| Literature DB >> 30871013 |
Ion Cristóbal1,2, Blanca Torrejón3,4, Jaime Rubio5,6, Andrea Santos7, Manuel Pedregal8,9, Cristina Caramés10,11, Sandra Zazo12, Melani Luque13, Marta Sanz-Alvarez14, Juan Madoz-Gúrpide15, Federico Rojo16, Jesús García-Foncillas17,18.
Abstract
SET nuclear proto-oncogene (SET) deregulation is a novel molecular target in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its role in CRC progression and its potential clinical impact in early-stage CRC patients remain unknown. Here, we studied the biological effects of SET on migration using wound-healing and transwell assays, and anchorage-independent cell growth using soft agar colony formation assays after ectopic SET modulation. SET was analyzed by immuno-staining in 231 early-stage CRC patients, and miR-199b expression was quantified by real-time PCR in a set of CRC patients. Interestingly, SET enhances cell migration, markedly affects the colony-forming ability, promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition, and induces the expression of the MYC proto-oncogene (c-MYC) in CRC cells. SET overexpression was detected in 15.4% of cases and was associated with worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (p = 0.021) and relapse in stage-II CRC patients (p = 0.008). Moreover, SET overexpression predicted shorter overall survival (p < 0.001) and time to metastasis (p < 0.001), and its prognostic value was particularly evident in elderly patients. MiR-199b downregulation was identified as a molecular mechanism to deregulate SET in patients with localized disease. In conclusion, SET overexpression is a common alteration in early-stage CRC, playing an oncogenic role associated with progression and aggressiveness, and portends a poor outcome. Thus, SET emerges as a novel potential molecular target with clinical impact in early-stage in CRC.Entities:
Keywords: SET; early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC); protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A)
Year: 2019 PMID: 30871013 PMCID: PMC6463201 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8030346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1SET modulates cell migration in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. Wound-healing assay showing migration in SW480 cells after ectopic (A) SET silencing or (B) SET overexpression. Dashed lines represent the migration border; OE: Overexpression; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2SET silencing inhibits transwell migration in CRC cells. Transwell migration assay in SW480 and HT-29 cells after SET silencing; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3SET deregulation affects CRC colony-forming ability. Colony-forming assays showing the effect of SET silencing and SET overexpression on the anchorage-independent cell growth of HT-29 cells; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Association between SET and clinical and molecular parameters in 247 CRC patients without metastatic disease at diagnosis.
| No. Cases | No. SET Low (%) | No. SET High (%) |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SET | 247 | 209 (84.6) | 38 (15.4) | |||
| Sex | 247 | 209 | 38 | 0.674 | ||
| Male | 155 | 130 | (83.9) | 25 | (16.1) | |
| Female | 92 | 79 | (85.9) | 13 | (14.1) | |
| Age | 236 | 199 | 37 | 0.349 | ||
| <70 | 86 | 70 | (81.4) | 16 | (18.6) | |
| >70 | 150 | 129 | (86) | 21 | (14) | |
| ECOG | 223 | 190 | 33 |
| ||
| 0–1 | 205 | 178 | (86.8) | 27 | (13.2) | |
| 2–3 | 18 | 12 | (66.7) | 6 | (33.3) | |
| T | 247 | 209 | 38 | 0.824 | ||
| 1 | 7 | 6 | (85.7) | 1 | (14.3) | |
| 2 | 48 | 43 | (89.6) | 5 | (10.4) | |
| 3 | 155 | 128 | (82.6) | 27 | (17.4) | |
| 4 | 29 | 25 | (86.2) | 4 | (13.8) | |
| x | 8 | 7 | (87.5) | 1 | (12.5) | |
| N | 247 | 209 | 38 | 0.421 | ||
| 0 | 117 | 102 | (87.2) | 15 | (12.8) | |
| 1 | 67 | 56 | (83.6) | 11 | (16.4) | |
| 2 | 44 | 34 | (77.3) | 10 | (22.7) | |
| x | 19 | 17 | (89.5) | 2 | (10.5) | |
| Stage | 247 | 208 | 38 | 0.302 | ||
| I–II | 117 | 102 | (87.2) | 15 | (12.8) | |
| III | 130 | 107 | (82.3) | 23 | (17.7) | |
| Site of primary tumor | 241 | 203 | 38 | 0.699 | ||
| Colon | 165 | 140 | (84.8) | 25 | (15.2) | |
| Rectum | 76 | 63 | (82.9) | 13 | (17.1) | |
| Progression (local or distant) | 247 | 209 | 38 | 0.144 | ||
| No | 156 | 136 | (87.2) | 20 | (12.8) | |
| Yes | 91 | 73 | (80.2) | 18 | (19.8) | |
Association between SET and progression (local or distant) in 207 stages II-III CRC patients.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Progression | 77 | 66 | 11 |
| ||
| No | 59 | 54 | (81.8) | 5 | (45.5) | |
| Yes | 18 | 12 | (18.2) | 6 | (54.5) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Progression | 130 | 107 | 23 | 0.882 | ||
| No | 64 | 53 | (49.5) | 11 | (47.8) | |
| Yes | 66 | 54 | (50.5) | 12 | (52.2) | |
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier analyses for SET expression in early-stage CRC patients: (A) Overall survival; and (B) time to metastasis (n = 87).
Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses in the cohort of 149 patients with early-stage CRC.
| Univariate OS Analysis | Multivariate OS Cox Analysis | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI |
| HR | 95% CI |
| ||||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Age | 0.319 | - | |||||||
| <70 | 1.000 | ||||||||
| >70 | 1.352 | 0.747 to 2.445 | - | - | |||||
| Stage |
| 0.235 | |||||||
| II | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||||||
| III | 3.421 | 1.540 to 7.601 | 1.956 | 0.646 to 5.926 | |||||
| ECOG |
|
| |||||||
| 0–1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||||||
| 2–3 | 2.797 | 1.975 to 3.961 | 2.653 | 1.845 to 3.814 | |||||
| T |
| 0.057 | |||||||
| 1–2 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||||||
| >2 | 1.785 | 1.226 to 2.599 | 1.488 | 0.989 to 2.240 | |||||
| N |
| 0.275 | |||||||
| 0–1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||||||
| 2–x | 1.599 | 1.223 to 2.091 | 1.263 | 0.830 to 1.921 | |||||
| SET |
|
| |||||||
| No | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||||||
| Yes | 2.873 | 1.547 to 5.335 | 2.387 | 1.229 to 4.634 | |||||
OS: overall survival; CI: confidence interval, and HR: hazard-ratio. Bold: p < 0.01.