectively). MSG concentration affected consumption, CT/A, snout openings, and brief consumption time (P < 0.001), with significant (P < 0.001) positive correlations (R = 0.59, 0.56, 0.56, and 0.68), respectively. As with rats, CT/A appears to provide a novel and interesting measure reflecting the palatability of preferred ingredients in pigs. However, brief consumption time and orofacial reactions show less similarity between pigs and rodents. Thus further studies are necessary both to better understand the measurement methods themselves and relationship between hedonic reactions and simple consumption in pigs.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brief intake; consumption pattern; palatability; pigs; reactivity test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30873521      PMCID: PMC6488332          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  21 in total

1.  Measuring gustatory variation in mice: a short-term fluid-intake test.

Authors:  B S Kotlus; D A Blizard
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1998-04

2.  Response of pigs to bitter-tasting compounds.

Authors:  S L Nelson; J D Sanregret
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Flavour preferences conditioned by protein solutions in post-weaning pigs.

Authors:  Jaime Figueroa; David Solà-Oriol; Elizabeth Borda; Anthony Sclafani; José Francisco Pérez
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-09-05

4.  Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates.

Authors:  J E Steiner; D Glaser; M E Hawilo; K C Berridge
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Microstructural analysis of ingestive behaviour reveals no contribution of palatability to the incomplete extinction of a conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Flavor programming during infancy.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Cara E Griffin; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Inverse association between the effect of carbohydrates on blood glucose and subsequent short-term food intake in young men.

Authors:  G Harvey Anderson; Nicole L A Catherine; Dianne M Woodend; Thomas M S Wolever
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Reinforcement value of sucrose measured by progressive ratio operant licking in the rat.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2003-09

9.  The taste reactivity test. I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats.

Authors:  H J Grill; R Norgren
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-03-24       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  EPS Prize Lecture. Licking and liking: the assessment of hedonic responses in rodents.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Expanding Aesthetics.

Authors:  Fiona French
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Sucrose Inclusion in Gestating and Lactating Diets of Sows Modifies the Feeding Behavior of Post-Weaning Pigs for Sweet Solutions.

Authors:  Jaime Figueroa; Carolina Valenzuela; Sergio A Guzmán-Pino
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  Horses' Response to a Novel Diet: Different Herbs Added to Dry, Wet or Wet-Sweetened Oats.

Authors:  Anna Stachurska; Ewelina Tkaczyk; Monika Różańska-Boczula; Wiktoria Janicka; Iwona Janczarek
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Dietary Inclusion of Monosodium Glutamate in Gestating and Lactating Sows Modifies the Preference Thresholds and Sensory-Motivated Intake for Umami and Sweet Solutions in Post-Weaned Pigs.

Authors:  Sergio A Guzmán-Pino; Cristian Lazcano; Valeria De Luca; Jaime Figueroa; Carolina Valenzuela; Eugeni Roura
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Exploring Anhedonia in Kennelled Dogs: Could Coping Styles Affect Hedonic Preferences for Sweet and Umami Flavours?

Authors:  Daniela Luna; Carolina Carrasco; Daniela Álvarez; Catalina González; Juan Ignacio Egaña; Jaime Figueroa
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Plasticity of feeding behaviour traits in response to production environment (temperate vs. tropical) in group-housed growing pigs.

Authors:  Nausicaa Poullet; Wendy M Rauw; David Renaudeau; Juliette Riquet; Mario Giorgi; Yvon Billon; Hélène Gilbert; Jean-Luc Gourdine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of dietary sweeteners supplementation on growth performance, serum biochemicals, and jejunal physiological functions of broiler chickens.

Authors:  Jingle Jiang; Siyi Liu; Tuniyaz Jamal; Tengxin Ding; Lina Qi; Zengpeng Lv; Debing Yu; Fangxiong Shi
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.