| Literature DB >> 30865648 |
Juliano Morimoto1,2,3, Alistair Senior1,4,5, Kate Ruiz1,6, Jibran A Wali1,5, Tamara Pulpitel1,5, Samantha M Solon-Biet1,5, Victoria C Cogger1,7,8, David Raubenheimer1,5, David G Le Couteur1,7,8, Stephen J Simpson1,5, Joerg Eberhard1,6.
Abstract
While there is a burgeoning interest in the effects of nutrition on systemic inflammatory diseases, how dietary macronutrient balance impacts local chronic inflammatory diseases in the mouth has been largely overlooked. Here, we used the Geometric Framework for Nutrition to test how the amounts of dietary macronutrients and their interactions, as well as carbohydrate type (starch vs sucrose vs resistant starch) influenced periodontitis-associated alveolar bone height in mice. Increasing intake of carbohydrates reduced alveolar bone height, while dietary protein had no effect. Whether carbohydrate came from sugar or starch did not influence the extent of alveolar bone height. In summary, the amount of carbohydrate in the diet modulated periodontitis-associated alveolar bone height independent of the source of carbohydrates.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30865648 PMCID: PMC6415785 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212796
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Composition of diets by net metabolizable energy (%)—14.3 kJ/gram.
| Carbohydrate composition | Protein 5% + Fat 20% + Carbohydrate 75% | Protein 10% + Fat 20% + Carbohydrate 70% | Protein 15% + Fat 20% + Carbohydrate 65% | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 35 | 50 | 65 | 80 | 20 | 35 | 50 | 65 | 80 | 20 | 35 | 50 | 65 | 80 | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| 80 | 65 | 50 | 35 | 20 | 80 | 65 | 50 | 35 | 20 | 80 | 65 | 50 | 35 | 20 | |
| 35 | 80 | ||||||||||||||
| X | X | X | X | X | X | + | X | X | + | X | X | X | X | X | |
| 65 | 20 | ||||||||||||||
Fig 1The distance between the CEA and the ABC as a measure of bone height.
The distance between the cemento-enamel junction and the most coronal part of the surrounding bone was measured at three sites of the middle molar tooth.
Means and SD (mm) for bone loss measured for different diets and sucrose/starch content included in the study.
| Diet | n | mean | SD | P/C/F (%) | Sucrose/starch (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | 0.156 | 0.05 | 5/75/20 | 20/80 | |
| 105 | 0.14 | 0.055 | 5/75/20 | 35/65 | |
| 88 | 0.153 | 0.049 | 5/75/20 | 50/50 | |
| 105 | 0.132 | 0.045 | 5/75/20 | 65/35 | |
| 47 | 0.128 | 0.046 | 5/75/20 | 80/20 | |
| 117 | 0.136 | 0.047 | 10/70/20 | 20/80 | |
| 106 | 0.145 | 0.062 | 10/70/20 | 35/65 | |
| 93 | 0.172 | 0.07 | 10/70/20 | 35/65 | |
| 84 | 0.144 | 0.051 | 10/70/20 | 50/50 | |
| 107 | 0.131 | 0.05 | 10/70/20 | 65/35 | |
| 93 | 0.125 | 0.047 | 10/70/20 | 80/20 | |
| 96 | 0.152 | 0.051 | 10/70/20 | 80/20 | |
| 12 | 0.121 | 0.03 | 15/65/20 | 20/80 | |
| 103 | 0.132 | 0.053 | 15/65/20 | 35/65 | |
| 93 | 0.123 | 0.043 | 15/65/20 | 50/50 | |
| 107 | 0.143 | 0.052 | 15/65/20 | 65/35 | |
| 6 | 0.078 | 0.031 | 15/65/20 | 80/20 |
Coefficients (Coef.) of smoothed terms from generalised additive mixed models (GAMM) of CEJ-ABC distance (negative associated with alveolar bone height) as a function of protein (P), carbohydrate (C), sucrose (Su) and starch (St) intake.
d.f. = degrees of freedom. In both models, the estimated residual and among-mouse standard deviation was 0.04. Bold—p < 0.05.
| Model | Coef. | Error d.f. | Reference d.f. | F-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1: Protein and Carbohydrate | P | 1.00 | 1 | 1.12 | 0.29 |
| C | 1.00 | 1 | 10.13 | ||
| P:C | 3.29 × 10−9 | 27 | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 2: Protein, Sucrose and Starch | P | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.07 | 0.30 |
| Su | 1.22 | 1.22 | 4.01 | ||
| St | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9.53 | ||
| P:Su | 1.28 × 10−6 | 27.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 | |
| P:St | 2.97 × 10−8 | 27.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| Su:St | 5.63 × 10−6 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
Fig 2Sucrose and starch intake increase the distance between CEJ and ABC, corresponding to reduced bone height in mice.
Surfaces showing predicted effect of macronutrient intake on CEJ-ABC distance as given by generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) with thin-plate splines. The results of two GAMMs are shown; one fitting only protein and carbohydrate (A), and another fitting protein, sucrose and starch (B through D). In (B through D), predicted effects assumes intake of the third macronutrient (i.e. that not displayed on the x and y axes) is held constant at the experimentally observed median. In all surfaces, red indicates the highest value, while blue indicates the lowest value.
Coefficients (Coef.) from linear mixed models (LMMs) of the estimated (Est.) effects of starch content (20% vs 65%) and starch type (non-resistant or resistant) on distance between CEJ and ABC in mice, and associated standard errors (SE).
d.f. = degrees of freedom. The estimated among-mouse and residual standard deviation was 0.046 and 0.014, respectively. Bold—p < 0.05.
| Coef. | Est. | SE | d.f. | t-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.126 | 0.012 | 62.76 | 10.62 | ||
| 0.019 | 0.017 | 63.80 | 1.153 | 0.253 | |
| 0.025 | 0.017 | 63.81 | 1.499 | 0.139 | |
| 0.002 | 0.024 | 64.08 | 0.076 | 0.940 |