Literature DB >> 30867087

The Power of Design Thinking in Medical Education.

Lori A Deitte1, Reed A Omary2.   

Abstract

A goal of medical education should be to optimize educational experiences of our learners. How can we better understand their experiences and design educational activities that inspire them to learn? Design Thinking is a powerful process that consists of five iterative phases: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test. Empathy with the user experience is at the core of Design Thinking. This helps define the right problem so that the right solutions can be developed. In this article, we share our experiences with using Design Thinking in radiology education. As educators, we are constantly learning and innovating. Design Thinking provides a powerful process and a growth mindset to help develop creative solutions as we move forward. We invite you to join us in this discovery quest for innovative solutions in medical education through the Design Thinking process.
Copyright © 2019 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Curriculum Design; Design Thinking; Graduate Medical Education; Medical Education; Radiology Education; Radiology Residency; Ultrasound Curriculum

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30867087     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  5 in total

Review 1.  Massive Distance Education: Barriers and Challenges in Shifting to a Complete Online Learning Environment.

Authors:  Ching-Yi Yeh; Chin-Chung Tsai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  Training Clinical Researchers with Design Thinking to To Develop Dementia Caregiving Research Initiatives.

Authors:  Leila Aflatoony; Kenneth Hepburn; Molly M Perkins; Drenna Waldrop; Lai Reed
Journal:  Design Health (Abingdon)       Date:  2022

3.  Development of a web tool to increase research literacy in underserved populations through public library partnerships.

Authors:  Melissa A Simon; Catherine A O'Brian; Laura Tom; Q Eileen Wafford; Shenita Mack; Samuel R Mendez; Magdalena Nava; Rabih Dahdouh; Rachelle Paul-Brutus; Kathryn H Carpenter; Barbara Kern; Kristi L Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Teaching design thinking as a tool to address complex public health challenges in public health students: a case study.

Authors:  Carolyn Ingram; Tessa Langhans; Carla Perrotta
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Human-centered design as a guide to intervention planning for non-communicable diseases: the BIGPIC study from Western Kenya.

Authors:  Claudia L Leung; Mackenzie Naert; Benjamin Andama; Rae Dong; David Edelman; Carol Horowitz; Peninah Kiptoo; Simon Manyara; Winnie Matelong; Esther Matini; Violet Naanyu; Sarah Nyariki; Sonak Pastakia; Thomas Valente; Valentin Fuster; Gerald S Bloomfield; Jemima Kamano; Rajesh Vedanthan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.