Literature DB >> 30857412

Predicting Future Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease Using Electronic Health Record Data.

Elsie Gyang Ross1,2, Kenneth Jung2, Joel T Dudley3, Li Li3,4, Nicholas J Leeper1, Nigam H Shah2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. There are no readily available risk scores that can accurately identify which patients are most likely to sustain an event, making it difficult to identify those who might benefit from more aggressive intervention. Thus, we aimed to develop a novel predictive model-using machine learning methods on electronic health record data-to identify which PAD patients are most likely to develop major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data were derived from patients diagnosed with PAD at 2 tertiary care institutions. Predictive models were built using a common data model that allowed for utilization of both structured (coded) and unstructured (text) data. Only data from time of entry into the health system up to PAD diagnosis were used for modeling. Models were developed and tested using nested cross-validation. A total of 7686 patients were included in learning our predictive models. Utilizing almost 1000 variables, our best predictive model accurately determined which PAD patients would go on to develop major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events with an area under the curve of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.80-0.83).
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning algorithms applied to data in the electronic health record can learn models that accurately identify PAD patients at risk of future major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, highlighting the great potential of electronic health records to provide automated risk stratification for cardiovascular diseases. Common data models that can enable cross-institution research and technology development could potentially be an important aspect of widespread adoption of newer risk-stratification models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic health records; machine learning; mortality; peripheral arterial disease; risk

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30857412      PMCID: PMC6415677          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  48 in total

Review 1.  The Framingham Risk Score: an appraisal of its benefits and limitations.

Authors:  Brian A Hemann; William F Bimson; Allen J Taylor
Journal:  Am Heart Hosp J       Date:  2007

2.  Mining the ultimate phenome repository.

Authors:  Nigam H Shah
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Machine Learning and Prediction in Medicine - Beyond the Peak of Inflated Expectations.

Authors:  Jonathan H Chen; Steven M Asch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  The performance of risk prediction models.

Authors:  Thomas A Gerds; Tianxi Cai; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.

Authors:  W A Knaus; D P Wagner; E A Draper; J E Zimmerman; M Bergner; P G Bastos; C A Sirio; D J Murphy; T Lotring; A Damiano
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  High prevalence of undiagnosed patients with peripheral arterial disease in patients hospitalised for non-vascular disorders.

Authors:  P Lacroix; V Aboyans; D Voronin; A Le Guyader; M Cautrès; M Laskar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for Observational Researchers.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; Jon D Duke; Nigam H Shah; Christian G Reich; Vojtech Huser; Martijn J Schuemie; Marc A Suchard; Rae Woong Park; Ian Chi Kei Wong; Peter R Rijnbeek; Johan van der Lei; Nicole Pratt; G Niklas Norén; Yu-Chuan Li; Paul E Stang; David Madigan; Patrick B Ryan
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2015

8.  Creating a Common Data Model for Comparative Effectiveness with the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership.

Authors:  F FitzHenry; F S Resnic; S L Robbins; J Denton; L Nookala; D Meeker; L Ohno-Machado; M E Matheny
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  The HMO Research Network Virtual Data Warehouse: A Public Data Model to Support Collaboration.

Authors:  Tyler R Ross; Daniel Ng; Jeffrey S Brown; Roy Pardee; Mark C Hornbrook; Gene Hart; John F Steiner
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2014-03-24

10.  Predictive modeling of structured electronic health records for adverse drug event detection.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Aron Henriksson; Lars Asker; Henrik Boström
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  10 in total

1.  Leveraging the potential of machine learning for assessing vascular ageing: state-of-the-art and future research.

Authors:  Vasiliki Bikia; Terence Fong; Rachel E Climie; Rosa-Maria Bruno; Bernhard Hametner; Christopher Mayer; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Peter H Charlton
Journal:  Eur Heart J Digit Health       Date:  2021-10-18

2.  Machine learning approaches improve risk stratification for secondary cardiovascular disease prevention in multiethnic patients.

Authors:  Ashish Sarraju; Andrew Ward; David Scheinker; Fàtima Rodríguez; Sukyung Chung; Jiang Li
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-10

3.  Prediction of 2-Year Major Adverse Limb Event-Free Survival After Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting for Lower Limb Atherosclerosis Obliterans: A Machine Learning-Based Study.

Authors:  Tianyue Pan; Xiaolang Jiang; Hao Liu; Yifan Liu; Weiguo Fu; Zhihui Dong
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-09

4.  Perceptions of Canadian vascular surgeons toward artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Authors:  Ben Li; Charles de Mestral; Muhammad Mamdani; Mohammed Al-Omran
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2022-07-19

5.  Performance and usability testing of an automated tool for detection of peripheral artery disease using electronic health records.

Authors:  I Ghanzouri; S Amal; V Ho; L Safarnejad; J Cabot; C G Brown-Johnson; N Leeper; S Asch; N H Shah; E G Ross
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Leveraging Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence to Improve Peripheral Artery Disease Detection, Treatment, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Alyssa M Flores; Falen Demsas; Nicholas J Leeper; Elsie Gyang Ross
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 23.213

7.  Personalized prediction of live birth prior to the first in vitro fertilization treatment: a machine learning method.

Authors:  Jiahui Qiu; Pingping Li; Meng Dong; Xing Xin; Jichun Tan
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 8.  The Role of Circulating Biomarkers in Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Authors:  Goren Saenz-Pipaon; Esther Martinez-Aguilar; Josune Orbe; Arantxa González Miqueo; Leopoldo Fernandez-Alonso; Jose Antonio Paramo; Carmen Roncal
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Machine learning in vascular surgery: a systematic review and critical appraisal.

Authors:  Ben Li; Tiam Feridooni; Cesar Cuen-Ojeda; Teruko Kishibe; Charles de Mestral; Muhammad Mamdani; Mohammed Al-Omran
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-01-19

Review 10.  Artificial Intelligence Evidence-Based Current Status and Potential for Lower Limb Vascular Management.

Authors:  Xenia Butova; Sergey Shayakhmetov; Maxim Fedin; Igor Zolotukhin; Sergio Gianesini
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-12-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.