James P Hunter1, Athanasios Saratzis2, Alex J Sutton3, Rebecca H Boucher3, Robert D Sayers4, Matthew J Bown5. 1. ST5 Vascular Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK. Electronic address: jhunter@doctors.net.uk. 2. ST3 General Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Infirmary square, UK. 3. Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RD, UK. 4. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RD, UK. 5. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, and the NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RD, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of funnel plots in assessing publication bias (PB) in meta-analyses of proportion studies. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Meta-analysis simulation study and meta-analysis of published literature reporting peri-operative mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Data for the simulation study were stochastically generated. A literature search of Medline and Embase was performed to identify studies for inclusion in the published literature meta-analyses. RESULTS: The simulation study demonstrated that conventionally constructed funnel plots (log odds vs. 1/standard error [1/SE]) for extreme proportional outcomes were asymmetric despite no PB. Alternative funnel plots constructed using study size rather than 1/SE showed no asymmetry for extreme proportional outcomes. When used in meta-analyses of the mortality of AAA repair, these alternative funnel plots highlighted the possibility for conventional funnel plots to demonstrate asymmetry when there was no evidence of PB. CONCLUSION: Conventional funnel plots used to assess for potential PB in meta-analyses are inaccurate for meta-analyses of proportion studies with low proportion outcomes. Funnel plots of study size against log odds may be a more accurate way of assessing for PB in these studies.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of funnel plots in assessing publication bias (PB) in meta-analyses of proportion studies. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Meta-analysis simulation study and meta-analysis of published literature reporting peri-operative mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Data for the simulation study were stochastically generated. A literature search of Medline and Embase was performed to identify studies for inclusion in the published literature meta-analyses. RESULTS: The simulation study demonstrated that conventionally constructed funnel plots (log odds vs. 1/standard error [1/SE]) for extreme proportional outcomes were asymmetric despite no PB. Alternative funnel plots constructed using study size rather than 1/SE showed no asymmetry for extreme proportional outcomes. When used in meta-analyses of the mortality of AAA repair, these alternative funnel plots highlighted the possibility for conventional funnel plots to demonstrate asymmetry when there was no evidence of PB. CONCLUSION: Conventional funnel plots used to assess for potential PB in meta-analyses are inaccurate for meta-analyses of proportion studies with low proportion outcomes. Funnel plots of study size against log odds may be a more accurate way of assessing for PB in these studies.
Authors: Annie-Claude M Lassemillante; Suhail A R Doi; John D Hooper; John B Prins; Olivia R L Wright Journal: Endocrine Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Pjj Herrod; H Boyd-Carson; B Doleman; Jem Blackwell; Ejo Hardy; F Harper; J N Lund Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: R Cirocchi; J J Randolph; G A Binda; S Gioia; B M Henry; K A Tomaszewski; M Allegritti; A Arezzo; R Marzaioli; P Ruscelli Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Matthew Wheelwright; Paige J Selvey; Paul Steinbok; Ash Singhal; George Ibrahim; Aria Fallah; Alexander G Weil; Kyle Halvorson; Albert Tu Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Adam J Waxman; Suparna Clasen; Wei-Ting Hwang; Alfred Garfall; Dan T Vogl; Joseph Carver; Rupal O'Quinn; Adam D Cohen; Edward A Stadtmauer; Bonnie Ky; Brendan M Weiss Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Hawult Taye; Kassahun Alemu; Adane Mihret; James L N Wood; Ziv Shkedy; Stefan Berg; Abraham Aseffa Journal: Zoonoses Public Health Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 2.702