Literature DB >> 30864534

Longitudinal Changes in Disability Rating Scale Scores: A Secondary Analysis Among Patients With Severe TBI Enrolled in the Epo Clinical Trial.

Julia S Benoit1, H Julia Hannay2, Jose-Miguel Yamal3, David J Francis2, Imoigele Aisiku4, Claudia Robertson5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Long-term neurological response to treatment after a severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a dynamic process. Failure to capture individual heterogeneity in recovery may impact findings from single endpoint sTBI randomized controlled trials (RCT). The present study re-examined the efficacy of erythropoietin (Epo) and transfusion thresholds through longitudinal modeling of sTBI recovery as measured by the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). This study complements the report of primary outcomes in the Epo sTBI RCT, which failed to detect significant effects of acute treatment at 6 months post-injury.
METHODS: We implemented mixed effects models to characterize the recovery time-course and to examine treatment efficacy as a function of time post-injury and injury severity.
RESULTS: The inter-quartile range (25th-75th percentile) of DRS scores was 20-28 at week1; 8-24 at week 4; and 3-17 at 6 months. TBI severity group was found to significantly interact with Epo randomization group on mean DRS recovery curves. No significant differences in DRS recovery were found in transfusion threshold groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the value of taking a comprehensive view of recovery from sTBI in the Epo RCT as a temporally dynamic process that is shaped by both treatment and injury severity, and highlights the importance of the timing of primary outcome measurement. Effects of Epo treatment varied as a function of injury severity and time. Future studies are warranted to understand the possible moderating influence of injury severity on treatment effects pertaining to sTBI recovery. (JINS, 2019, 25, 293-301).

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRS; Functional outcome; Injury severity; Long-term functional recovery; Longitudinal data analysis; Neurotrauma; Randomized clinical trial; Treatment profiles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30864534      PMCID: PMC6417815          DOI: 10.1017/S1355617718001078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  27 in total

1.  Use of the Disability Rating Scale Recovery curve as a predictor of psychosocial outcome following closed-head injury.

Authors:  S R McCauley; H J Hannay; P R Swank
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.892

2.  The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography.

Authors:  L F Marshall; S B Marshall; M R Klauber; M Van Berkum Clark; H Eisenberg; J A Jane; T G Luerssen; A Marmarou; M A Foulkes
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury.

Authors:  W D Gouvier; P D Blanton; K K LaPorte; C Nepomuceno
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Exploring new routes for neuroprotective drug development in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  T Janowitz; D K Menon
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 5.  Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions.

Authors:  Hester F Lingsma; Bob Roozenbeek; Ewout W Steyerberg; Gordon D Murray; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 44.182

6.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Prognosis of rehabilitation outcome in head injury using the Disability Rating Scale.

Authors:  J M Fleming; F Maas
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community.

Authors:  M Rappaport; K M Hall; K Hopkins; T Belleza; D N Cope
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Prospective randomized evaluation of therapeutic decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury with mass lesions (PRECIS): study protocol for a controlled trial.

Authors:  He-xiang Zhao; Yi Liao; Ding Xu; Qiang-ping Wang; Qi Gan; Chao You; Chao-hua Yang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Mushkudiani; Pablo Perel; Isabella Butcher; Juan Lu; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Anthony Marmarou; Ian Roberts; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Effect of Erythropoietin and Its Derivatives on Ischemic Stroke Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Ma; Zhiyuan Zhou; Guo-Yuan Yang; Jing Ding; Xin Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Disability Rating Scale in the First Few Weeks After a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury as a Predictor of 6-Month Functional Outcome.

Authors:  Jose-Miguel Yamal; Imoigele P Aisiku; H Julia Hannay; Frances A Brito; Claudia S Robertson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Traumatic axonal injury (TAI): definitions, pathophysiology and imaging-a narrative review.

Authors:  Gavin F Bruggeman; Iain K Haitsma; Clemens M F Dirven; Victor Volovici
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.216

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.