| Literature DB >> 30873235 |
Constantinos G Neochoritis1, Maryam Kazemi Miraki2, Eman M M Abdelraheem1, Ewa Surmiak3, Tryfon Zarganes-Tzitzikas1, Beata Łabuzek3, Tad A Holak3, Alexander Dömling1.
Abstract
Macrocycles were designed to antagonize the protein-protein interaction p53-MDM2 based on the three-finger pharmacophore F19W23L25. The synthesis was accomplished by a rapid, one-pot synthesis of indole-based macrocycles based on Ugi macrocyclization. The reaction of 12 different α,ω-amino acids and different indole-3-carboxaldehyde derivatives afforded a unique library of macrocycles otherwise difficult to access. Screening of the library for p53-MDM2 inhibition by fluorescence polarization and 1H,15N HSQC NMR measurements confirm MDM2 binding.Entities:
Keywords: 1H,15N HSQC NMR; Ugi reaction; indole; macrocycles; multicomponent; p53-MDM2
Year: 2019 PMID: 30873235 PMCID: PMC6404402 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.15.45
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Scheme 1MCR approach to indole-based macrocycles; a more effective strategy is proposed in this work, based on α,ω-amino acids and an Ugi macrocyclization.
Scheme 2Reaction of unprotected diamines 3 with cyclic anhydrides 4 at rt affording α,ω-amino acids 5 in quantitative yields.
Scheme 3Ugi macrocyclization in a one-pot fashion and synthesis of diverse indole-based macrocycles. The circle depicts the size number of the macrocycle.
Figure 1(A) Modeling of the macrocycle 2h (cyan sticks) and 2n (magenta sticks) into the MDM2 receptor (PDB ID: 1YCR); (B) 2D structure of 2h with the substituents targeting the subpockets of MDM2; (C) Analysis of the synthesized macrocycles probing the subpockets of MDM2 and expansion of the chemistry compared to previous studies [13].
Measurement of Ki and Kd of the selected macrocycles based on FP and 1H,15N HSQC NMR assays, respectively.a
| Entry | Name | Structure | ||
| 1 | 2.3 | 12.1 ± 8.5 | ||
| 2 | 5.5 | 4.8 ± 1.5 | ||
| 3 | 316 | 17.2 ± 3.8 | ||
| 4 | n.a. | 8.9 ± 1.2 | ||
an.a. no activity against MDM2 protein. Ki and Kd values were calculated based on fluorescence polarization binding and 1H,15N HSQC NMR assay, respectively.
Figure 2(A) Overlay of 1 H,15N-HSQC spectra of the reference MDM2 (red) and the titration steps with the 2i inhibitor. MDM2/2i ratios 4:1 (orange), 4:2 (yellow), 4:3 (green), 1:1 (light blue), 1:2 (blue), 1:5 (purple). Examples of most perturbed residues are labeled on the spectrum. (B) Normalized chemical shift perturbations (δo) of MDM2 residue (calculated according to Stoll et al. [41]). Residue with δo equal 0 are either despairing from MDM2 spectrum upon titration or cannot be identified. (C) Chemical shift perturbations plotted onto the structure of MDM2 (wheat); orange (despairing – indicating stronger binding), light orange (>0.1 ppm), yellow (0.05–0.1 ppm). Residues which disappear upon titration experiment are labeled on the Mdm2 surface.