| Literature DB >> 30856540 |
Ryuta Kinno1, Yukiko Mori2, Satomi Kubota2, Shohei Nomoto3, Akinori Futamura2, Azusa Shiromaru2, Takeshi Kuroda2, Satoshi Yano2, Seiichiro Ishigaki4, Hidetomo Murakami2, Yasuhiko Baba3, Kenjiro Ono5.
Abstract
The issue of whether serum lipid marker values are cognitively and neurologically significant for elderly individuals attending a memory clinic has been controversial. We investigated the associations of serum lipid markers with the memory function and cortical structure in 52 patients aged ≥75 years who had attended our memory clinic based on their subjective memory complaints. None had a history of medication for hyperlipidemia. The Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) was administered to all patients for the assessment of their memory function. Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), and triglyceride (TG) were measured for each patient. Surface-based morphometry (SBM) was performed for the calculation of each patient's cortical thickness and gyrification index based on structural MRI data. Our analyses revealed that the serum HDLC level was positively and significantly correlated with the WMS-R subtests of visual paired associates I/II and logical memory I (p < 0.05). The serum TG level was negatively correlated with the logical memory I subtest. The SBM results showed positive correlations between the serum HDLC level and the gyrification indices of the bilateral insular and frontal opercular cortices, and those two gyrification indices were positively correlated with the logical memory I and visual paired associates I/II. These results suggest that in these elderly patients, a high serum HDLC level was associated with not only preserved memory function but also gyrification of the insular and frontal opercular cortex. We conclude that elderly individuals' serum lipid markers should be carefully assessed in memory clinic settings, because serum HDLC may be a biomarker for memory function and cortical structure.Entities:
Keywords: Elderly; Frontal opercular cortex; Gyrification; High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Insular cortex; Memory
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30856540 PMCID: PMC6411909 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101746
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Demographics of the 52 elderly participants.
| Female (n = 31) | male (n = 21) | Statistical value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 82.6 ± 0.88 | 82.9 ± 1.07 | Z = 0.21, p = 0.83 |
| Education | 12. 8 ± 2.78 | 11.5 ± 2.32 | Z = 1.78, p = 0.076 |
| Serum lipid markers | |||
| TG (50–149 mg /dl) | 137.8 ± 74.89 | 153.0 ± 129.95 | Z = 0.18, p = 0.86 |
| HDLC (male: 40–80; female: 40–90 mg /dl) | 63.5 ± 12.48 | 57.4 ± 16.75 | Z = 1.43, p = 0.15 |
| LDLC (70–139 mg /dl) | 126.2 ± 27.20 | 99.7 ± 29.04 | Z = 3.20, p = 0.0014 |
| WMS-R | |||
| Visual Reproduction I | 18.6 ± 8.98 | 17.5 ± 10.18 | Z = 0.48, p = 0.63 |
| Visual Reproduction II | 5.6 ± 8.30 | 5.6 ± 10.08 | Z = 0.67, p = 0.50 |
| Logical Memory I | 8.5 ± 5.93 | 7.6 ± 6.51 | Z = 0.52, p = 0.61 |
| Logical Memory II | 3.0 ± 4.40 | 2.9 ± 5.3 | Z = 0.69, p = 0.49 |
| Verbal Paired Associates I | 7.9 ± 6.08 | 5.8 ± 5.0 | Z = 1.29, p = 0.20 |
| Verbal Paired Associates II | 3.2 ± 2.88 | 2.6 ± 2.22 | Z = 0.75, p = 0.45 |
| Visual Paired Associates I | 4.7 ± 4.76 | 3.5 ± 4.2 | Z = 0.85, p = 0.40 |
| Visual Paired Associates II | 1.9 ± 2.12 | 1.9 ± 2.00 | Z = 0.11, p = 0.91 |
| Design memory | 4.4 ± 1.89 | 4.2 ± 1.76 | Z = 0.029, p = 0.98 |
| Digit span | 10.2 ± 2.70 | 10.8 ± 4.06 | Z = 0.85, p = 0.39 |
| Mental control | 3.1 ± 1.53 | 3.1 ± 1.79 | Z = 0.087, p = 0.93 |
| Visual span | 12.3 ± 2.45 | 13.2 ± 4.11 | Z = 1.45, p = 0.15 |
Z-values are by Wilcoxon rank sum test.
p < 0.05.
Correlation coefficient between serum lipid markers and the WMS-R subtests.
| HDLC | LDLC | TG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | 61.1 ± 14.52 (mg/dl) | 115.5 ± 30.63 (mg/dl) | 144.0 ± 99.89 (mg/dl) | |
| Visual Reproduction I | 18.2 ± 9.40 | 0.0036 | 0.09 | 0.16 |
| Visual Reproduction II | 5.6 ± 8.96 | 0.25 | 0.004 | −0.18 |
| Logical Memory I | 8.1 ± 6.12 | 0.48 | 0.18 | −0.38 |
| Logical Memory II | 2.9 ± 4.74 | 0.20 | 0.27 | −0.17 |
| Verbal Paired Associates I | 7.0 ± 5.71 | 0.22 | 0.10 | −0.18 |
| Verbal Paired Associates II | 3.0 ± 2.63 | 0.18 | 0.09 | −0.20 |
| Visual Paired Associates I | 4.2 ± 4.54 | 0.32 | 0.06 | −0.24 |
| Visual Paired Associates II | 1.9 ± 2.01 | 0.36 | 0.20 | −0.24 |
| Design Memory | 4.3 ± 1.82 | 0.03 | 0.04 | −0.13 |
| Digit Span | 10.4 ± 3.29 | −0.07 | 0.02 | 0.003 |
| Mental Control | 3.1 ± 1.62 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.01 |
| Visual Span | 12.7 ± 3.22 | −0.03 | 0.18 | 0.23 |
Spearman's ρ-values are shown. Age and gender differences were controlled.
p < 0.05 (Bonferroni correction).
Fig. 1Brain regions with a significant association between the cortical gyrification index and the serum HDLC level. Significant regions are identified by SBM, which was projected onto the left and right lateral surfaces of the standard inflated brain. Medial sections are also shown. The threshold was set at p < 0.05 (TFCE, FWE-corrected). See Table 3 for the details of the regions. Note that no significant correlation was observed for the serum TG level. AVI: anterior ventral insular area, FOP4: frontal opercular area 4, L: left, MI: middle insular area.
Correlation between the gyrification index and HDLC levels.
| P-value | Size | Overlap of atlas region | P-value | Size | Overlap of atlas region | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left hemisphere | Right hemisphere | ||||||
| 0.02110 | 754 | 18% | Middle insular area | 0.01580 | 1678 | 9% | Area PFcm |
| 15% | Posterior insular area 2 | 8% | Frontal opercular area 4 | ||||
| 12% | Area 45 | 7% | Anterior ventral insular area | ||||
| 11% | Frontal opercular area 5 | 7% | Retroinsular cortex | ||||
| 10% | Posterior insular area 1 | 6% | Area OP2–3/VS | ||||
| 9% | Para-Insular area | 6% | Area 47 s | ||||
| 8% | Frontal opercular area 4 | 5% | Area 44 | ||||
| 6% | Anterior ventral insular area | 5% | Frontal opercular area 2 | ||||
| 5% | Area 44 | 5% | Insular granular complex | ||||
| 4% | Frontal opercular area 3 | 5% | Area OP4/PV | ||||
| 0.04920 | 80 | 58% | Area PFcm | 4% | Area OP1/SII | ||
| 24% | Retroinsular cortex | 4% | Frontal opercular area 3 | ||||
| 13% | PeriSylvian language area | 4% | Frontal opercular area 1 | ||||
| 6% | Area PF complex | 3% | Area PF complex | ||||
| 3% | Frontal opercular area 5 | ||||||
| 2% | Rostral area 6 | ||||||
| 2% | Area 47 m | ||||||
| 2% | Area 52 | ||||||
| 2% | Posterior insular area 2 | ||||||
| 2% | Medial belt complex | ||||||
| 2% | Middle insular area | ||||||
| 2% | Area PF opercular | ||||||
| 2% | Anterior agranular insula complex | ||||||
| 1% | PeriSylvian language area | ||||||
| 0.03920 | 343 | 32% | Area 9-46d | ||||
| 29% | Area 8Ad | ||||||
| 18% | Area 9 posterior | ||||||
| 15% | Area 46 | ||||||
| 7% | Area 8B lateral | ||||||
The threshold was set at p < 0.05 (TFCE, FWE-corrected). Each label of the brain regions was based on HCP multi-modal parcellation (Glasser et al., 2016).
Fig. 2Scatterplots of the association of the gyrification index of the insular and front operculum with the patients' scores on the logical memory I subtest. Spearman partial rank correlation tests showed a significant and positive correlation for each pair (each, p < 0.05). Each label of the brain regions was based on HCP multi-modal parcellation (Glasser et al., 2016). The gyrification index of the left middle insular area and the right frontal opercular area 4 were significantly correlated with the scores on the logical memory I subtest, which are shown in red and yellow, respectively. FOP4: frontal opercular area 4, L: left, MI: middle insular area, R: right. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Scatter plots of the association of the gyrification index of the insular and front operculum with the patients' scores on the visual paired associates I and II subtests. The gyrification index of right Frontal Opercular Area 4 was significantly correlated with the score of visual paired associates I and II, which is shown in yellow. The gyrification indices of the right middle insular area and right anterior ventral insular area were significantly correlated with the scores on the visual paired associates I/II subtests, which are shown in purple. AVI: Anterior ventral insular area; FOP4: Frontal opercular area 4; MI: Middle insular area; R: right. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)