Literature DB >> 30860285

MANTIS: Model-Augmented Neural neTwork with Incoherent k-space Sampling for efficient MR parameter mapping.

Fang Liu1, Li Feng2, Richard Kijowski1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a novel deep learning-based image reconstruction approach called MANTIS (Model-Augmented Neural neTwork with Incoherent k-space Sampling) for efficient MR parameter mapping.
METHODS: MANTIS combines end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) mapping, incoherent k-space undersampling, and a physical model as a synergistic framework. The CNN mapping directly converts a series of undersampled images straight into MR parameter maps using supervised training. Signal model fidelity is enforced by adding a pathway between the undersampled k-space and estimated parameter maps to ensure that the parameter maps produced synthesized k-space consistent with the acquired undersampling measurements. The MANTIS framework was evaluated on the T2 mapping of the knee at different acceleration rates and was compared with 2 other CNN mapping methods and conventional sparsity-based iterative reconstruction approaches. Global quantitative assessment and regional T2 analysis for the cartilage and meniscus were performed to demonstrate the reconstruction performance of MANTIS.
RESULTS: MANTIS achieved high-quality T2 mapping at both moderate (R = 5) and high (R = 8) acceleration rates. Compared to conventional reconstruction approaches that exploited image sparsity, MANTIS yielded lower errors (normalized root mean square error of 6.1% for R = 5 and 7.1% for R = 8) and higher similarity (structural similarity index of 86.2% at R = 5 and 82.1% at R = 8) to the reference in the T2 estimation. MANTIS also achieved superior performance compared to direct CNN mapping and a 2-step CNN method.
CONCLUSION: The MANTIS framework, with a combination of end-to-end CNN mapping, signal model-augmented data consistency, and incoherent k-space sampling, is a promising approach for efficient and robust estimation of quantitative MR parameters.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR parameter mapping; convolutional neural network; deep learning; image reconstruction; incoherence k-space sampling; model augmentation; model-based reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30860285      PMCID: PMC7144418          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  46 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Fast MR parameter mapping using k-t principal component analysis.

Authors:  Frederike H Petzschner; Irene P Ponce; Martin Blaimer; Peter M Jakob; Felix A Breuer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays.

Authors:  D K Sodickson; W J Manning
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Model-based T1 mapping with sparsity constraints using single-shot inversion-recovery radial FLASH.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Wang; Volkert Roeloffs; Jakob Klosowski; Zhengguo Tan; Dirk Voit; Martin Uecker; Jens Frahm
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-06-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Compressed Sensing MRI Reconstruction Using a Generative Adversarial Network With a Cyclic Loss.

Authors:  Tran Minh Quan; Thanh Nguyen-Duc; Won-Ki Jeong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jo Schlemper; Jose Caballero; Joseph V Hajnal; Anthony N Price; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning.

Authors:  Bo Zhu; Jeremiah Z Liu; Stephen F Cauley; Bruce R Rosen; Matthew S Rosen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  KIKI-net: cross-domain convolutional neural networks for reconstructing undersampled magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Taejoon Eo; Yohan Jun; Taeseong Kim; Jinseong Jang; Ho-Joon Lee; Dosik Hwang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Reconstruction of undersampled radial free-breathing 3D abdominal MRI using stacked convolutional auto-encoders.

Authors:  Jun Lv; Kun Chen; Ming Yang; Jue Zhang; Xiaoying Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Deep learning enables reduced gadolinium dose for contrast-enhanced brain MRI.

Authors:  Enhao Gong; John M Pauly; Max Wintermark; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  19 in total

1.  A multi-scale residual network for accelerated radial MR parameter mapping.

Authors:  Zhiyang Fu; Sagar Mandava; Mahesh B Keerthivasan; Zhitao Li; Kevin Johnson; Diego R Martin; Maria I Altbach; Ali Bilgin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Deep Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction: Inverse Problems Meet Neural Networks.

Authors:  Dong Liang; Jing Cheng; Ziwen Ke; Leslie Ying
Journal:  IEEE Signal Process Mag       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 12.551

3.  SANTIS: Sampling-Augmented Neural neTwork with Incoherent Structure for MR image reconstruction.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Alexey Samsonov; Lihua Chen; Richard Kijowski; Li Feng
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Studying osteoarthritis with artificial intelligence applied to magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Francesco Calivà; Nikan K Namiri; Maureen Dubreuil; Valentina Pedoia; Eugene Ozhinsky; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 5.  Cardiac MR: From Theory to Practice.

Authors:  Tevfik F Ismail; Wendy Strugnell; Chiara Coletti; Maša Božić-Iven; Sebastian Weingärtner; Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Correia; Thomas Küstner
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-03

6.  Optimization of spin-lock times in T mapping of knee cartilage: Cramér-Rao bounds versus matched sampling-fitting.

Authors:  Marcelo V W Zibetti; Azadeh Sharafi; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  The future of MRI in radiation therapy: Challenges and opportunities for the MR community.

Authors:  Rosie J Goodburn; Marielle E P Philippens; Thierry L Lefebvre; Aly Khalifa; Tom Bruijnen; Joshua N Freedman; David E J Waddington; Eyesha Younus; Eric Aliotta; Gabriele Meliadò; Teo Stanescu; Wajiha Bano; Ali Fatemi-Ardekani; Andreas Wetscherek; Uwe Oelfke; Nico van den Berg; Ralph P Mason; Petra J van Houdt; James M Balter; Oliver J Gurney-Champion
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.737

Review 8.  Deep Learning for Lesion Detection, Progression, and Prediction of Musculoskeletal Disease.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Fang Liu; Francesco Caliva; Valentina Pedoia
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Physics-based reconstruction methods for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Wang; Zhengguo Tan; Nick Scholand; Volkert Roeloffs; Martin Uecker
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Rapid Knee MRI Acquisition and Analysis Techniques for Imaging Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Akshay S Chaudhari; Feliks Kogan; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.