| Literature DB >> 30857235 |
Fedia Ben Mefteh1,2, Fakher Frikha3, Amal Daoud4, Ali Chenari Bouket5, Lenka Luptakova6,7, Faizah N Alenezi8, Bader S Al-Anzi9, Tomasz Oszako10, Neji Gharsallah11, Lassaad Belbahri12,13.
Abstract
To explore proteolytic activity of endophytic fungi inhabiting date palm roots, aEntities:
Keywords: Box-Behnken; Endophytic fungi; Penicillium bilaiae; protease; response surface methodology
Year: 2019 PMID: 30857235 PMCID: PMC6462932 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7030074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Plackett-Burman design for screening of significant factors affecting the protease production by Penicillium bilaiae.
| Run | Initial pH | Temperature (°C) | MgSO4 (g/L) | NaNO3 (g/L) | KH2PO4 (g/L) | KCl (g/L) | Glucose (g/L) | Response (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 40 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 8 | 56.56 |
| 2 | 4 | 40 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 14 | 35.40 |
| 3 | 8 | 20 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 14 | 62.07 |
| 4 | 4 | 40 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 14 | 38.93 |
| 5 | 4 | 20 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 8 | 53.81 |
| 6 | 4 | 20 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 14 | 77.83 |
| 7 | 8 | 20 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 14 | 21.16 |
| 8 | 8 | 40 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 8 | 83.58 |
| 9 | 8 | 40 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 14 | 57.62 |
| 10 | 4 | 40 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 8 | 41.82 |
| 11 | 8 | 20 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 8 | 186.21 |
| 12 | 4 | 20 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 8 | 59.60 |
| 13 | 6 | 30 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 53.88 |
| 14 | 6 | 30 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 43.73 |
| 15 | 6 | 30 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 50.22 |
Levels of variables tested in Box Behnken Design (BBD) for optimization of protease production.
| Factor | Range and Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 20 | 30 | 40 | |
| 8 | 11 | 14 | |
| 4 | 6 | 8 | |
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree based on 18S rRNA sequence highlighting the phylogenetic position of Penicillium bilaiae TDPEF30 within closely related Penicillium spp. Talaromyces veerkampii (CBS 500.78, KF741984) was used as an outgroup. Bootstrap values are expressed as percentage of 1000 replicates.
Determination of significant variables for production of protease by the endophytic fungus Penicillium bilaiae using Plackett-Burman Design.
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean of Square | Prob > | Contribution % | Effect | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 9385.037 | 7 | 1340.720 | 4.345 | 0.047 | ||
| A-pH | 673.051 | 1 | 673.051 | 2.181 | 0.190 | 4.24 | 14.98 |
| B-Temperature | 6325.480 | 1 | 6325.480 | 20.499 | 0.004 | 39.81 | −45.92 |
| C-MgSO4 | 302.304 | 1 | 302.304 | 0.980 | 0.361 | 1.90 | −10.04 |
| D-NaNO3 | 75.350 | 1 | 75.350 | 0.244 | 0.639 | 0.47 | −5.01 |
| E-KH2PO4 | 229.425 | 1 | 229.425 | 0.744 | 0.422 | 1.44 | −8.75 |
| F-KCl | 50.225 | 1 | 50.225 | 0.163 | 0.701 | 0.32 | −4.09 |
| G-Glucose | 1729.200 | 1 | 1729.200 | 5.604 | 0.056 | 10.88 | 24.01 |
Box Behnken matrix and response results for optimization of protease.
| Run | Factors | Protease Activity U/mL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Experimental | Predicted | |||
| 1 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 417.57 | 386.82 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 6.20 | 4.80 |
| 3 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 328.69 | 529.61 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.61 | 6.58 |
| 5 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 144.73 | 122.41 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 3.73 | 4.71 |
| 7 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 390.76 | 309.52 |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.05 | 1.24 |
| 9 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 329.40 | 315.42 |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 441.55 | 431.85 |
| 11 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 177.04 | 257.53 |
| 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 480.34 | 352.59 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 398.52 | 329.56 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 292.72 | 329.56 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 306.83 | 329.56 |
Analysis of variance for surface response.
| Source of Variation | Sum of Squares | df | Mean of Square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | 61.34 | 7 | 8.76 | 78.84 | <0.0001 * |
| Residual | 0.78 | 7 | 0.11 | ||
| Cor Total | 62.12 | 14 |
* Statistically significant at 95% of confidence level. Std. Dev. = 0.333, R2 = 0.987.
Experimental condition of the check-points.
| Run | Variables Values | Response (U/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Experimental | Predicted | |||
| 1 | 24.46 | 13.75 | 6.26 | 1086.95 | 924.23 |
| 2 | 24.09 | 13.78 | 5.59 | 744.85 | 842.16 |
X1 temperature, X2 glucose concentration, X3 initial pH.
Validation of the model with the check-points.
| Run |
|
| Residual | t.exp. | Laverage (dU) | Signif.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.991 | 6.830 | 0.161 | 0.437 | 0.224 | 67.50 | |
| 6.613 | 6.737 | −0,124 | −0,335 | 0.235 | 74.72 |
yi = Ln(Yexp.); ŷi = Ln(Ycalc.).
Figure 2Response surface of protease production from the endophytic fungus Penicillium bilaiae showing the interactive effects of the temperature versus glucose concentration (A); culture pH versus temperature and glucose (B); concentration versus initial pH (C).
Figure 3Effect of various sources of carbon (A) and nitrogen (B) on protease production using C/N ratio. YE yeast extract, AS ammonium sulfate, CP casein peptone, ME malt extract.
Figure 4Effect of pH on the activity (A) and the stability (B) of the proteolytic enzymes of Penicillium bilaiae.
Figure 5Effect of temperature on the activity (A) and the stability (B) of proteolytic enzyme of Penicillium bilaiae.
Effect of metal ions (5 mM), detergents (0.1%) and enzyme inhibitors (5 mM) on protease activity of the endophytic fungus Penicillium bilaiae.
| Chemicals | Concentrations | Units | Relative Activity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | - | - | 100 |
| Cu2+ | 5 | mM | 21 ± 3 |
| Ca2+ | 5 | mM | 32 ± 4 |
| Fe2+ | 5 | mM | 54 ± 1 |
| Zn2+ | 5 | mM | 100 |
| Mn2+ | 5 | mM | 114 ± 2 |
| Hg2+ | 5 | mM | 14 ± 4 |
| B3+ | 5 | mM | 191 ± 1 |
| Na2+ | 5 | mM | 100 |
| PMSF | 5 | mM | 0 |
| EDTA | 5 | mM | 100 |
| β-Mercaptoethanol | 5 | mM | 100 |
| DTT | 5 | mM | 100 |
| Tween 80 | 0.1 | % | 181 ± 1 |
| CHAPS | 0.1 | % | 83 ± 1 |
| Triton X-100 | 0.1 | % | 193 ± 2 |