Literature DB >> 26116161

Assessment of liver fibrosis with 2-D shear wave elastography in comparison to transient elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in patients with chronic liver disease.

Ludmila Gerber1, Daniela Kasper2, Daniel Fitting2, Viola Knop2, Annika Vermehren2, Kathrin Sprinzl2, Martin L Hansmann3, Eva Herrmann4, Joerg Bojunga2, Joerg Albert2, Christoph Sarrazin2, Stefan Zeuzem2, Mireen Friedrich-Rust2.   

Abstract

Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2-D SWE) is an ultrasound-based elastography method integrated into a conventional ultrasound machine. It can evaluate larger regions of interest and, therefore, might be better at determining the overall fibrosis distribution. The aim of this prospective study was to compare 2-D SWE with the two best evaluated liver elastography methods, transient elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse (point SWE using acoustic radiation force impulse) imaging, in the same population group. The study included 132 patients with chronic hepatopathies, in which liver stiffness was evaluated using transient elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and 2-D SWE. The reference methods were liver biopsy for the assessment of liver fibrosis (n = 101) and magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (n = 31). No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy, assessed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), was found between the three elastography methods (2-D SWE, transient elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse imaging) for the diagnosis of significant and advanced fibrosis and liver cirrhosis in the "per protocol" (AUROCs for fibrosis stages ≥2: 0.90, 0.95 and 0.91; for fibrosis stage [F] ≥3: 0.93, 0.95 and 0.94; for F = 4: 0.92, 0.96 and 0.92) and "intention to diagnose" cohort (AUROCs for F ≥2: 0.87, 0.92 and 0.91; for F ≥3: 0.91, 0.93 and 0.94; for F = 4: 0.88, 0.90 and 0.89). Therefore, 2-D SWE, ARFI imaging and transient elastography seem to be comparably good methods for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis.
Copyright © 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2-D shear wave imaging; Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging; Elastography; Fibroscan; Liver biopsy; Liver fibrosis; Transient elastography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26116161     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  30 in total

Review 1.  Critical comparison of elastography methods to assess chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Thierry Poynard; Laurent Castera
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Hepatobiliary Quiz Answers-19 (2016).

Authors:  Sahaj Rathi; Radha K Dhiman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2016-10-03

3.  Analysis of three ultrasound elastography techniques for grading liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Xinping Ren; Shujun Xia; Zhongxin Ni; Weiwei Zhan; Jianqiao Zhou
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  2D Shear Wave Elastography of Liver in Patients with Primary Extrahepatic Portal Vein Obstruction.

Authors:  Kumble S Madhusudhan; Raju Sharma; Ragini Kilambi; Sudhin Shylendran; Peush Sahni; Arun K Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2016-12-29

Review 5.  Evaluation of hepatic fibrosis: a review from the society of abdominal radiology disease focus panel.

Authors:  Jeanne M Horowitz; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman; Kartik Jhaveri; Patrick Kamath; Michael A Ohliger; Anthony E Samir; Alvin C Silva; Bachir Taouli; Michael S Torbenson; Michael L Wells; Benjamin Yeh; Frank H Miller
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-08

Review 6.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Measurement of Liver Stiffness with 2D-Shear Wave Elastography (2D-SWE) in Bariatric Surgery Candidates Reveals Acceptable Diagnostic Yield Compared to Liver Biopsy.

Authors:  Tannaz Jamialahmadi; Mohsen Nematy; Ali Jangjoo; Ladan Goshayeshi; Reza Rezvani; Kamran Ghaffarzadegan; Mehdi Jabbari Nooghabi; Payman Shalchian; Mahtab Zangui; Zeinab Javid; Saeid Doaei; Farnood Rajabzadeh
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Liver Stiffness Assessed by Shear Wave Elastography Predicts Postoperative Liver Failure in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yinghao Shen; Chenhao Zhou; Guodong Zhu; Guoming Shi; Xiaodong Zhu; Cheng Huang; Jian Zhou; Jia Fan; Hong Ding; Ning Ren; Hui-Chuan Sun
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Liver Stiffness Measured by Two-Dimensional Shear-Wave Elastography: Prognostic Value after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee; Jeong Min Lee; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Yoon Jun Kim; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Su Jong Yu; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 10.  Liver fibrosis imaging: A clinical review of ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Yingzhen N Zhang; Kathryn J Fowler; Arinc Ozturk; Chetan K Potu; Ashley L Louie; Vivian Montes; Walter C Henderson; Kang Wang; Michael P Andre; Anthony E Samir; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.