Literature DB >> 30867278

Impact of patient choice for different postcesarean delivery analgesic protocols on opioid consumption: a randomized prospective clinical trial.

Brendan Carvalho1, Caitlin Dooley Sutton2, John J Kowalczyk3, Pamela Dru Flood4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Choice of postcesarean delivery analgesic protocol may improve pain experience and reduce analgesic requirements.
METHODS: Cesarean delivery patients were randomly assigned either to choose their postcesarean delivery analgesia protocol or to have no choice and receive routine care. Choices were low (50 μg intrathecal morphine), medium (identical to routine care: 150 μg intrathecal morphine), or high (300 μg intrathecal morphine with 600 mg oral gabapentin). All groups received scheduled acetaminophen and ibuprofen. The primary outcome was oxycodone requirements 0-48 hours postdelivery in those offered versus not offered a choice.
RESULTS: Of 160 women enrolled, 120 were offered a choice and 40 were not offered a choice. There was no difference in oxycodone requirements or pain associated with choice, but those who had a choice expressed more satisfaction than those who did not have a choice (mean (95% CI) difference 5% (0% to 10 %), p=0.005). In the choice group, the high dose group required more oxycodone (5 (0 to 15) mg 0-24 hours after delivery and 15 (10 to 25) mg at 24-48 hours; p=0.05 and p=0.001) versus the low and medium groups. The low dose group had less pruritus (p=0.001), while the high dose group had more vomiting (p=0.01) requiring antiemetic treatment (p=0.04).
CONCLUSION: Having a choice compared with no choice routine care did not reduce oxycodone requirements or pain scores. However, women have insight into their analgesic needs; women offered a choice and who chose the higher dose analgesic protocol required more oxycodone, and women who chose the lower dose protocol required less oxycodone. Despite providing additional analgesic (six times more intrathecal morphine plus gabapentin in high dose vs low dose protocols), we still did not equalize postcesarean oxycodone requirement differences between groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02605187. © American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  obstetrics; pain measurement; pain outcome measurement; postoperative pain

Year:  2019        PMID: 30867278     DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  5 in total

1.  Predicted Versus Non-Predicted Opioid Administration Using Preoperative Pain Sensitivity in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sun-Kyung Park; Hansol Kim; Seokha Yoo; Won Ho Kim; Young-Jin Lim; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.

Authors:  E Roofthooft; G P Joshi; N Rawal; M Van de Velde
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 12.893

3.  The Generalizability of Patients' Preferences and Concerns regarding Anesthesia Care for Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Survey.

Authors:  Aaron J Smith; Jaime Daly; David E Arnolds; Barbara M Scavone; Brendan Carvalho
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-12-02

4.  Effect of Sufentanil Combined with Gabapentin on Acute Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Intraspinal Tumor Resection: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Hongli Yue; Weihua Cui; Yirui Qin; Jiajing Wang; Chenyang Zhao; Miao Cheng; Bo Han; Ruquan Han
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 2.832

5.  Trend in neuraxial morphine use and postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery in Japan from 2005 to 2020.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yonekura; Yusuke Mazda; Shohei Noguchi; Hironaka Tsunobuchi; Motomu Shimaoka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.