| Literature DB >> 30857348 |
Katsuhiro Konno1, Kohei Kazuma2, Marisa Rangel3, Joacir Stolarz-de-Oliveira4, Renato Fontana5, Marii Kawano6, Hiroyuki Fuchino7, Izumi Hide8, Tadashi Yasuhara9, Yoshihiro Nakata10.
Abstract
Comprehensive LC-MS and MS/MS analysis of the crude venom extract from the solitary eumenine wasp Eumenes micado revealed the component profile of this venom mostly consisted of small peptides. The major peptide components, eumenine mastoparan-EM1 (EMP-EM1: LKLMGIVKKVLGAL-NH₂) and eumenine mastoparan-EM2 (EMP-EM2: LKLLGIVKKVLGAI-NH₂), were purified and characterized by the conventional method. The sequences of these new peptides are homologous to mastoparans, the mast cell degranulating peptides from social wasp venoms; they are 14 amino acid residues in length, rich in hydrophobic and basic amino acids, and C-terminal amidated. Accordingly, these new peptides can belong to mastoparan peptides (in other words, linear cationic α-helical peptides). Indeed, the CD spectra of these new peptides showed predominantly α-helix conformation in TFE and SDS. In biological evaluation, both peptides exhibited potent antibacterial activity, moderate degranulation activity from rat peritoneal mast cells, and significant leishmanicidal activity, while they showed virtually no hemolytic activity on human or mouse erythrocytes. These results indicated that EMP-EM peptides rather strongly associated with bacterial cell membranes rather than mammalian cell membranes.Entities:
Keywords: amphipathic α-helix structure.; linear cationic α-helical peptide; mastoparan peptide; solitary wasp; venom
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30857348 PMCID: PMC6468405 DOI: 10.3390/toxins11030155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Mastoparan peptides in wasp venom.
| Mastoparan | INLKALAALAKKIL-NH2 | EMP-AF | INLLKIAKGIIKSL-NH2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMP-EF | FDVMGIIKKIASAL-NH2 | EMP-OD | GRILSFIKGLAEHL-NH2 |
| EMP-ER | FDIMGLIKKVAGAL-NH2 | OdVP3 | KDLHTVVSAILQAL-NH2 |
| EMP-EM1 | LKLMGIVKKVLGAL-NH2 | EpVP2a | FDLLGLVKKVASAL-NH2 |
| EMP-EM2 | LKLLGIVKKVLGAI-NH2 | EpVP2b | FDLLGLVKSVVSAL-NH2 |
Figure 1(A) TIC profile from LC-ESI-MS of venom extracts of Eumenes micado, injected with 10% of crude venom extract of a single specimen to reverse-phase HPLC using CAPCELL PAK C18 (1.5 × 150 mm) with linear gradient of 5–65% CH3CN/H2O/0.1% formic acid over 20 min at flow rate of 200 μL/min. (B) Fractionation of venom extracts of Eumenes micado by reverse-phase HPLC using CAPCELL PAK C18 (10 × 250 mm) with linear gradient of 5–65% CH3CN/H2O/0.1% TFA over 30 min at flow rate of 2.5 mL/min. UV absorption was monitored at 215 nm.
On-line mass fingerprinting of crude venom extract from Eumenes micado by LC-ESI-MS.
| Fr. No. | Retention Time (min) | [M + H]+
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0–1.5 | 90.054, 106.049, 112.086, 116.070, 118.085, 120.065, 147.076, 147.112, 148.060, 156.076, 175.118, 184.072, 487.358 |
| 2 | 1.5–2.0 | 132.101, 150.057, 182.080, 268.102, 269.087, 284.097, 317.239, 336.157, 339.237, 348.068, 361.206, 374.324, 418.314, 664.113 |
| 3 | 2.0–3.0 | 166.085, 428.035 |
| 4 | 3.0–4.0 | 302.206, 320.162, 359.227, 756.532 |
| 5 | 4.0–5.0 | 346.232, 372.258, 473.306, 999.663, 1080.504, 2064.020 |
| 6 | 5.0–6.0 | 599.421, 955.662, 1029.681, 1316.626 |
| 7 | 6.0–7.0 | 471.326, 543.383, 939.669, 1011.722 |
| 8 | 7.0–8.0 | 589.331, 883.631, 901.584, 969.639, 2257.190, 2413.290, 3225.613, 4898.1853 |
| 9 | 8.0–9.0 | 582.256, 931.577, 996.686, 1050.594, 1109.697, 1125.691, 1241.615, 1510.765 |
| 10 | 9.0–10.0 | 564.299, 1046.653, 1973.176, 2039.289 |
| 11 | 10.0–10.4 | 940.575, 1074.226, 1449.976, 2607.505 |
| 12 | 10.4–11.4 | 918.559, 1350.095, 1368.902, 1497.980 |
| 13 | 11.4–12.0 | 815.497, 1222.854, 1481.986, 1539.990 |
| 14 | 12.0–12.5 | 1464.032 |
| 15 | 12.5–13.0 | 2113.272, 2095.261 |
| 16 | 13.0–14.0 | 1518.894, 2078.259 |
| 17 | 14.0–14.5 | 1353.871, 1345.833, 1505.866, 3564.943 |
| 18 | 14.5–15.2 | 1500.941, 1502.903, 1558.943, 1701.020, 1703.984 |
Small molecules in the crude venom extract from Eumenes micado by LC-ESI-MS.
| Retention Time (min) | [M + H]+
|
|---|---|
| 1.10 | 112.086 (histamine), 147.112 (lysine), 156.076 (histidine) |
| 1.24 | 175.118 (arginine) |
| 1.31 | 90.054 (alanine), 106.049 (serine), 116.070 (proline), 118.085 (valine), 120.065 (threonine), 147.076 (glutamine), 148.060 (glutamic acid) |
| 1.53 | 348.068 (AMP) |
| 1.60 | 150.057 (methionine), 664.112 (NAD) |
| 1.68 | 154.085 (dopamine) |
| 1.75 | 132.101 (leucine/isoleucine), 138.090 (tyramine), 268.102 (adenosine) |
| 1.83 | 182.080 (tyrosine) |
| 1.98 | 269.087 (inosine), 284.097 (guanosine) |
| 2.21 | 428.035 (ADP) |
| 2.44 | 166.085 (phenylalanine) |
| 2.67 | 122.096 (phenethylamine) |
| 4.30 | 205.096 (tryptophan) |
Peptide sequences analyzed from MS/MS spectra.
| Fr. No. | [M + H]+ | Sequence | Fr. No. | [M + H]+ | Sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 361.206 | VVSG | 10 | 564.299 | FDLLG |
| 1046.653 | FDLLGLLKK | ||||
| 4 | 302.206 | LLG | 12 | 918.559 | FDLGLLK |
| 320.162 | LMG | 1350.095 | KLLGLVKKVLGAL-NH2 | ||
| 359.227 | VLQ | 1368.902 | KLMGLVKKVLGAL-NH2 | ||
| 756.532 | LVKKVLG | 1497.980 | LKLmGLVKKVLGAL-NH2 | ||
| 5 | 346.232 | LLT | 13 | 815.497 | PVGFLGLL |
| 6 | 599.421 | KVLGAL-NH2 | 14 | 1464.032 | LKLGLVKKVLGAL-NH2 |
| 955.662 | LLKKVVGSL-NH2 | ||||
| 1029.681 | LKKMGLVKK | ||||
| 7 | 471.326 | VLGAL-NH2 | 16 | 1518.894 | FDLGmLVKKVLAGL-NH2 |
| 543.383 | LKLLG | ||||
| 939.669 | LVKQKVLL-NH2 | ||||
| 1011.722 | LKLLGLVKK | ||||
| 8 | 589.331 | PVGFLG | 17 | 1353.871 | DLLGLLKKVVSGL-NH2 |
| 883.631 | LKLLGLVK | ||||
| 901.584 | LKLMGLVK | ||||
| 969.639 | LNLLKLAKG | ||||
| 9 | 582.256 | FDLGM | 18 | 1500.941 | FDLLGLLKKVVSGL-NH2 |
| 931.577 | TLKVGSLLT | ||||
| 1109.697 | VLNVLNVLL-NH2 | ||||
| 1125.691 | VLNTQNVLL-NH2 | ||||
| 1241.615 | LKLMGLVKKVL |
L = either L or I; m = methionine S-oxide.
Peptides related to EMP-EMs.
| RT | [M + H]+ | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 7.16 | 901.584 | LKLMGLVK |
| 6.02 | 1029.681 | LKLMGLVKK |
| 8.81 | 1241.615 | LKLMGLVKKVL |
| 1.88 | 336.157 | LmG |
| 3.09 | 320.162 | LMG |
| 3.32 | 756.532 | LVKKVLG |
| 4.94 | 372.259 | LGAL-NH2 |
| 6.55 | 471.326 | VLGAL-NH2 |
| 5.12 | 599.420 | KVLGAL-NH2 |
| 10.65 | 1368.906 | KLMGLVKKVLGAL-NH2 |
| 10.64 | 1497.980 | LKLmGLVKKVLGAL-NH2 |
| 11.72 | 1481.987 | LKLMGLVKKVLGAL-NH2 (EMP-EM1) |
| 11.59 | 1539.995 | LKLMGLVKKVLGALG |
|
| ||
| 6.80 | 543.883 | LKLLG |
| 7.64 | 883.631 | LKLLGLVK |
| 6.47 | 1011.722 | LKLLGLVKK |
| 3.63 | 302.206 | LLG |
| 10.84 | 1350.095 | KLLGLVKKVLGAL-NH2 |
| 12.12 | 1464.032 | LKLLGLVKKVLGAL-NH2 (EMP-EM2) |
|
| ||
| 9.25 | 564.299 | FDLLG |
| 10.77 | 918.559 | FDLLGLLK |
| 9.54 | 1046.653 | FDLLGLLKK |
| 1.73 | 361.206 | VVSG |
| 4.73 | 473.305 | VVSGL-NH2 |
| 5.35 | 955.662 | LLKKVVSGL-NH2 |
| 14.42 | 1353.871 | DLLGLLKKVVSGL-NH2 |
| 14.76 | 1500.940 | FDLLGLLKKVVSGL-NH2 (EMP-EM3) |
| 14.57 | 1558.951 | FDLLGLLKKVVSGLG |
|
| ||
| 8.83 | 582.256 | FDLGM |
| 14.43 | 1355.833 | DLGMLVKKVVSGL-NH2 |
| 13.50 | 1518.895 | FDLGmLVKKVVSGL-NH2 |
| 14.89 | 1502.902 | FDLGMLVKKVVSGL-NH2 (EMP-EM4) |
L = either L or I; m = methionine S-oxide.
Unknown peptides.
| RT | [M + H]+ | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| 8.58 | 931.575 | TLKVGSLLT |
| 8.51 | 1125.691 | VLNTQLNVLL-NH2 |
| 8.67 | 1109.697 | VLNVNLNVLL-NH2 |
| 7.91 | 589.331 | PVGFLG |
| 11.89 | 815.498 | PVGFLGLL |
| 11.59 | 1222.851 | LLGLSLVLGLLL-NH2 |
L = either L or I; m = methionine S-oxide.
Figure 2Helical wheel projection of the sequence of EMP-EM1 and EMP-EM2. In this view, through the helix axis, the hydrophilic Lys (K) residues are located on one side and the hydrophobic Val (V), Ile (I), and Leu (L) residues on the other side of the helix.
Figure 3CD spectra of peptides at 10 µM, in different environments, at 25 °C. (A) EMP-EM1, (B) EMP-EM2.
Physicochemical parameters and α-helical content in different environments of EMP-EM1 and EMP-EM2 in comparison to other mastoparan peptides.
| Peptides | N | Q | C-term | <H> |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TFE | SDS | PC | ||||||
|
| 14 | +4 | amide | 0.104 | 0.258 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.11 |
|
| 14 | +4 | amide | 0.138 | 0.278 | 0.37 | 0.41 | <0.03 |
|
| 14 | +4 | amide | 0.051 | 0.342 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.16 |
|
| 14 | +2 | amide | 0.131 | 0.251 | 0.53 | 0.59 | nd |
|
| 14 | +2 | amide | 0.115 | 0.279 | 0.41 | 0.44 | nd |
N, number of residues; Q, net charge; C-term, C-terminal;
Figure 4Degranulation activity in rat peritoneal mast cells. The activity was determined by measuring the release of the granule marker, β-hexosaminidase, which co-localizes with histamine, and the values for β-hexosaminidase released in the medium were expressed as the percentage of total β-hexosaminidase, which was determined in the cells lysed in 0.1% Triton X-100.
Antimicrobial activity of EMP peptides.
| Microorganism | MIC (µM) * | |
|---|---|---|
| EM1 | EM2 | |
|
| ||
| 34 | 17 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 34 | 34 | |
| 68 | 68 | |
| NA** | NA | |
|
| ||
| 7 | 3 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| NA | NA | |
| NA | 34 | |
|
| ||
| NA | NA | |
Note: * MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration. ** NA: no activity at 67 or 68 μM (100 μg/mL).
Leishmanicidal activity of the mastoparan peptides.
| Peptide | IC50 (μM) * |
|---|---|
| EMP-EM1 | 36 |
| EMP-EM2 | 36 |
| EMP-ER | 20 ** |
| EMP-EF | 40 ** |
| EMP-AF | 35 ** |
Note: * IC50: 50% inhibitory concentration. ** Rangel. M. et al. [11].