Juan Wang1, Yaping Zhao2, Qianqian Chen1, Peng Zhang1, Wei Xie1, Jing Feng1, Jie Cao1. 1. Respiratory Department of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China. 2. Respiratory Department of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of pulmonary lesions-particularly, peripheral lung lesions-are identified with current technological advancements. Notably, the yield of traditional bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions is low. This study evaluated the diagnostic value of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during transbronchial biopsy for peripheral lung cancer. METHODS: This study included 641 patients who underwent transbronchial biopsy for suspected lung cancer at the Respiratory Department of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital between January 2012 and December 2016. Based on whether ROSE was used, patients were assigned to the ROSE group (353 patients) or non-ROSE group (288 patients). In the ROSE group, several air-dried smears were processed with Diff-Quik staining; the remaining samples were placed in 10% formalin. Diagnostic yields for central and peripheral lung cancer were compared between the two groups. In addition, ROSE results were compared with final diagnoses. RESULTS: Diagnostic yield for peripheral lung cancer, stratified by pathology, was significantly higher in the ROSE group than in the non-ROSE group (42.9% vs. 30.7%, P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of ROSE for peripheral pulmonary lesions were 90.0%, 89.5%, 94.0%, 82.8% and 89.8%, respectively. Conformance was high between ROSE and final pathologic evaluations during transbronchial biopsy (Kappa = 0.780, P = 0.035). There were no procedure-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: ROSE during conventional transbronchial biopsy improves diagnostic yield, stratified by pathology, for patients with peripheral lung cancer via live feedback. Moreover, ROSE diagnosis correlates with final cytopathological diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of pulmonary lesions-particularly, peripheral lung lesions-are identified with current technological advancements. Notably, the yield of traditional bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions is low. This study evaluated the diagnostic value of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during transbronchial biopsy for peripheral lung cancer. METHODS: This study included 641 patients who underwent transbronchial biopsy for suspected lung cancer at the Respiratory Department of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital between January 2012 and December 2016. Based on whether ROSE was used, patients were assigned to the ROSE group (353 patients) or non-ROSE group (288 patients). In the ROSE group, several air-dried smears were processed with Diff-Quik staining; the remaining samples were placed in 10% formalin. Diagnostic yields for central and peripheral lung cancer were compared between the two groups. In addition, ROSE results were compared with final diagnoses. RESULTS: Diagnostic yield for peripheral lung cancer, stratified by pathology, was significantly higher in the ROSE group than in the non-ROSE group (42.9% vs. 30.7%, P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of ROSE for peripheral pulmonary lesions were 90.0%, 89.5%, 94.0%, 82.8% and 89.8%, respectively. Conformance was high between ROSE and final pathologic evaluations during transbronchial biopsy (Kappa = 0.780, P = 0.035). There were no procedure-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: ROSE during conventional transbronchial biopsy improves diagnostic yield, stratified by pathology, for patients with peripheral lung cancer via live feedback. Moreover, ROSE diagnosis correlates with final cytopathological diagnosis.
Authors: Thomas R Gildea; Erik E Folch; Sandeep J Khandhar; Michael A Pritchett; Gregory P LeMense; Philip A Linden; Douglas A Arenberg; Otis B Rickman; Amit K Mahajan; Jaspal Singh; Joseph Cicenia; Atul C Mehta; Haiying Lin; Jennifer S Mattingley Journal: J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol Date: 2021-07-01