| Literature DB >> 30862289 |
Camilla Sguotti1, Saskia A Otto1, Romain Frelat1, Tom J Langbehn2, Marie Plambech Ryberg3, Martin Lindegren3, Joël M Durant4, Nils Chr Stenseth4, Christian Möllmann1.
Abstract
Collapses and regime changes are pervasive in complex systems (such as marine ecosystems) governed by multiple stressors. The demise of Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua) stocks constitutes a text book example of the consequences of overexploiting marine living resources, yet the drivers of these nearly synchronous collapses are still debated. Moreover, it is still unclear why rebuilding of collapsed fish stocks such as cod is often slow or absent. Here, we apply the stochastic cusp model, based on catastrophe theory, and show that collapse and recovery of cod stocks are potentially driven by the specific interaction between exploitation pressure and environmental drivers. Our statistical modelling study demonstrates that for most of the cod stocks, ocean warming could induce a nonlinear discontinuous relationship between fishing pressure and stock size, which would explain hysteresis in their response to reduced exploitation pressure. Our study suggests further that a continuing increase in ocean temperatures will probably limit productivity and hence future fishing opportunities for most cod stocks of the Atlantic Ocean. Moreover, our study contributes to the ongoing discussion on the importance of climate and fishing effects on commercially exploited fish stocks, highlighting the importance of considering discontinuous dynamics in holistic ecosystem-based management approaches, particularly under climate change.Entities:
Keywords: Atlantic cod; catastrophe theory; population recovery; stochastic cusp modelling; stock collapse
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30862289 PMCID: PMC6458326 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349
Figure 1.Spawner biomass (SB) trends and change points. Scaled SB (between 0 and 1, SB−min(SB)/max(SB)−min(SB)) time series of Atlantic cod stocks. Blue smoother lines indicate time trends and were fitted using generalized additive modelling (no smoother was fitted to stocks that mainly oscillate, in order to differentiate the two different stocks dynamics). Dotted vertical lines represent the major change points in the time series (red lines indicated negative, light-blue lines positive change points) derived by Bayesian change point and trend analysis (explained in the electronic supplementary material). Stock names and numbers according to the electronic supplementary material, table S1. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.The stochastic cusp model—from three-dimensional to two-dimensional representation. (a) The typical three-dimensional representation of the cusp model where North Atlantic cod SB dynamics depend on two controlling variables α (fishing mortality—FM) set by fisheries management and β (sea surface temperature—SST) controlling whether SB follows a continuous or discontinuous path. (b,c) Two-dimensional projection of the plane. The bifurcation area under the folded three-dimensional phase plane is shaded in grey and light blue (representing where the data of this stock can be found in the plane). Filled dots in (b) and (c) represent SB with the radius scaling relative to stock size. The red dots are highlighted in order to show the last ca 10 years of the time series. (c) The vertical dotted line represents the present management target, in this case FMSY, which can be found in the electronic supplementary material, table S3. Note that the y-axis is reversed with temperature increasing downwards.
. Results of the valid stochastic cusp models. (Results of valid (see the electronic supplementary material, table S4) cusp models for Atlantic cod stocks (stock numbers according to the electronic supplementary material, table S1 are indicated in parentheses). Reported are estimated model parameters (with standard errors) α0/α1 (for fishing mortality—FM), β0,/β1 (for sea surface temperature—SST; except for Baltic E where the extent of anoxic area were used as a predictor) and for w0,/w1 (SB, as the state variable). Asterisks indicate the significance level of the estimated parameters (*p < 0.05, **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005). Furthermore, the R2 (Cobb's pseudo-R2) indicates the quality of the cusp model fit and the AICc is given for comparison of the cusp and the alternative linear and logistic models.)
| stock | AICc (cusp) | AICc (linear) | AICc (logistic) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltic E (1) | 0.12 (0.47) | −0.83 (0.58) | 0.77 (0.91) | 3.76 × 10−2(1.83 × 10−2)* | −2.6 (0.16)*** | 6.75 × 10−6 (5.1 × 10−7)*** | 0.77 | 107 | 1271 | 1252 |
| Baltic W (2) | 0.19 (1.22) | −0.17 (1.10) | 4.59 (3.49) | −0.37 (0.366) | −2.50 (0.37)** | 8.41 × 10−5 (1 × 10−5)*** | 0.69 | 137 | 1016 | 1015 |
| Kattegat (3) | 0.83 (0.59) | −1.38 (−0.62)* | −13.40 (4.39)** | 1.53 (0.43)*** | −2.41 (0.16)*** | 1.28 × 10−4 (1.04 × 10−5)*** | 0.75 | 93 | 923 | 921 |
| north (4) | 0.65 (0.47) | −1.81 (0.76)* | −18.78 (5)*** | 1.95 (0.46)*** | −3.06 (0.22)*** | 1.65 × 10−5 (1.69 × 10−6)*** | 0.38 | 124 | 1335 | 1327 |
| Scotland (5) | 1.77 (1.90) | −3.04 (2.31) | −54.01 (10.6)*** | 5.26 (1)*** | −2.54 (0.18)*** | 9.27 × 10−5 (1.07 × 10−5)*** | 0.64 | 67 | 751 | 745 |
| Irish (6) | −0.08 (0.32) | −0.46 (0.35) | −42.79 (9.6)*** | 3.94 (0.83)*** | −2.4 (0.16)*** | 1.993 × 10−4 (2.1 × 10−5)*** | 0.59 | 108 | 975 | 971 |
| coastal (8) | −0.68 (0.43) | −0.71 (1.24) | −10.97 (3.5)*** | 4.49 (1.16)*** | −2.57 (0.178)*** | 2.07 × 10−5 (1.82 × 106)*** | 0.77 | 59 | 810 | 797 |
| Arctic (9) | 2.42 (0.75)** | −9.86 (2.67)*** | 20.88 (3.70)*** | −5.51 (0.15)*** | −3.17 (1.1 × 10−7)*** | 1.731 × 10−6 (1.1) | 0.78 | 53 | 1978 | NA |
| Iceland (11) | 4.65 (1.17)*** | −14.91 (3.75)*** | 3.96 (4.17) | −0.35 (0.15)* | −3.17 (3.5 × 10−7)*** | 5.465 × 10−6 (0.596) | 0.77 | 70 | 1649 | 1637 |
| northern (12) | −1.60 (0.63)* | 9.03 (3.48)** | 4.019 (3.05) | 0.03 (0.15) | −2.48 (0.55)*** | 5.21 × 10−6 (3.09 × 10−7)*** | 0.94 | 20 | 922 | 899 |
| Lawrence N (13) | −0.34 (0.17) | 0.07 (0.30) | −4.38 (2.32) | 1.43 (0.43)** | −2.53 (0.14)*** | 2.41 × 10−5 (1.47 × 10−6)*** | 0.85 | 72 | 1024 | 1021 |
| Lawrence S (14) | −0.66 (0.22)** | 1.55 (0.97) | −14.72 (3.33)*** | 2.53 (0.51)*** | −3.01 (0.20)*** | 1.35 × 10−5 (1.04 × 10−6)*** | 0.65 | 92 | 1128 | 1106 |
| Scotian E (15) | −0.49 (0.19)** | 0.69 (0.37) | −22.28 (9.98)* | 1.63 (0.66)* | −2.14 (0.16)*** | 2.67 × 10−5 (2.095 × 10−6)*** | 0.80 | 96 | 1003 | 974 |
| Grand (16) | −0.88 (0.28)** | 1.43 (0.52)** | −5.4 (5.39) | 0.61 (0.47) | −1.88 (0.15)*** | 3.46 × 10−5 (2.95 × 10−6)*** | 0.62 | 138 | 1316 | 1302 |
| Flemish (17) | −0.52 (0.23)* | 0.59 (0.48) | −31.38 (7.35)* | 2.19 (0.50)* | −2.13 (0.17)*** | 1.12 × 10−4 (1.07 × 10−5)*** | 0.69 | 108 | 912 | 923 |
| Georges (18) | 2.01 (0.81)* | −3.46 (1.25)** | −15.12 (8.74) | 1.23 (0.62)* | −2.32 (0.17)** | 4.42 × 10−5 (3.58 × 10−6)*** | 0.76 | 75 | 837 | 830 |
Figure 3.Two-dimensional bifurcation plots of the stochastic cusp model. Map indicating 19 North Atlantic cod stocks (number according to the electronic supplementary material, table S1) and their recovery status. Panels show cusp model results for nine stocks ((a), West of Scotland; (b), North Sea; (c), Irish Sea; (d), Georges Bank; (e), northern Lawrence; (f), northern cod; (g), Flemish Cap; (h), Iceland; (i), north east Arctic); other stocks, see Extended Data. Dots represent SB scaled to stock size; years greater than 2004 in red. The bifurcation area is shaded in blue and vertical dashed lines indicate stock specific management reference points of fishing mortality (FM) (electronic supplementary material, table S3). Note that the y-axis is reversed with temperature increasing downwards. (Online version in colour.)