Literature DB >> 30857952

To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Kevin B Fricka1, Craig J McAsey1, Supatra Sritulanondha1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal mode of fixation in total knee arthroplasty is a continuing subject of debate.
METHODS: Previously, we reported 2-year results for this prospective, randomized trial. Knee Society Scores, Oxford scores, and pain visual analog scales were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively. Minimum 5-year follow-up has been obtained with radiographic analysis for 85 patients.
RESULTS: Mean Knee Society Scores and Oxford scores and patient-reported outcomes were similar in both groups. Each group had 1 additional revision, but neither was related to implant fixation. Survivorship with revision as an endpoint was equivalent (95.9% and 95.3%, P = .98). There was no significant difference in radiolucencies observed between groups (P = .10), all were non-progressive.
CONCLUSION: Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty had equivalent patient-reported outcomes and survivorship at midterm follow-up. Updates are planned at 10 and 15-year intervals to observe long-term modes of failure between these 2 methods of fixation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cemented TKA; cementless TKA; high flexion; total knee arthroplasty; trabecular metal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30857952     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Preliminary clinical results of coated porous tibia cones in septic and aseptic revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Malte Ohlmeier; Christian Lausmann; Matthias Wolff; Hussein Abdelaziz; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Five-year results after total knee arthroplasty in lymphoedema and lipoedema: encouraging functional and clinical outcomes and low rates of infection.

Authors:  Luke Granger; Scott M Bolam; Avtar Sur; Philip Mitchell; Jonathan Hutt; Nemandra A Sandiford
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 3.  A comprehensive comparison between cementless and cemented fixation in the total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Yi Zeng; Yuangang Wu; Mingyang Li; Huiqi Xie; Bin Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Total Knee Replacement with an Uncemented Porous Tantalum Tibia Component: A Failure Analysis.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Nenad Gubeljak; Esther Punzón-Quijorna; Primož Pelicon; Mitja Kelemen; Primož Vavpetič; Jožef Predan; Luka Ferlič; Igor Novak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Cemented versus uncemented total knee arthroplasty in younger patients: A protocol of retrospective cohort trial.

Authors:  Yuning Guo; Shufang Ma; Junbo Wang; Qin Zhang; Shaowei Wang; Zhipo Du
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.