| Literature DB >> 30863553 |
Yue Wu1, Brisa N Sánchez2, Jaclyn M Goodrich3, Dana C Dolinoy1,3,4, Alejandra Cantoral5, Adriana Mercado-Garcia5, Edward A Ruiz-Narváez1, Martha M Téllez-Rojo5, Karen E Peterson1.
Abstract
Gene expression changes mediated by DNA methylation may play a role in pubertal tempo regulation, and availability of methyl donor nutrients affects these pathways. We examined first trimester maternal and adolescent diet patterns that may be associated with DNA methylation at long interspersed nucleotide (LINE-1) repetitive elements in adolescence using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and calculated an 'Epigenetics-Associated Diet Score' (EADS) for each pattern; then tested the associations of these scores with pubertal tempo among adolescent boys and girls. The analytic sample included 118 boys and 132 girls aged 10-18 years. DNA methylation at LINE-1 repetitive elements was quantified. Typical maternal and adolescent nutrient intakes were estimated using food frequency questionnaires. Interval-censored time to event and ordinal regression models were used to examine associations EADS scores with pubertal tempo using physician-assessed Tanner stages and self-reported menarche, respectively, adjusted for confounders. We observed associations between maternal EADS and pubertal onset, but not pubertal progression. Each standard deviation (SD) greater maternal EADS was associated with 52% higher odds of having later onset of menarche in both cross-sectional and prospective analysis (P = 0.031 and 0.028, respectively). In contrast, we observed associations between adolescent EADS and pubertal progression, but not pubertal onset. Among boys, for each SD higher adolescent EADS, there was 13% increase in odds of slower genital progression (P = 0.050), as well as 26 and 27% increase in odds of slower left and right testicular development, respectively (P = 0.001). Epigenetic-associated diet influences pubertal tempo in a sex- and timing-specific manner.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; epigenetics; methyl donors; pubertal onset and progression; sexual maturation
Year: 2019 PMID: 30863553 PMCID: PMC6404688 DOI: 10.1093/eep/dvz002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Epigenet ISSN: 2058-5888
Distributions of Tanner stages and other covariates among ELEMENT children at the early teen visit (Visit 1) and again at the late-teen visit (Visit 2) for children who continued follow-up, in both adolescent and maternal diet analysis samples
| Adolescent diet sample | Maternal diet sample | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | Visit 1 ( | Visit 2 ( | Visit 1 ( | Visit 2 ( | ||||
| % | % | % | % | |||||
| Pubic Hair | ||||||||
| 1 | 94 | 79.66 | 27 | 25.00 | 83 | 81.37 | 27 | 28.72 |
| 2 | 17 | 14.41 | 16 | 14.81 | 13 | 12.75 | 16 | 17.02 |
| 3 | 3 | 2.54 | 30 | 27.78 | 2 | 1.96 | 25 | 26.60 |
| 4 | 1 | 0.85 | 18 | 16.67 | 1 | 0.98 | 11 | 11.70 |
| 5 | 0 | 0.00 | 14 | 12.96 | 0 | 0.00 | 12 | 12.77 |
| Missing | 3 | 2.54 | 3 | 2.78 | 3 | 2.94 | 3 | 3.19 |
| Genital development | ||||||||
| 1 | 57 | 48.31 | 7 | 6.48 | 53 | 51.96 | 7 | 7.45 |
| 2 | 43 | 36.44 | 17 | 15.74 | 35 | 34.31 | 17 | 18.09 |
| 3 | 10 | 8.47 | 26 | 24.07 | 8 | 7.84 | 22 | 23.40 |
| 4 | 5 | 4.24 | 37 | 34.26 | 3 | 2.94 | 31 | 32.98 |
| 5 | 0 | 0.00 | 18 | 16.67 | 0 | 0.00 | 14 | 14.89 |
| Missing | 3 | 2.54 | 3 | 2.78 | 3 | 2.94 | 3 | 3.19 |
| Testicular development (L) | ||||||||
| 1–3 ml | 18 | 15.25 | 0 | 0.00 | 17 | 16.66 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 3–11 ml | 75 | 63.56 | 16 | 14.81 | 65 | 63.74 | 16 | 17.02 |
| >11 ml | 22 | 18.65 | 89 | 82.41 | 17 | 16.66 | 75 | 79.79 |
| Missing | 3 | 2.54 | 3 | 2.78 | 3 | 2.94 | 3 | 3.19 |
| Testicular development (R) | ||||||||
| 1–3 ml | 18 | 15.25 | 0 | 0.00 | 17 | 16.66 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 3–11 ml | 76 | 64.41 | 16 | 14.81 | 65 | 63.74 | 16 | 17.02 |
| >11 ml | 20 | 16.95 | 89 | 82.41 | 16 | 15.68 | 75 | 79.79 |
| Missing | 4 | 3.39 | 3 | 2.78 | 4 | 3.92 | 3 | 3.19 |
| Age | 10.35 ± 1.61 | 13.72 ± 1.75 | 10.24 ± 1.60 | 13.51 ± 1.73 | ||||
| BMI | 19.06 ± 3.14 | 20.43 ± 3.68 | 18.96 ± 3.19 | 20.33 ± 3.88 | ||||
| Household SES: quartile | ||||||||
| 1 | 24 | 24.00 | 23 | 23.47 | 21 | 23.33 | ||
| 2 | 27 | 27.00 | 26 | 26.53 | 24 | 26.67 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 24.00 | 22 | 22.45 | 22 | 24.44 | ||
| 4 | 25 | 25.00 | 27 | 27.55 | 23 | 25.56 | ||
| Girls | Visit 1 ( | Visit 2 ( | Visit 1 ( | Visit 2 ( | ||||
| % | % | % | % | |||||
| Pubic hair | ||||||||
| 1 | 98 | 74.24 | 9 | 7.90 | 92 | 78.63 | 9 | 8.74 |
| 2 | 22 | 16.67 | 39 | 34.21 | 15 | 12.82 | 38 | 36.89 |
| 3 | 9 | 6.82 | 29 | 25.44 | 8 | 6.84 | 26 | 25.24 |
| 4 | 2 | 1.52 | 21 | 18.42 | 1 | 0.85 | 17 | 16.50 |
| 5 | 1 | 0.76 | 14 | 12.28 | 1 | 0.85 | 12 | 11.65 |
| Missing | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 1.75 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.97 |
| Breast development | ||||||||
| 1 | 87 | 65.90 | 5 | 4.39 | 82 | 70.09 | 5 | 4.85 |
| 2 | 20 | 15.15 | 12 | 10.53 | 18 | 15.38 | 12 | 11.65 |
| 3 | 18 | 13.63 | 46 | 40.35 | 13 | 11.11 | 45 | 43.69 |
| 4 | 7 | 5.30 | 31 | 27.19 | 4 | 3.42 | 24 | 23.30 |
| 5 | 0 | 0.00 | 18 | 15.79 | 0 | 0.00 | 16 | 15.53 |
| Missing | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 1.75 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.97 |
| Menarche | ||||||||
| Yes | 30 | 22.73 | 90 | 78.95 | 22 | 18.80 | 79 | 76.70 |
| No | 102 | 77.27 | 23 | 20.17 | 95 | 81.20 | 23 | 22.33 |
| Missing | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.88 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.88 |
| Age | 10.30 ± 1.72 | 13.54 ± 1.75 | 10.12 ± 1.66 | 13.37 ± 1.72 | ||||
| BMI | 19.66 ± 3.95 | 21.61 ± 4.07 | 19.63 ± 3.87 | 21.80 ± 4.16 | ||||
| Household SES: quartile | ||||||||
| 1 | 25 | 24.51 | 30 | 27.78 | 23 | 24.47 | ||
| 2 | 29 | 28.43 | 28 | 25.93 | 26 | 27.66 | ||
| 3 | 24 | 23.53 | 26 | 24.07 | 24 | 25.53 | ||
| 4 | 24 | 23.53 | 24 | 22.22 | 21 | 22.34 | ||
aDistribution were listed across different Tanner Stages. Also applies for Genital Development and Breast Development.
Patterns of diets related to child’s LINE-1 methylation at Visit 1 using LASSO feature selection
| Maternal diet pattern | ||
|---|---|---|
| Food item | Estimate | Average intake (serving/day) in study sample: mean (± SD) |
| High-fat dairy | −22.46 | 1.00 ± 0.76 |
| Yogurt | −18.88 | 0.45 ± 0.44 |
| Beef | −37.73 | 0.26 ± 0.20 |
| Potato | 30.12 | 0.31 ± 0.23 |
| Refined grain | −2.41 | 2.42 ± 1.15 |
| Chicken | −9.41 | 0.35 ± 0.25 |
| Whole grain | 2.77 | 0.37 ± 0.61 |
| Adolescent diet pattern | ||
| Food Item | Estimate | average intake (g/day) in study sample: mean (± SD) |
| Tomato | 1.55 | 6.34 ± 12.12 |
| Yogurt | 0.20 | 91.04 ± 73.97 |
| Fish | −0.78 | 10.35 ± 10.57 |
| Egg | −0.33 | 30.49 ± 24.76 |
| Cruciferous vegetables | 0.55 | 5.44 ± 7.27 |
| Leafy greens | 0.05 | 42.58 ± 49.32 |
| Pork | 0.11 | 7.95 ± 11.82 |
| Other vegetables | −0.04 | 84.40 ± 68.41 |
aEstimate = β * 100.
Associations between predicted ‘maternal’ and ‘adolescent’ EADS and Visit 1 (early teen) as well as Visit 2 (late-teen) pubertal onset, accounted for MR,
Maternal diet | |||||||||
| Boys ( | Pubic hair | Genital development | Testicular volume (L) | Testicular volume (R) | |||||
| Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | ||||||
| Visit 1 | Visit 2 | Visit 1 | Visit2 | Visit 1 | Visit 2 | Visit 1 | Visit 2 | ||
| Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | ||
| 0.92 (0.30. 2.85) | 0.91 (0.63, 1.31) | 0.83 (0.54, 1.27) | 1.17 (0.88, 1.56) | 1.19 (0.82, 1.72) | 1.28 (0.86, 1.91) | 1.14 (0.81, 1.62) | 1.20 (0.84, 1.73) | ||
| Girls ( | Pubic hair | Breast development | Menarche (Y/N) | Menarche age | |||||
| Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | ||||||
| Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | ||
| 1.17 (0.47, 2.96) | 0.76 (0.50, 1.15) | 1.42 (0.81, 2.49) | 1.24 (0.84, 1.84) | 0.85 (0.68, 1.06) | |||||
| Adolescent diet | |||||||||
| Boys ( | Pubic hair | Genital development | Testicular volume (L) | Testicular volume (R) | |||||
| Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | ||||||
| Visit 1 | Visit 2 | Visit 1 | Visit2 | Visit 1 | Visit 2 | Visit 1 | Visit 2 | ||
| Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | ||
| 0.53 (0.21. 1.33) | 0.88 (0.64, 1.21) | 0.99 (0.70, 1.38) | 0.80 (0.61, 1.06) | 1.31 (0.82, 2.07) | 1.32 (0.80, 2.15) | 1.45 (0.89, 2.35) | 1.46 (0.86, 2.47) | ||
| Girls ( | Pubic hair | Breast development | Menarche (Y/N) | Menarche age | |||||
| Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | Hazard ratio (CI) | ||||||
| Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | ||
| 1.17 (0.67, 2.05) | 0.95 (0.61, 1.49) | 0.78 (0.53, 1.15) | 0.97 (0.65, 1.43) | 0.88 (0.66, 1.19) | 0.98 (0.71, 1.36) | 0.93 (0.74, 1.16) | |||
aAdjusted for age, BMI and SES status at Visit 1 (early teen).
bBolded value indicates the association is significant with a P value < 0.1.
cModel 2: β0 + β1*EADS + β2*MR + β3*Covariates.
Associations between predicted ‘maternal’ and ‘adolescent’ EADS and pubertal progression from Visit 1 (early teen) to Visit 2 (late-teen), in adjusted multivariate regression model,b,c
Maternal diet | |||||||||
| Boys ( | Pubic hair | Genital development | Testicular volume (L) | Testicular volume (R) | |||||
| Odds ratio (CI) | Odds ratio (CI) | Odds ratio (CI) | Odds ratio (CI) | ||||||
| Main effect | Score by time | Main effect | Score by time | Main effect | Score by time | Main effect | Score by time | ||
| 0.83 (0.38, 1.79) | 0.98 (0.74, 1.28) | 0.77 (0.46, 1.28) | 1.17 (0.91, 1.51) | 1.28 (0.72, 2.27) | 0.90 (0.67, 1.21) | 1.27 (0.76, 2.14) | 0.99 (0.74, 1.31) | ||
| Girls ( | Pubic hair | Breast development | Menarche (Y/N) | ||||||
| Odds ratio (CI) | Odds ratio (CI) | Odds ratio (CI) | |||||||
| Main effect | Score by time | Main effect | Score by time | Main effect | Score by time | ||||
| 0.64 (0.32, 1.26) | 0.86 (0.67, 1.10) | 1.08 (0.68, 1.71) | 0.92 (0.77, 1.10) | 1.19 (0.87, 1.62) | |||||
| Adolescent diet | |||||||||
| Boys ( | Pubic Hair | Genital Development | Testicular Volume (L) | Testicular Volume (R) | |||||
| Odds ratio (CI) | Odds ratio (CI) | Odds ratio (CI) | Odds ratio (CI) | ||||||
| Main Effect | Score by Time | Main Effect | Score by Time | Main Effect | Score by Time | Main Effect | Score by Time | ||
| 0.89 (0.57, 1.39) | 0.93 (0.79, 1.10) | 1.03 (0.77, 1.38) | |||||||
| Girls ( | Pubic Hair | Breast Development | Menarche (Y/N) | ||||||
| Odds ratio (CI) | Odds ratio (CI) | Odds ratio (CI) | |||||||
| Main effect | Score by Time | Main effect | Score by Time | Main effect | Score by Time | ||||
| 1.28 (0.88, 1.85) | 0.97 (0.62, 1.51) | 0.98 (0.83, 1.14) | 1.10 (0.55, 2.17) | 0.88 (0.69, 1.12) | |||||
Odds ratios are shown from adjusted models for the main effect of methylation donor score along with the interaction between the score and time interval between visits.
aAdjusted for age, BMI and SES status at Visit 1 (early teen).
bBolded value indicates the association is significant with a P value < 0.1.
cModel: logit (Y) =: logit (Y) = β0 + β1* Age + β2*Time + β3* EADS + β4*EADS*Time + β5*MR + β6*MR*Time + β7*Age*Time + β8*covariates.
Figure 1:Timeline and selection of ELEMENT subjects for the study