Stephanie A Prince1,2, Gregory P Butler1, Deepa P Rao1, Wendy Thompson1. 1. Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 2. Division of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Geographical positioning systems (GPS) have the capacity to provide further context around where physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST) are accrued especially when overlaid onto objectively measured movement. The objective of this rapid review was to summarize evidence from location-based studies which employed the simultaneous use of GPS and objective measures of PA and/or ST. METHODS: Six databases were searched to identify studies that employed the simultaneous use of GPS and objective measures of PA or ST to quantify location of movement. Risk of bias was assessed, and a qualitative synthesis completed. RESULTS: Searching identified 3446 articles; 59 were included in the review. A total of 22 studies in children, 17 in youth and 20 in adults were captured. The active transportation environment emerged as an important location for moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) in children, youth and adults. In children and youth, the school is an important location for MVPA, especially the schoolyard for children. Indoor locations (e.g., schools, homes) appear to be greater sources of lighter intensities of PA and ST. The review was limited by a lack of standardization in the nomenclature used to describe the locations and methods, as well as measures of variance. CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests that the active transportation environment is a potentially important contributor of MVPA across an individual's lifespan. There is a need for future location-based studies to report on locations of all intensity of movement (including minutes and proportion) using a whole-day approach in larger representative samples.
INTRODUCTION: Geographical positioning systems (GPS) have the capacity to provide further context around where physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST) are accrued especially when overlaid onto objectively measured movement. The objective of this rapid review was to summarize evidence from location-based studies which employed the simultaneous use of GPS and objective measures of PA and/or ST. METHODS: Six databases were searched to identify studies that employed the simultaneous use of GPS and objective measures of PA or ST to quantify location of movement. Risk of bias was assessed, and a qualitative synthesis completed. RESULTS: Searching identified 3446 articles; 59 were included in the review. A total of 22 studies in children, 17 in youth and 20 in adults were captured. The active transportation environment emerged as an important location for moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) in children, youth and adults. In children and youth, the school is an important location for MVPA, especially the schoolyard for children. Indoor locations (e.g., schools, homes) appear to be greater sources of lighter intensities of PA and ST. The review was limited by a lack of standardization in the nomenclature used to describe the locations and methods, as well as measures of variance. CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests that the active transportation environment is a potentially important contributor of MVPA across an individual's lifespan. There is a need for future location-based studies to report on locations of all intensity of movement (including minutes and proportion) using a whole-day approach in larger representative samples.
Entities:
Keywords:
active transportation; built environment; location; motor activity; sedentary time
Authors: Nathan M Jones; Meghan McDonnell; Emily Sparer-Fine; Bernard Rosner; Jack T Dennerlein; Stefanos Kales; Carmen Messerlian Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 2.306
Authors: Larisa Lotoski; Daniel Fuller; Kevin G Stanley; Daniel Rainham; Nazeem Muhajarine Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Chelsea L Kracht; Robbie A Beyl; Jaclyn P Maher; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Amanda E Staiano Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Anne Kelso; Anne K Reimers; Karim Abu-Omar; Kathrin Wunsch; Claudia Niessner; Hagen Wäsche; Yolanda Demetriou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Valentin Benzing; Sanaz Nosrat; Alireza Aghababa; Vassilis Barkoukis; Dmitriy Bondarev; Yu-Kai Chang; Boris Cheval; Muhammet Cihat Çiftçi; Hassan M Elsangedy; Maria Luisa M Guinto; Zhijian Huang; Martin Kopp; Hafrún Kristjánsdóttir; Garry Kuan; Luca Mallia; Dadi Rafnsson; Gledson Tavares Amorim Oliveira; Arto J Pesola; Caterina Pesce; Noora J Ronkainen; Sinika Timme; Ralf Brand Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Paul McCrorie; Rich Mitchell; Laura Macdonald; Andrew Jones; Emma Coombes; Jasper Schipperijn; Anne Ellaway Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Fernando Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Francisco Javier Huertas-Delgado; Yaira Barranco-Ruiz; María Jesús Aranda-Balboa; Palma Chillón Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-20 Impact factor: 3.390