Growth in syphilis-exposed and -unexposed uninfected children from birth to 18 months of age in China: a longitudinal study.

Early infant growth and development has attracted worldwide attention. Although numerous studies have demonstrated that maternal syphilis increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and congenital syphilis, the subsequent growth pattern and morbidity of syphilis-exposed uninfected infants are less understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare the growth pattern and disease distribution of syphilis-exposed and syphilis-unexposed uninfected children, and World Health Organization (WHO) reference standards from birth to 18 months of age. We obtained data from a prospective cohort study in three representative regions of Zhejiang Province in China. A total of 333 syphilis-uninfected children born to women with syphilis were recruited at birth and matched with 333 syphilis-uninfected children born to women without syphilis during pregnancy. Children were followed-up by medical staff every 3 months until 18 months of age. The mixed-effects model was used to compare changes in growth patterns and influencing factors between the two groups. Mean weight, length, and head circumference of children, as well as disease prevalence, were similar between the groups. Multilevel analysis indicated that, after controlling confounders, growth velocities were comparable in both weight and length measures from birth to 18 months old between the two groups; however, low birth weight had a negative impact on weight gain in both groups. There was no significant negative association between syphilis exposure and early growth and health in children, under 18 months in a setting with universal coverage of therapeutic interventions for maternal syphilis. These findings may contribute to improving prevention efforts for mother-to-child transmission of syphilis, such as early screening for syphilis in pregnant women, universal coverage of treatment, and interventions for exposed children. Children with low birth weight should be given priority as this is a risk factor for weight gain.

Introduction

Early infant growth and development play a crucial role in the future health of children. The determinants of infant growth patterns include preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), maternal characteristics and nutrition, maternal pregnancy indications, infant nutrition, and diseases[1-5]. Although numerous studies have demonstrated that maternal syphilis increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and congenital syphilis, the subsequent growth pattern and health of infants born to women with syphilis are less well known[6-8]. Currently, considerable research is focused on the growth pattern and health of infants exposed to HIV or HBV[9-14], in addition to some follow-up studies on congenital syphilis. However, these studies are mainly restricted to disease incidence[15,16].

There has been a significant reduction in congenital syphilis, and the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis has been advocated globally[17,18]. Insight into the long-term growth and health of children exposed to syphilis but uninfected is increasingly necessary with the success of effective interventions. There is a significant effort in China to prevent maternal syphilis[19,20]. A national public project for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis in China was initiated in 2010[20]. In 2017, the Chinese government implemented a program to eliminate the transmission of syphilis s from mother-to-child in pilot areas. Zhejiang Province is located in eastern China, and the prevalence of syphilis during pregnancy in this province is 0.3%[7]. We previously reported that women with adequate treatment had reduced risk of preterm birth and perinatal disease compared with inadequately treated mothers[7]. Nevertheless, the effects of syphilis in pregnancy on children’s early growth and health are not fully understood. In this research, we conducted a longitudinal study to compare the growth level, growth velocity, and disease incidence between syphilis-exposed and -unexposed uninfected infants, to provide a reference for estimating the effects of syphilis exposure on early growth and health of children.

Methods

Study design and participants

This was a longitudinal study using data from a prospective cohort study conducted in three representative cities of Zhejiang Province, China: Jiaxing, Lishui, and Quzhou. The areas were chosen based mainly on the prevalence of gestational syphilis, economic development level, and location. Women diagnosed with syphilis infection in the first trimester during 2014–2015 were included in the study and were matched 1:1 with uninfected women according to maternal age (±5 years) and expected date of delivery (±1 month). We excluded women that were nonresidents or had previous miscarriages, abortions, stillbirths, or multiple births. Children born to these women were followed up until 18 months old. In this study, gestational syphilis was defined as a positive result from both the Toluidine Red Unheated Serum Test (TRUST)/syphilis rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA)/pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA) tests during pregnancy. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval was obtained for this study from the Women’s Hospital School of Medicine at Zhejiang University (2016-0005). All participants included in the study provided their written informed consent. For the participants under the age of 18 years, informed consent was obtained from a parent and/or legal guardian.

The project of Prevention of Mother-to-child Transmission of Syphilis

China has initiated a national project of prevention of mother-to-children transmission of syphilis. All pregnant women are required to have syphilis screening during their first antenatal care and at delivery. Positive results in both TRUST/RPR and TPPA/TPHA tests indicated gestational syphilis. Women with high risk for syphilis were provided with more frequent screening. Syphilis-positive pregnant women were recommended to immediately have at least two courses of penicillin treatment. Women allergic to penicillin were provided with ceftriaxone as a replacement. Syphilis-positive pregnant women and their infants were routinely followed up by medical staff in local women and children hospitals. We performed congenital syphilis screening for children born to syphilis-positive women at delivery and every three months after birth until 18 months old. Congenital syphilis in an infant was defined as one of the following situations: a 4-fold higher serum titer than that of their mother’s at delivery, laboratory confirmation of Treponema pallidum in clinical specimens by dark-field microscopy, or reactive treponemal antibody test for IgM. All laboratory tests were performed according to national guideline with routine quality controls for reducing false positive or negative outcomes.

Data collection

A questionnaire was used for data collection. The data included maternal information (age, education, marriage, employment, gravidity, parity, and family income), and children’s information (birth information, disease records, and growth indicators). Maternal and children’s birth information were surveyed by specially trained medical staff in face-to-face interviews at local maternal and child health hospitals. In the follow-up period, children’s weight, length, head circumference, and disease occurrence were also determined and recorded by pediatricians at local maternal and child health hospitals. To assure consistency of the measurement technique, medical staff was trained in conducting the physical examination, taking anthropometric measurements in triplicate, calibrating weighing scales, completing the questionnaires and collecting data. They were routinely trained in Good Clinical Practice similar to methods described by Gibson[21], and provided with specialized training for this project.

Statistical analysis

Data were double-entered into Epidata 2.0 and analyzed using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Significance was considered as P < 0.05. We used t-tests to compare mean weight, length, and head circumference at birth and at different time points and velocities, and for continuous sociodemographic variables between syphilis-exposed and -unexposed uninfected children. We also used one sample t-tests to compared weight, length, and head circumference for children born to women with syphilis using World Health Organization (WHO) reference standards for different months of age[22]. The Pearson’s χ2 test was used to examine differences in the distribution of disease and categorical sociodemographic variables. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for family income.

We established mixed-effects models, controlling for potential confounders to estimate each child’s growth trajectory at monthly intervals. The mixed-effects model is the extension of typical linear regression analysis, which includes random effects in the structure of the mean rather than only fixed effects, and can effectively handle repeated measurements data[23]. Let i indicate each measurement at level 1, let j indicate each participant or infant at level 2, and the model is as follows:

The response variable y was either the weight or length measurement. The following variables were included as independent variables: Age (polynomial age/month), Group (children’s exposure condition; 1 = syphilis-exposed, uninfected, 2 = unexposed, uninfected), Sex (children’s sex; 1 = boy, 2 = girl), (Group × Age) and (Sex × Age) interaction terms, and other covariates X (maternal education, family income, and underweight at birth), with the random effects on intercept and Age. The variables u0j, u1j, and u2j were random effects at participant level (level 2), and e0 was the general random error at measurement level (level 1). We attempted to include the interaction terms of sex and age in the mixed-effects models because we expected that growth velocities would differ over time between the different sexes. The interaction terms of group and age were added to the models to examine whether syphilis exposure affected growth of children. To better fit the growth pattern over time, we only used data with more than two measurements when building the models.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of women and their children included in the study. There was a total of 666 children, including 333 children born to syphilis-positive women and 333 born to syphilis-negative women. The average maternal age was 28.23 ± 5.45 years for syphilis-infected women and 28.44 ± 5.36 years for those uninfected (t = −0.50, P = 0.62). Although a larger proportion of syphilis-positive women exhibited high parity compared with syphilis-negative women, it did not reach significance (χ2 = 2.60, P = 0.27). An increased proportion of women with syphilis had primary-level education (χ2 = 125.38, P < 0.01), increased gravidity (χ2 = 39.09, P < 0.01), unstable marital status (χ2 = 10.33, P < 0.01), and unemployment (χ2 = 18.56, P < 0.01) than women without syphilis. In addition, average family income was higher in women without syphilis than those with syphilis (t = −2.92, P < 0.01). Compared with infants born to syphilis-positive women, infants born to women uninfected with syphilis had a similar sex distribution (χ2 = 0.92, P = 0.34), and mean birth weight (t = 0.21, P = 0.83) and length (t = −1.61, P = 0.11). There was no significant difference in LBW incidence between childbearing women with and without syphilis (χ2 = 1.41, P = 0.24). Women who were not syphilis-infected when recruited remained uninfected at delivery.

Table 1

Comparison of baseline characteristics between syphilis-exposed and -unexposed groups.

Characteristics		Syphilis-exposed		Syphilis-unexposed		Statistics	P
		n	%	n	%
MATERNAL	Age** (years)	333	28.23 ± 5.45	333	28.44 ± 5.36	t = −0.50	0.62
Education	Primary or less	47	14.4	11	3.4	χ2 = 125.38	<0.01
	Secondary	257	78.6	169	52.7
	College or above	23	7.0	141	43.9
Gravidity	0	56	17.3	120	37.7	χ2 = 39.09	<0.01
	1	97	30.0	93	29.3
	≥2	171	52.7	105	33.0
Parity	0	182	57.1	190	62.9	χ2 = 2.60	0.27
	1	127	39.8	106	35.1
	≥2	10	3.1	6	2.0
Marital status	Married	313	96.0	320	99.7	χ2 = 10.33	<0.01
	Unmarried	13	4.0	1	0.3
Employment	Employed	194	59.5	242	75.4	χ2 = 18.56	<0.01
	Unemployed	132	40.5	79	24.6
Family income (CNY)***		314	60000	315	80000	Z = −2.92	<0.01
INFANT	Male	185	57.5	174	53.7	χ2 = 0.92	0.34
	Birth Weight (kg)**	319	3.35 ± 0.51	324	3.35 ± 0.42	t = 0.21	0.83
	Low birth weight (<2.5 kg)	8	2.5	4	1.2	χ2 = 1.41	0.24
	Birth Length (cm)**	318	49.74 ± 1.92	324	49.95 ± 0.84	t = −1.61	0.11

*Missing data (loss to follow-up) were not analyzed. **Parameters are Mean ± SD. ***Parameters are medians.

Information on syphilis-positive women is shown in Table 2. Of the women with syphilis, 92.65% had latent syphilis, and 88.59% had a serum titer under 1:4 at delivery. Three hundred and fourteen of 333 syphilis-positive women received treatment (treatment coverage of 94.29%). At delivery and throughout the study period, no syphilis-exposed infants were diagnosed with congenital syphilis.

Table 2

Information on syphilis-positive women (n = 333).

Characteristics		Number	Percent
Syphilis stage	Latent syphilis	309	92.65%
	I	17	5.11%
	II	5	1.60%
	III	2	0.64%
	IV	0	0
Syphilis titer at diagnosis	<1:4	237	71.17%
	≥1:4	96	28.83%
Syphilis treatment	Yes	314	94.29%
	No	19	5.71%
Syphilis titer at delivery	<1:4	295	88.59%
	≥1:4	38	11.41%

Growth parameters and velocities at each time point

Mean weight, length, and head circumference (t-test, all P > 0.05) of children, as well as disease incidence (Pearson’s χ2 test, all P > 0.05) in children were similar between the two groups at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months of age (Table 3). Growth velocities based on weight, length, and head circumference in syphilis-exposed uninfected children were comparable with those in unexposed children at all subsequent time points (t-test, all P > 0.05), except for mean weight velocity between 6–9 months (t = 2.23, P = 0.03) (Table 4 and Fig. 1). The greatest changes in weight and length occurred during the first 3 months after birth.

Table 3

Comparison of anthropometric parameters, and proportion of diseases in children from the syphilis-exposed and -unexposed groups (mean ± SD, numbers, proportion).

Follow up		Syphilis-exposed	N	Syphilis-unexposed	N	Statistics	P
3 months	Weight (kg)	6.52 ± 0.73	281	6.63 ± 0.78	290	t = −1.52	0.13
	Length (cm)	61.40 ± 2.75	285	61.71 ± 2.61	292	t = −1.19	0.23
	Head circumference (cm)	40.34 ± 1.41	283	40.24 ± 1.37	291	t = 0.46	0.64
	Disease n(%)	41(14.6)	281	55(18.9)	291	χ2 = 1.90	0.17
6 months	Weight (kg)	8.03 ± 0.90	270	8.20 ± 0.99	299	t = −1.91	0.06
	Length (cm)	67.55 ± 3.35	270	67.46 ± 2.66	301	t = 0.56	0.58
	Head circumference (cm)	42.89 ± 1.86	270	43.05 ± 1.92	299	t = −0.77	0.44
	Disease n(%)	44(16.5)	267	52(17.9)	291	χ2 = 0.19	0.66
9 months	Weight (kg)	8.89 ± 1.13	295	8.94 ± 0.99	310	t = −0.63	0.53
	Length (cm)	70.85 ± 2.36	295	70.71 ± 3.69	308	t = 0.71	0.48
	Head circumference (cm)	44.32 ± 1.34	295	44.36 ± 1.29	304	t = −0.74	0.46
	Disease n(%)	38(13.1)	290	42(14.9)	282	χ2 = 0.38	0.54
12 months	Weight (kg)	9.76 ± 1.02	266	9.81 ± 1.05	273	t = 0.27	0.79
	Length (cm)	74.95 ± 6.10	267	74.89 ± 5.55	274	t = 0.35	0.72
	Head circumference (cm)	45.77 ± 1.20	262	45.83 ± 1.25	274	t = −0.21	0.83
	Disease n(%)	37(14.5)	255	34(12.8)	265	χ2 = 0.31	0.58
18 months	Weight (kg)	10.86 ± 1.09	234	10.96 ± 1.13	245	t = −0.73	0.46
	Length (cm)	81.18 ± 4.72	233	81.30 ± 5.70	245	t = 0.10	0.92
	Head circumference (cm)	46.88 ± 1.78	233	47.02 ± 1.26	245	t = −0.64	0.52
	Disease n(%)	27(12.3)	219	25(11.3)	221	χ2 = 0.11	0.74

*Mean ± SD and numbers are calculated using all available data and not only matched data.

Table 4

Comparison of growth velocities of anthropometric parameters from syphilis-exposed versus syphilis-unexposed children (mean ± SD, numbers).

Follow up		Syphilis-exposed	N	Syphilis-unexposed	N	t	P
Birth-3 months	Weight (kg/mo)	1.06 ± 0.28	276	1.09 ± 0.28	281	−1.41	0.16
	Length (cm/mo)	3.89 ± 0.76	273	3.91 ± 0.78	279	−0.14	0.89
3–6 months	Weight (kg/mo)	0.55 ± 0.28	262	0.58 ± 0.32	288	−1.27	0.21
	Length (cm/mo)	2.24 ± 1.16	263	2.18 ± 1.08	289	0.49	0.63
	Head circumference (cm/mo)	0.99 ± 1.29	249	0.95 ± 0.55	271	0.62	0.54
6–9 months	Weight (kg/mo)	0.32 ± 0.29	276	0.28 ± 0.19	289	2.23	0.03
	Length (cm/mo)	1.24 ± 0.84	283	1.18 ± 0.77	293	1.14	0.25
	Head circumference (cm/mo)	0.53 ± 0.35	275	0.53 ± 0.68	284	<0.001	0.99
9–12 months	Weight (kg/mo)	0.34 ± 0.22	253	0.33 ± 0.20	250	0.84	0.40
	Length (cm/mo)	1.64 ± 0.72	253	1.56 ± 0.67	262	1.46	0.15
	Head circumference (cm/mo)	0.54 ± 0.35	248	0.54 ± 0.34	259	0.75	0.45
12–18 months	Weight (kg/mo)	0.20 ± 0.12	212	0.22 ± 0.14	227	−0.65	0.52
	Length (cm/mo)	1.02 ± 0.31	219	1.10 ± 0.67	233	−1.50	0.13
	Head circumference (cm/mo)	0.22 ± 0.13	211	0.24 ± 0.14	221	−0.80	0.42

Figure 1

Means (95% confidence interval, CI) of weight, length, and head circumference of children, grouped by syphilis exposure condition, at birth and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after birth. Head circumference was not measured at birth.

Comparison of WHO standards with growth of children born to women with syphilis

We compared the growth of children born to syphilis-positive women with WHO reference standards, as shown in Table 5. At birth, only girls had greater birth weight and length than the WHO standards (t = 7.33, P < 0.001; t = 4.02, P = 0.0001, respectively). During follow up, boys in the current study had greater weight in the first year, increased height at 3, 6, and 9 months old, and larger head circumference at 3 and 9 months old compared with WHO standards (t test, all P < 0.05). Girls in this study had greater weight, length and head circumference at 3, 6 and 12 months, a greater weight at 9 months old, and greater weight and head circumference at 18 months old than WHO standards (t test, all P < 0.05).

Table 5

Comparison of growth between children born to syphilis-positive women and WHO references (Mean ± SD, numbers).

Follow up		Boys	N	WHO-boys	t	P	Girls	N	WHO-girls	t	P
At birth	Weight (kg)	3.33 ± 0.70	18 3	3.35 ± 0.55	−0.46	0.64	3.28 ± 0.51	136	3.23 ± 0.47	7.33	<0.001
	Length (cm)	49.50 ± 4.09	182	49.88 ± 1.89	−1.24	0.22	49.74 ± 1.00	136	49.15 ± 1.86	4.02	0.0001
3 M	Weight (kg)	6.73 ± 0.71	148	6.38 ± 0.82	6.01	<0.001	6.29 ± 0.69	128	5.85 ± 0.75	7.32	<0.001
	Length (cm)	61.90 ± 2.56	152	61.43 ± 2.04	2.25	0.03	60.82 ± 2.90	129	59.80 ± 2.11	3.99	0.0001
	Head circumference (cm)	40.75 ± 1.40	150	40.51 ± 1.18	2.06	0.04	39.86 ± 1.29	129	39.53 ± 1.24	2.93	0.004
6 M	Weight (kg)	8.25 ± 0.91	148	7.93 ± 0.87	4.25	<0.001	7.80 ± 0.82	116	7.30 ± 0.75	6.53	<0.001
	Length (cm)	68.00 ± 2.29	147	67.62 ± 2.14	2.02	0.04	66.84 ± 2.98	116	65.73 ± 2.27	4.03	<0.001
	Head circumference (cm)	43.30 ± 1.53	147	43.33 ± 1.22	−0.24	0.81	42.54 ± 1.12	116	42.20 ± 1.30	3.29	0.001
9 M	Weight (kg)	9.11 ± 0.93	171	8.90 ± 1.00	2.94	0.004	8.60 ± 1.31	121	8.23 ± 1.07	3.1	0.002
	Length (cm)	71.43 ± 2.21	171	71.97 ± 2.24	−3.22	0.002	70.07 ± 2.35	121	70.14 ± 2.42	−0.32	0.75
	Head circumference (cm)	44.65 ± 1.38	171	45.00 ± 1.26	−3.32	0.001	43.84 ± 1.08	121	43.83 ± 1.34	0.07	0.95
12 M	Weight (kg)	10.05 ± 0.98	149	9.65 ± 1.15	4.92	<0.001	9.38 ± 0.96	113	8.95 ± 1.15	4.77	<0.001
	Length (cm)	76.15 ± 2.48	146	75.75 ± 2.38	1.96	0.05	74.73 ± 2.40	114	74.02 ± 2.58	3.14	0.002
	Head circumference (cm)	46.14 ± 1.16	146	46.07 ± 1.28	0.72	0.47	45.27 ± 1.07	113	44.90 ± 1.36	3.69	0.0004
18 M	Weight (kg)	11.04 ± 1.12	127	10.94 ± 1.26	0.97	0.33	10.67 ± 1.04	99	10.23 ± 1.37	4.20	<0.001
	Length (cm)	82.17 ± 3.20	126	82.26 ± 2.70	−0.31	0.76	80.51 ± 2.82	98	80.71 ± 2.90	−0.69	0.49
	Head circumference (cm)	47.23 ± 1.28	126	47.37 ± 1.33	−1.25	0.21	46.65 ± 1.01	98	46.24 ± 1.38	4.02	0.0001

Mixed-effects models for weight and length

To compare the differences in growth pattern between syphilis-exposed and -unexposed uninfected children within 18 months after birth, and to estimate children’s growth trajectories in anthropometric measurements over time, we used the mixed-effects model, controlling for sex, maternal education, family income, and underweight at birth (Table 6). The non-significance of Group terms verified that the mean weight and length of syphilis-exposed and -unexposed uninfected infants at birth were not significantly different (t = 0.58, P = 0.56; t = 0.61, P = 0.54, respectively). Child Sex terms in the models indicated that the mean birth weight of boys was slightly higher than that of girls (t = −2.14, P = 0.03), but no difference was observed in mean length (t = −1.85, P = 0.06). The Age terms and Age2 terms revealed that the mean weight (t = 30.08, P < 0.001; t = −18.96, P < 0.001, respectively) and length (t = 21.36, P < 0.001; t = −12.03, P < 0.001, respectively) of the syphilis-unexposed uninfected infants increased with age, and the growth pattern followed a quadratic curve growth. The (Group × Age) and (Group × Age2) interaction terms indicated that, after controlling confounders, growth velocities in the 18 months after birth were not significantly different for both weight (t = 1.60, P = 0.11; t = −1.56, P = 0.12, respectively) and length (t = −0.76, P = 0.44; t = 0.64, P = 0.52, respectively) between the two groups, and the growth pattern of syphilis-exposed uninfected infants also showed quadratic curve growth. The (Sex × Age) interaction term demonstrated that boys’ mean weight growth rate was higher than that of girls’ (t = −6.55, P < 0.001); consistent with expectations of the interaction between sex and age. The significant random effects of Age terms indicated that age coefficients varied randomly across participants (t = 3.16, P < 0.001 for weight, and t = 4.16, P < 0.001 for length). Different infants had different velocities because of individual diversity, showing that random effects existed. Therefore, we used the mixed-effects model in this study. Family income and maternal education had no statistical effect on the trend of weight (t = 0.10, P = 0.92; t = 0.06, P = 0.95, respectively) or length (t = 1.60, P = 0.11; t = −1.8, P = 0.07, respectively) gain, but LBW had negative impacts on weight gain (t = −5.89, P < 0.001).

Table 6

Mixed effects models for weight and length in syphilis-exposed and -unexposed children*.

Variables	Weight (kg)**					Length (cm)***
	β	SE	95% CI	t	P	β	SE	95% CI	t	P
Fixed effects
Intercept	3.84	0.14	(3.57, 4.11)	28.16	<0.001	51.67	0.58	(50.53, 52.81)	89.11	<0.001
Group	0.03	0.05	(−0.08, 0.14)	0.58	0.56	0.15	0.25	(−0.34, 0.65)	0.61	0.54
Age (month)	0.97	0.03	(0.90, 1.03)	30.08	<0.001	3.38	0.16	(3.07, 3.69)	21.36	<0.001
Age2 (month2)	−0.03	0.002	(−0.035, −0.028)	−18.96	<0.001	−0.10	0.008	(−0.11, −0.08)	−12.03	<0.001
Group × Age	0.02	0.02	(−0.01, 0.05)	1.60	0.11	−0.06	0.08	(−0.21, 0.09)	−0.76	0.44
Group × Age2	−0.001	0.0008	(−0.003, 0.0003)	−1.56	0.12	0.002	0.004	(−0.005, 0.01)	0.64	0.52
Sex	−0.11	0.05	(−0.20, −0.009)	−2.14	0.03	−0.44	0.24	(−0.91, 0.03)	−1.85	0.06
Sex × Age	−0.10	0.02	(−0.13, −0.07)	−6.55	<0.001	−0.14	0.07	(−0.28, 0.01)	−1.83	0.07
Sex × Age2	0.005	0.0008	(0.003, 0.006)	6.08	<0.001	0.007	0.004	(−0.0007, 0.01)	1.79	0.07
Maternal education
Primary or less	0.006	0.10	(−0.19,0.20)	0.06	0.95	−0.56	0.31	(−1.17, 0.05)	−1.8	0.07
Secondary	0.02	0.06	(−0.10,0.13)	0.28	0.78	−0.13	0.19	(−0.50, 0.24)	−0.70	0.48
College or above	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Income (CNY)	0.35	3.49	(−6.5,7.19)	0.10	0.92	0.02	0.01	(−0.004, 0.04)	1.60	0.11
Underweight at birth	−1.08	0.18	(−1.44,−0.72)	−5.89	<0.001	—	—	—	—	—
Random effects
Intercept	<0.001	—		—	—	<0.001	—		—	—
Age	0.007	0.002		3.16	<0.001	0.17	0.006		4.16	<0.001
Age2	<0.001	<0.001		1.43	0.08	<0.001	—		—	—
Residual	0.43	0.01		31.46	<0.001	10.31	0.34		30.74	<0.001

*β = coefficient estimate, SE = standard error. Number of infants = 544 for weight and 539 for length. Number of measurements = 2982 for weight and 2951 for length. Group = 1 for the syphilis-exposed uninfected condition and 2 for the unexposed uninfected condition, sex = 1 for a boy and 2 for a girl.

**Adjusted for maternal education (primary or less, secondary, college or above), family income (as continuous variables), and underweight at birth.

***Adjusted for maternal education (primary or less, secondary, college or above) and family income (as continuous variables).

Discussion

The present study compared the differences in long-term growth and health between children exposed to syphilis but uninfected, and a group of children who were not exposed to syphilis. We also compared the growth of uninfected children born to syphilis-positive women with WHO reference standards. In general, the current findings indicated that syphilis exposure did not exert a significant negative influence on growth and health of children from birth to 18 months old. At birth and during the follow-up period, mean weight, length, head circumference, and disease incidence were similar between the two groups of children. Some growth indicators as weight, length and head circumstance in children born to syphilis-positive women were superior to WHO standards[22], particularly duing 3–12 months after birth. By mixed-effects model analysis, weight and length velocities were comparable between the two groups throughout the study period. Further, LBW exerted a negative influence on weight gain in both groups of children.

In our study, we found no remarkable differences in LBW incidence between childbearing women with and without syphilis. This may be indirectly due to the progress in the policy of Prevention of Mother-to-child Transmission of Syphilis, which promoted syphilis screening and treatment. In the present study, over 90% infected women received syphilis therapy. In addition, a large proportion of women with latent syphilis and lower serum titers also reduced the negative influence on pregnancy outcomes. In this study, 92.65% and 88.59% of syphilis-positive women had latent syphilis and a serum titer under 1:4, respectively. Most studies have reported that women with syphilis, particularly those untreated and with a higher titer (over 1:8), are at higher risk of LBW[6-8,24].

Currently, the literature on long-term growth of children exposed to syphilis but not infected is limited. There is research similar to ours on infants born to women with HIV or HBV. Some previous studies presented that HIV-exposed uninfected children had lower weight-for-age, length-for-age, and BMI-for-age Z-scores during infancy and through school age than HIV-unexposed children[9,25-27]. A study in the United States (US) found no differences in growth and body composition between uninfected children exposed to HIV and unexposed children under 2 years old; however, uninfected children exposed to HIV had lower birth weights and slightly accelerated growth[27]. The author explained that lifestyle factors may effect growth more than HIV and antiretroviral exposure[27]. However, HIV infection and a higher maternal viral load increases the risk of poor growth[13]. The present results are consistent with those from our previous study of children born to HBV-positive and HBV-negative women, whose growth patterns were comparable during the first 18 months of life[10]. In our previous study, the mother-to-child transmission rate of HBV was 1.0%[10]. A study in Jiangsu showed that children born to HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative women had comparable weight and height at ages of 5–7 years, and 3.3% of recruited children were HBsAg-positive and born to HBsAg-positive mothers[14]. Despite the possibility that infants can be infected with HIV, HBV, or syphilis by vertical transmission, these three diseases have different characteristics and intervention measures. Therefore, the growth patterns of HIV or HBV exposed infants only provided references for us.

In our study, both boys and girls born to syphilis-positive women had better growth in some indicators than WHO standards. A previous study also showed that in comparison with the WHO standards, Chinese breastfed infants were heavier and longer on average in the first year of age except from 0 to 3 months old[28]. The data collected by WHO were from widely different settings, and were undertaken during 1997–2003[22], possibly resulting in some differences. In addition, genetic variations, environmental differences, and social and economic development may also contribute to some different outcomes. Further, Zhejiang is a well-developed economic province in China, promoting optimal health outcomes and growth of children than average levels.

Multiple factors are associated with growth in children, such as maternal nutrition and education level, infant birth weight and disease[29-34]. From the adjusted mixed models, no significant differences in mean weight or length between syphilis-exposed and -unexposed uninfected infants at birth were found, consistent with our t-test results. The mixed-effects models also showed that, after controlling for confounders, changes in weight and length were similar in the two groups throughout the first 18 months of age. These findings indicate that maternal syphilis did not have a significant negative influence on infant growth in our study. We also found no significant associations between maternal education and growth of children. In contrast, in central Ethiopia, maternal educational status (adjusted OR: 0.01, 95% CI: 0.001–0.063) showed a negative association with stunted growth in children aged 6–59 months[33]. One study reported that children born to less educated mothers had greater weight and weight-for-length gains from 1–5 years of age than children whose mothers were highly educated, although the underlying mechanisms remained unclear[34]. According to the mixed-effects models, mean birth weight and weight gain of boys were higher than that of girls, but there were no differences in mean birth length and length gain. However, a Tibetan study using a mixed model controlling for weight and length at birth showed no sex difference in weight and length increments in the first year[29]. Nevertheless, the findings of other studies are consistent with our results. A survey performed by the WHO reported that boys were heavier, longer, and had larger head circumferences than girls at birth[35]. In southern India, one birth cohort showed that boys had higher average monthly weight and height gains than girls in the first 1000 days of life[5]. Another study indicated that carotid extra-medial thickness showed a strong association in boys, more so than in girls, that was significantly and positively related to infant weight gain within 18 months of age[36]. The sex difference in physical growth may relate to social factors, such as preferential care and nutrition that boys may receive in developing countries, and physiological factors such as testosterone production[37,38]. Lastly, the current results from mixed effects models found that LBW was negatively associated with the weight gain of infants, supporting previous findings[39-41]. In Northeast Brazil, a cohort study showed that LBW and reduced length at birth resulted in greatly reduced postnatal weight gain and a decreased body mass index and waist circumference of 8-year-old children[39]. In Filipino infants, LBW infants did not catch-up to normal growth parameters by 12 months of age[41]. Therefore, special care is required for newborns with LBW, particularly in the first year after birth.

In this study, no significant difference was seen in disease distribution between the syphilis-exposed and -unexposed uninfected infants. For the syphilis-exposed uninfected infants, clinical presentation of children varied from asymptomatic to acute disease, including severe anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, rhinitis, thrombocytopenia, skeletal damage, and neurosyphilis. To date, comparisons of disease epidemiology between syphilis-exposed and -unexposed uninfected infants has been limited. Several studies have described congenital syphilis symptoms[16,42]. A US study with a large sample size showed a 33.6% morbidity in congenital syphilis cases[16]. In our study, no exposed children were identified as having congenital syphilis.

Our current results suggest that uninfected children born to syphilis-positive women have similar growth patterns and health outcomes as those born to uninfected women from birth to 18 months of age. This may be evidence of the positive achievements of the policy of Prevention of Mother-to-child Transmission of Syphilis in our province. The policy increased awareness of syphilis prevention, and also improved the coverage of syphilis screening and treatment, as well as health care for infants born to syphilis-positive mothers. For example, in the present study, over 90% of syphilis-positive women received treatment, far higher than the earlier provincial level (80.2%) during 2013–2014[7] and close to the level recommended by the WHO (95%)[43].

One strength of the current study was the long follow-up period for the syphilis-exposed uninfected children, providing a better understanding of the long-term growth and health of the study population. We also compared the growth of syphilis-exposed uninfected children with reference standards from the WHO. In addition, the mixed-effects model was used to compare the growth patterns of children and influencing factors. This method has been widely used for the estimation of childhood growth[44-47]. Significant random effects in our present results demonstrated the adaptability of the mixed-effects model. Considering the efficiency of the mixed-effects model, it allowed the full usage of information and reduced bias from missing data. The mixed-effects model has the ability to capture heterogeneity in child growth curves and to adequately estimate an individual child’s trajectory[46]. A nonlinear mixed-effects model provides an alternative for analysis of longitudinal data, including power functions or multiplicative relationships to fit growth curves[47]. Covariates and interactions can be added to the model to comprehensively analyze their effects.

Some limitations of this study should also be considered. First, maternal and infant nutrition, and feeding practices were not considered because of insufficient data. Second, the small sample size made further subgroup analyses impossible or lack sufficient power for statistical analysis, such as comparing growth among syphilis-exposed and infected children, exposed but uninfected children, and children born to women treated and untreated. Third, because inadequate goodness-of-fit in a growth model may lead to gross over- or under-estimation of effects, further exploration is warranted of the appropriate growth models to use for the association between syphilis exposure and early childhood growth. Fourth, this study was conducted in areas with high economic development and high coverage of therapeutic interventions for gestational syphilis and frequent antenatal care. And further research into growth and health in school-aged children exposed to syphilis should be undertaken in the future. It is difficult to extrapolate current findings to resource-limited regions lacking intervention. Finally, the possible false positives associated with the misclassification produced by the combination of TRUST plus TPHA might decrease the effect of syphilis exposure on infants’ long-term growth and health.

Conclusion

There is limited literature on the long-term growth and health of syphilis-exposed uninfected children, particularly in comparison with unexposed uninfected children. Our current results suggest that uninfected children born to syphilis-positive women have similar growth patterns and health outcomes as those born to uninfected women from birth to 18 months of age. This may be evidence of the positive achievements of the policy of Prevention of Mother-to-child Transmission of Syphilis in our province. The policy increased awareness of syphilis prevention, and also improved the coverage of syphilis screening and treatment, as well as health care for infants born to syphilis-positive mothers. Low birth weight should be given priority, as this is a risk factor for the growth of all infants in this study. Our findings should provide a guide or reference to health care policy makers in other countries and regions.