Literature DB >> 30858313

Polyandrous bee provides extended offspring care biparentally as an alternative to monandry based eusociality.

Michael Mikát1, Lukáš Janošík2, Kateřina Černá3, Eva Matoušková3, Jiří Hadrava3,4, Vít Bureš3, Jakub Straka3.   

Abstract

Parental care behavior evolves to increase the survival of offspring. When offspring care becomes complicated for ecological reasons, cooperation of multiple individuals can be beneficial. There are two types of cooperative care: biparental care and worker (helper)-based care (e.g., eusociality). Although biparental care is common in several groups of vertebrates, it is generally rare in arthropods. Conversely, eusociality is widespread in insects, especially the aculeate Hymenoptera. Here, we present a case of biparental care in bees, in Ceratina nigrolabiata (Apidae, Xylocopinae). Similar to eusocial behavior, biparental care leads to greater brood protection in this species. Male guarding increases provisioning of nests because females are liberated from the tradeoff between provisioning and nest protection. The main benefit of parental care for males should be increased paternity. Interestingly though, we found that paternity of offspring by guard males is extraordinarily low (10% of offspring). Generally, we found that nests were not guarded by the same male for the whole provisioning season, meaning that males arrive to nests as stepfathers. However, we show that long-term guarding performed by a single male does increase paternity. We suggest that the multiple-mating strategy of these bees increased the amount of time for interactions between the sexes, and this longer period of potential interaction supported the origin of biparental care. Eusociality based on monandry was thought to be the main type of extended brood protection in bees. We show that biparental care based on polyandry provides an interesting evolutionary alternative.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bees; biparental care; mating frequency; paternity; social behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30858313      PMCID: PMC6442561          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810092116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

Review 1.  Major Hurdles for the Evolution of Sociality.

Authors:  Judith Korb; Jürgen Heinze
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds.

Authors:  Andrew Cockburn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment.

Authors:  Steven T Kalinowski; Mark L Taper; Tristan C Marshall
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  The evolution of social monogamy in mammals.

Authors:  D Lukas; T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Understanding promiscuity: when is seeking additional mates better than guarding an already found one?

Authors:  Anna M F Harts; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Mating opportunity and the evolution of sex-specific mortality rates in a butterfly.

Authors:  K Gotthard; Sören Nylin; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Parental Care: When the Sex Has to Stop.

Authors:  Nick J Royle
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.

Authors:  S T Emlen; L W Oring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Coevolution of parental investment and sexually selected traits drives sex-role divergence.

Authors:  Lutz Fromhage; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Major benefits of guarding behavior in subsocial bees: implications for social evolution.

Authors:  Michael Mikát; Kateřina Černá; Jakub Straka
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  5 in total

1.  Nest guarding by male bees.

Authors:  Zachary M Portman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reply to Portman: Mate guarding, sib guarding, and biparental care in bees.

Authors:  Michael Mikát; Jakub Straka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coevolution of female fidelity and male help in populations with alternative reproductive tactics.

Authors:  Xiang-Yi Li; Andrew Morozov; Wolfgang Goymann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Nesting of Ceratina nigrolabiata, a biparental bee.

Authors:  Michael Mikát; Eva Matoušková; Jakub Straka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Individual-level specialisation and interspecific resource partitioning in bees revealed by pollen DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Jan Klečka; Michael Mikát; Pavla Koloušková; Jiří Hadrava; Jakub Straka
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.061

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.