| Literature DB >> 30867905 |
Bo Zhang1, Dongmei Ban1, Xiao Gou2, Yawen Zhang1, Lin Yang1, Yangzom Chamba3, Hao Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tibetan pigs, which inhabit the Tibetan Plateau, exhibit distinct phenotypic and physiological characteristics from those of lowland pigs and have adapted well to the extreme conditions at high altitude. However, the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of hypoxic adaptation in animals remain unclear.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; Hypoxic adaptation; MeDIP-seq; Tibetan pig
Year: 2019 PMID: 30867905 PMCID: PMC6397503 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-019-0316-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Information on methylation peaks in the four groups of pigs
| Samples | Number of peaks | Mean peak length | Median peak length | Total peak length | Peak covered size in genome, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TH | 280678 | 1199.23 | 995 | 336598369 | 11.99 |
| YH | 287224 | 1253.43 | 1027 | 360015941 | 12.82 |
| TL | 259066 | 1135.53 | 943 | 294176561 | 10.47 |
| YL | 332078 | 1273.89 | 1045 | 423031970 | 15.06 |
TH Tibetan highland pig, YH Yorkshire highland pig, TL Tibetan lowland pig, YL Yorkshire lowland pig
Numbers of DMRs revealed by four pairwise comparisons
| Comparison groups | Total DMRs | Hypermethylated DMRs | Hypomethylated DMRs | DMGs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TH vs. YH | 6829 | 2694 (39.45%) | 4135 (60.55%) | 384 |
| TL vs. YL | 11997 | 2464 (20.54%) | 9533 (79.46%) | 619 |
| TH vs. TL | 2828 | 1932 (68.32%) | 896 (31.68%) | 192 |
| YH vs. YL | 1286 | 587 (45.65%) | 699 (54.35%) | 92 |
TH Tibetan highland pig, YH Yorkshire highland pig, TL Tibetan lowland pig, YL Yorkshire lowland pig
Methylation ratios of CpG sites and Fisher’s exact P values for the five selected genes
| Gene | TH | YH | TL | YL | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Methylated | 113 | 97 | 108 | 96 | 0.0029 | 0.0457 | 0.3329 | 1.0000 |
| Unmethylated | 7 | 23 | 12 | 24 | |||||
| Methylated ratio | 0.9417 | 0.8083 | 0.9000 | 0.8000 | |||||
|
| Methylated | 133 | 146 | 129 | 148 | 0.3200 | 0.0500 | 0.5200 | 0.9100 |
| Unmethylated | 62 | 54 | 70 | 52 | |||||
| Methylated ratio | 0.6821 | 0.7300 | 0.6482 | 0.7400 | |||||
|
| Methylated | 104 | 108 | 96 | 96 | 0.0300 | 0.2463 | 1.0000 | 0.5085 |
| Unmethylated | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | |||||
| Methylated ratio | 1.0000 | 0.9474 | 1.0000 | 0.9697 | |||||
|
| Methylated | 279 | 295 | 268 | 244 | 0.0160 | 0.7000 | 1.05E-05 | 0.0970 |
| Unmethylated | 27 | 52 | 73 | 62 | |||||
| Methylated ratio | 0.9118 | 0.8501 | 0.7859 | 0.7974 | |||||
|
| Methylated | 75 | 66 | 62 | 71 | 0.0483 | 0.1301 | 0.0098 | 0.3677 |
| Unmethylated | 5 | 14 | 16 | 9 | |||||
| Methylated ratio | 0.9375 | 0.8250 | 0.7949 | 0.8875 |
Fig. 1Gene Ontology (GO) terms enriched in DMGs identified by comparison of TH vs. YH, TL vs. YL, TH vs. TL and YH vs. YL. The X-axis indicates GO enrichment, and Y-axis indicates GO terms
Fig. 2KyotoEncyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways enriched in DMGs identified by comparison of TH vs. YH, TL vs. YL, TH vs. TL and YH vs. YL. The X-axis indicates the pathway terms and Y-axis indicates KEGG pathway enrichment
Key differentially methylated genes possibly related to hypoxic adaption in Tibetan pigs
| Gene | Description | TH vs. YH | TL vs. YL | TH vs. TL | YH vs. YL | Functional annotation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| AKT serine/threonine kinase 3 | + | – | – | – | HIF-1 signaling pathway, VEGF signaling pathway, pathways in cancer |
|
| Angiopoietin 2 | + | + | + | – | Angiogenesis, HIF-1 signaling pathway |
|
| Catalase | + | – | – | – | Oxygen species, apoptosis process, mitochondrion |
|
| Cluster of differentiation 38 | + | + | + | + | Calcium signaling pathway |
|
| Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E family member 2 | + | – | – | – | HIF-1 signaling pathway, mTOR signaling pathway, insulin signaling pathway |
|
| Endothelial PAS domain protein 1 | + | + | – | – | Angiogenesis, mitochondrion, response to hypoxia |
|
| ETS transcription factor-related gene | + | + | + | + | Cell differentiation |
|
| Fas associated via death domain | + | – | – | – | Apoptosis, pathways in cancer |
|
| Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 | + | + | – | + | Angiogenesis, Pathways in cancer |
|
| Forkhead box O1 | + | + | – | – | Apoptotic process, response to hyperoxia |
|
| Growth factor receptor bound protein 2 | + | – | – | – | MAPK signaling pathway, insulin signaling pathway, pathways in cancer |
|
| Hexokinase 2 | + | + | – | – | HIF-1 signaling pathway |
|
| Porcine inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase | + | + | + | – | HIF-1 signaling pathway |
|
| Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor | + | + | – | – | Apoptosis process, HIF-1 signaling pathway |
|
| Interleukin 6 receptor | + | – | – | – | HIF-1 signaling pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway |
|
| KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase | + | + | – | – | Inflammatory response, ATP binding, pathways in cancer |
|
| Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 | + | – | + | – | HIF-1 signaling pathway, VEGF signaling pathway |
|
| SMAD family member 2 | + | – | – | – | TGF-beta signaling pathway |
|
| Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B | + | – | – | – | Apoptosis process, erythrocyte differentiation, pathways in cancer |
Note: “+” represents differentially methylated genes in some comparisons. “-” represents no differentially methylated genes. TH, Tibetan highland pig; YH, Yorkshire highland pig; TL, Tibetan lowland pig; YL, Yorkshire lowland pig