Literature DB >> 30864076

Optimizing intraoperative administration of propofol, remifentanil, and fentanyl through pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations to increase the postoperative duration of analgesia.

Carl Tams1, Noah Syroid2,3, Terrie Vasilopoulos4, Ken Johnson2.   

Abstract

Titrating an intraoperative anesthetic to achieve the postoperative goals of rapid emergence and prolonged analgesia can be difficult because of inter-patient variability and the need to provide intraoperative sedation and analgesia. Modeling pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anesthetic administrations estimates drug concentrations and predicted responses to stimuli during anesthesia. With utility of these PK/PD models we created an algorithm to optimize the intraoperative dosing regimen. We hypothesized the optimization algorithm would find a dosing regimen that would increase the postoperative duration of analgesia, not increase the time to emergence, and meet the intraoperative requirements of sedation and analgesia. To evaluate these hypotheses we performed a simulation study on previously collected anesthesia data. We developed an algorithm to recommend different intraoperative dosing regimens for improved post-operative results. To test the post-operative results of the algorithm we tested it on previously collected anesthesia data. An anesthetic dataset of 21 patients was obtained from a previous study from an anesthetic database at the University of Utah. Using the anesthetic records from these surgeries we modeled 21 patients using the same patient demographics and anesthetic requirements as the dataset. The anesthetic was simulated for each of the 21 patients with three different dosing regimens. The three dosing regimens are: from the anesthesiologist as recorded in the dataset (control group), from the algorithm in the clinical scenario one (test group), and from the algorithm in the clinical scenario two (test group). We created two clinical scenarios for the optimization algorithm to perform; one with normal general anesthesia constraints and goals, and a second condition where a delayed time to emergence is allowed to further maximize the duration of analgesia. The algorithm was evaluated by comparing the post-operative results of the control group to each of the test groups. Comparing results between the clinical scenario 1 dosing to the actual dosing showed a median increase in the duration of analgesia by 6 min and the time to emergence by 0.3 min. This was achieved by decreasing the intraoperative remifentanil infusion rate, increased the fentanyl dosing regimen, and not changing the propofol infusion rate. Comparing results between the clinical scenario 2 dosing to the actual dosing showed a median increase in the duration of analgesia by 26 min and emergence by 1.5 min. To dosing regimen from clinical scenario 2 greatly increased the fentanyl dosing regimen and greatly decreased the remifentanil infusion rate with no change to the propofol infusion rate. The results from this preliminary analysis of the optimization algorithm appear to imply that it can operate as intended. However a clinical study is warranted to determine to what extent the optimization algorithm determined optimal dosing regimens can maximize the postoperative duration of analgesia without delaying the time to emergence in a clinical setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Optimization; Pharmacodynamic; Pharmacokinetic; Total intravenous anesthesia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30864076     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00298-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  18 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing intravenous drug administration by applying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concepts.

Authors:  M M R F Struys; M Sahinovic; B J Lichtenbelt; H E M Vereecke; A R Absalom
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in anaesthesia. A review of current knowledge and how it can be used to optimize anaesthetic drug administration.

Authors:  J P van den Berg; H E M Vereecke; J H Proost; D J Eleveld; J K G Wietasch; A R Absalom; M M R F Struys
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers.

Authors:  T W Schnider; C F Minto; P L Gambus; C Andresen; D B Goodale; S L Shafer; E J Youngs
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump.

Authors:  S L Shafer; J R Varvel; N Aziz; J C Scott
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  T W Schnider; C F Minto; S L Shafer; P L Gambus; C Andresen; D B Goodale; E J Youngs
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  An exploration of remifentanil-propofol combinations that lead to a loss of response to esophageal instrumentation, a loss of responsiveness, and/or onset of intolerable ventilatory depression.

Authors:  Cris D LaPierre; Ken B Johnson; Benjamin R Randall; Julia L White; Talmage D Egan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Propofol anesthesia and rational opioid selection: determination of optimal EC50-EC95 propofol-opioid concentrations that assure adequate anesthesia and a rapid return of consciousness.

Authors:  J Vuyk; M J Mertens; E Olofsen; A G Burm; J G Bovill
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Navigator® and SmartPilot® View are helpful in guiding anesthesia and reducing anesthetic drug dosing.

Authors:  V Cirillo; G Zito Marinosci; E De Robertis; C Iacono; G M Romano; O Desantis; O Piazza; G Servillo; R Tufano
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil (GI87084B) in healthy adult male volunteers.

Authors:  T D Egan; H J Lemmens; P Fiset; D J Hermann; K T Muir; D R Stanski; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy.

Authors:  Thomas W Bouillon; Jörgen Bruhn; Lucian Radulescu; Corina Andresen; Thomas J Shafer; Carol Cohane; Steven L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  3 in total

1.  Administration of anesthetic drugs according to pharmacological principles: are we heading in the right direction?

Authors:  Hugo E M Vereecke
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  End of year summary 2019: anaesthesia and airway management.

Authors:  Jan F A Hendrickx; Tom Van Zundert; Andre M De Wolf
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparison of haemodynamic- and electroencephalographic-monitored effects evoked by four combinations of effect-site concentrations of propofol and remifentanil, yielding a predicted tolerance to laryngoscopy of 90.

Authors:  J P van den Berg; A R Absalom; A M Venema; A F Kalmar; K Van Amsterdam; L N Hannivoort; J H Proost; S Meier; T W L Scheeren; M M R F Struys; H E M Vereecke
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.502

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.