Literature DB >> 33499789

Coevolution of female fidelity and male help in populations with alternative reproductive tactics.

Xiang-Yi Li1, Andrew Morozov2,3, Wolfgang Goymann4.   

Abstract

In socially monogamous species, pair-bonded males often continue to provide care to all offspring in their nests despite some degree of paternity loss due to female extra-pair copulation. Previous theoretical models suggested that females can use their within-pair offspring as 'hostages' to blackmail their social mates, so that they continue to provide care to the brood at low levels of cuckoldry. These models, however, rely on the assumption of sufficiently accurate male detection of cuckoldry and the reduction of parental effort in case of suspicion. Therefore, they cannot explain the abundant cases where cuckolded males continue to provide extensive care to the brood. Here we use an analytical population genetics model and an individual-based simulation model to explore the coevolution of female fidelity and male help in populations with two genetically determined alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs): sneakers that achieve paternity solely via extra-pair copulations and bourgeois that form a mating pair and spend some efforts in brood care. We show that when the efficiency of mate guarding is intermediate, the bourgeois males can evolve to 'specialize' in providing care by spending more than 90% of time in helping their females while guarding them as much as possible, despite frequent cuckoldry by the sneakers. We also show that when sneakers have tactic-specific adaptations and thus are more competitive than the bourgeois in gaining extra-pair fertilizations, the frequency of sneakers and the degrees of female fidelity and male help can fluctuate in evolutionary cycles. Our theoretical predictions highlight the need for further empirical tests in species with ARTs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alternative reproductive tactics; evolutionary game theory; extra-pair paternity; mate guarding; sexual conflict; tragedy of the commons

Year:  2021        PMID: 33499789      PMCID: PMC7893278          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  31 in total

1.  Stability with Inheritance in the Conditional Strategy.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1998-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Genetic evidence for monogamy in the dwarf seahorse, Hippocampus zosterae.

Authors:  Emily Rose; Clayton M Small; Hector A Saucedo; Cristin Harper; Adam G Jones
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 3.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.

Authors:  S T Emlen; L W Oring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Why do some animals mate with one partner rather than many? A review of causes and consequences of monogamy.

Authors:  Charlotta Kvarnemo
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2018-04-23

5.  Are there indirect fitness benefits of female extra-pair reproduction? Lifetime reproductive success of within-pair and extra-pair offspring.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sardell; Peter Arcese; Lukas F Keller; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Mate choice and genetic monogamy in a biparental, colonial fish.

Authors:  Franziska C Schaedelin; Wouter F D van Dongen; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Sneaker "jack" males outcompete dominant "hooknose" males under sperm competition in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).

Authors:  Brent Young; David V Conti; Matthew D Dean
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Female dispersion and sex ratios interact in the evolution of mating behavior: a computational model.

Authors:  B V Gomes; D M Guimarães; D Szczupak; K Neves
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Brood-tending males in a biparental fish suffer high paternity losses but rarely cuckold.

Authors:  Aneesh P H Bose; Holger Zimmermann; Jonathan M Henshaw; Karoline Fritzsche; Kristina M Sefc
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Relative costs and benefits of alternative reproductive phenotypes at different temperatures - genotype-by-environment interactions in a sexually selected trait.

Authors:  Agata Plesnar-Bielak; Anna Maria Skwierzyńska; Kasper Hlebowicz; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.