| Literature DB >> 30857165 |
Paolo Raggi1, Napoleone Prandini2, Guido Ligabue3, Giovanni Braglia4, Francesco Esposito5, Jovana Milic6,7, Andrea Malagoli8, Riccardo Scaglioni9, Giulia Besutti10, Barbara Beghetto11, Giulia Nardini12, Enrica Roncaglia13, Cristina Mussini14, Giovanni Guaraldi15.
Abstract
18F-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) accumulates in areas of active hydroxyapatite deposition and potentially unstable atherosclerotic plaques. We assessed the presence of atherosclerotic plaques in 50 adult patients with HIV (HIV+) who had undergone two cardiac computed tomography scans to measure coronary artery calcium (CAC) progression. CAC and its progression are predictive of an unfavorable prognosis. Tracer uptake was quantified in six arterial territories: aortic arch, innominate carotid artery, right and left internal carotid arteries, left coronary (anterior descending and circumflex) and right coronary artery. Thirty-one patients showed CAC progression and 19 did not. At least one territory with high NaF uptake was observed in 150 (50%) of 300 arterial territories. High NaF uptake was detected more often in non-calcified than calcified areas (68% vs. 32%), and in patients without than in those with prior CAC progression (68% vs. 32%). There was no correlation between clinical and demographic variables and NaF uptake. In clinically stable HIV+ patients, half of the arterial territories showed a high NaF uptake, often in the absence of macroscopic calcification. NaF uptake at one time point did not correlate with prior progression of CAC. Prospective studies will demonstrate the prognostic significance of high NaF uptake in HIV+ patients.Entities:
Keywords: atherosclerosis; calcification; immune deficiency syndrome; sodium fluoride
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30857165 PMCID: PMC6429185 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20051183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Patients’ clinical characteristics.
| Variables | Total | No Progression | Progression | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 19(38%) | 31(62%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Age, mean (±SD) | 57.1 (7.82) | 52.53 (4.64) | 59.9 (8.1) |
|
| Men (%) | 42 (84%) | 13 (68.42%) | 29 (93.55%) |
|
| Pack year smoking, median (IQR) | 15 (0–33.75) | 16.88 (6.5–30.2) | 13.2 (0–34.5) | 0.88 |
| BMI, kg/m2, mean (±SD) | 26.01 (4.14) | 25.66 (4.2) | 26.21 (4.16) | 0.67 |
| Waist circumference, cm, mean (±SD) | 96.78 (11.3) | 96.81 (11.65) | 96.76 (11.31) | 0.99 |
|
| ||||
| Nadir CD4 c/microL, median (IQR) | 200 (107.5–324) | 249.5 (142.75–430.5) | 170 (59–286) |
|
| HIV duration, months, median (IQR) | 277.5 (191.25–354) | 267 (113–340) | 287 (239.5–358.5) | 0.19 |
| CD4/CD8 ratio, mean (±SD) | 0.97 (0.41) | 1.01 (0.37) | 0.94 (0.44) | 0.60 |
| Undetectable HIV viral load (%) | 50 (100%) | 19 (100%) | 31 (100%) | 1.0 |
| Cumulative exposure to INSTIs, months, median (IQR) | 36 (14–73.5) | 28.5 (5.5–47.25) [ | 39 (23–98) | 0.12 |
| Cumulative exposure to NNRTIs, months, median (IQR) | 63.5 (29.25–123.75) | 39.5 (24–77.5) [ | 79.5 (29.75–126.5) | 0.23 |
| Cumulative exposure to NRTIs, months, median (IQR) | 169 (103.5–235) | 128 (55–196) | 187.5 (136–251.75) | 0.03 |
| Cumulative exposure to PIs, months, median (IQR) | 123 (51–172) | 94.5 (50.75–136.5) | 129 (51–188) | 0.19 |
|
| ||||
| CRP, mean (±SD) | 0.24 (0.29) | 0.22 (0.15) | 0.25 (0.35) | 0.57 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL, mean (±SD) | 160.2 (160.51) | 206.53 (231.96) | 133.03 (92.68) | 0.16 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL, mean (±SD) | 103.26 (33.04) | 124.71 (31.33) | 90.69 (27.39) |
|
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL, mean (±SD) | 46.13 (12.07) | 45.59 (11.25) | 46.45 (12.72) | 0.82 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL, mean (±SD) | 173.15 (39.83) | 198.88 (29.03) | 158.07 (37.83) |
|
| Glucose, mg/dL, mean (±SD) | 103.26 (31.15) | 95.06 (16.17) | 108.34 (36.94) | 0.30 |
| HOMA, mean (±SD) | 3.52 (4.24) | 3.62 (3.06) | 3.46 (4.97) | 0.22 |
| CKD-Epi, mL/min/1.73m2, mean (±SD) | 79.77 (22.49) | 85.73 (21.72) | 76.33 (22.78) | 0.28 |
|
| ||||
| CKD (%) | 19 (38%) | 5 (26.32%) | 14 (45.16%) | 0.30 |
| COPD (%) | 4 (8%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (12.9%) | 0.27 |
| Osteoporosis (%) | 15 (30%) | 4 (21.05%) | 11 (35.48%) | 0.44 |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 49 (98%) | 19 (100%) | 30 (96.77%) | 1 |
|
| ||||
| Statin use (%) | 7 (14%) | 2 (10.53%) | 5 (16.13%) | 0.89 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg, mean (±SD) | 127.25 (15.29) | 121.94 (11.34) | 130.43 (16.59) | 0.08 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg, mean (±SD) | 81.58 (8.82) | 81.33 (8.51) | 81.73 (9.15) | 0.88 |
| ASCVD, mean (±SD) | 10.31 (9.9) | 7.39 (7.05) | 13.59 (11.99) | 0.21 |
| Calcium score, median (IQR), | 104 (38.5–348) | 4 (2–6) | 206 (104–490) |
|
| Hypertension (%) | 33 (66%) | 8 (42.11%) | 25 (80.65%) |
|
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus (%) | 14 (28%) | 5 (26.32%) | 9 (29.03%) | 1 |
| CVD (%) | 7 (14%) | 1 (5.26%) | 6 (19.35%) | 0.33 |
|
| ||||
| Aortic arch TBR | 1.65 (0.52) | 1.53 (0.51) | 1.73 (0.52) | 0.16 |
| Innominate artery TBR | 1.66 (0.49) | 1.67 (0.57) | 1.65 (0.45) | 0.87 |
| Right carotid artery TBR | 1.69 (0.8) | 1.59 (0.72) | 1.75 (0.85) | 0.42 |
| Left carotid artery TBR | 1.64 (0.66) | 1.51 (0.69) | 1.72 (0.63) | 0.14 |
| RCA TBR | 1.65 (0.41) | 1.6 (0.39) | 1.67 (0.43) | 0.55 |
| LCA TBR | 2.08 (0.66) | 1.93 (0.43) | 2.17 (0.76) | 0.42 |
Legend: ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score: BMI: body mass index. CKD: chronic kidney disease. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CRP: C-reactive protein. CVD: cardiovascular disease. HDL: high density lipoprotein. HOMA: homeostatic model assessment INSTI: integrase strand transfer inhibitors. LCA: left coronary artery. LDL: low density lipoprotein. NNRTI: non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. NRTI: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. PI: protease inhibitors. RCA: right coronary artery. TBR: target to background ratio.
Figure 1Example of carotid artery 18F-Sodium Fluoride uptake in a 50 years old patient with HIV. The image on the left is a coronal reconstrution of the PET image of the neck and base of the skull of this patient. The white arrow points at one of several areas of enhanced 18F-Sodium Fluoride uptake along the course of the right internal carotid artery. The image on the top right is an axial computed tomography section of the neck of the same patient, and the white arrow points at a calcified lesion corresponding to the lesion seen on the PET image on the left. The bottom right image is a fusion of axial PET and CT images; the white arrow points again at the same lesion shown in the axial CT image above, demonstrating 18F-Sodium Fluoride uptake in correspondence with the calcification.
Figure 2Proportion of patients showing high 18F-Sodium Fluoride uptake in 6 arterial territories. Only one patient had no uptake while 80% of the patients showed enhanced uptake in 1–4 territories.
Figure 3Proportional distribution of 18F-Sodium Fluoride uptake assessed as target-to-background ratio in each arterial territory. The vertical line identifies a target-to-background ratio of 1.6 that was chosen as a threshold for high 18F-Sodium Fluoride uptake.