Literature DB >> 30854745

Activation-based association profiles differentiate network roles across cognitive loads.

Nianming Zuo1,2,3,4, Alireza Salami5,6,7, Yihong Yang8, Zhengyi Yang1,2, Jing Sui1,2,9, Tianzi Jiang1,2,3,9,10,11.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is a complex and pivotal cognitive system underlying the performance of many cognitive behaviors. Although individual differences in WM performance have previously been linked to the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response across several large-scale brain networks, the unique and shared contributions of each large-scale brain network to efficient WM processes across different cognitive loads remain elusive. Using a WM paradigm and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) from the Human Connectome Project, we proposed a framework to assess the association and shared-association strength between imaging biomarkers and behavioral scales. Association strength is the capability of individual brain regions to modulate WM performance and shared-association strength measures how different regions share the capability of modulating performance. Under higher cognitive load (2-back), the frontoparietal executive control network (FPN), dorsal attention network (DAN), and salience network showed significant positive activation and positive associations, whereas the default mode network (DMN) showed the opposite pattern, namely, significant deactivation and negative associations. Comparing the different cognitive loads, the DMN and FPN showed predominant associations and globally shared-associations. When investigating the differences in association from lower to higher cognitive loads, the DAN demonstrated enhanced association strength and globally shared-associations, which were significantly greater than those of the other networks. This study characterized how brain regions individually and collaboratively support different cognitive loads.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  association; cognitive performance; functional activation; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30854745      PMCID: PMC6865538          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  82 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  The frontoparietal attention network of the human brain: action, saliency, and a priority map of the environment.

Authors:  Radek Ptak
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 7.519

3.  Activation-based association profiles differentiate network roles across cognitive loads.

Authors:  Nianming Zuo; Alireza Salami; Yihong Yang; Zhengyi Yang; Jing Sui; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Intrinsic Brain Hub Connectivity Underlies Individual Differences in Spatial Working Memory.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Mingrui Xia; Zhengjia Dai; Xiaoying Wang; Xuhong Liao; Yanchao Bi; Yong He
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Growth of white matter in the adolescent brain: role of testosterone and androgen receptor.

Authors:  Jennifer S Perrin; Pierre-Yves Hervé; Gabriel Leonard; Michel Perron; G Bruce Pike; Alain Pitiot; Louis Richer; Suzanne Veillette; Zdenka Pausova; Tomás Paus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Age differences in the neural correlates of distraction regulation: A network interaction approach.

Authors:  Tarek Amer; John A E Anderson; Karen L Campbell; Lynn Hasher; Cheryl L Grady
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  When less is more: TPJ and default network deactivation during encoding predicts working memory performance.

Authors:  Alan Anticevic; Grega Repovs; Gordon L Shulman; Deanna M Barch
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Neurocognitive Architecture of Working Memory.

Authors:  Johan Eriksson; Edward K Vogel; Anders Lansner; Fredrik Bergström; Lars Nyberg
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Statistics review 7: Correlation and regression.

Authors:  Viv Bewick; Liz Cheek; Jonathan Ball
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension.

Authors:  Erez Simony; Christopher J Honey; Janice Chen; Olga Lositsky; Yaara Yeshurun; Ami Wiesel; Uri Hasson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  3 in total

1.  Activation-based association profiles differentiate network roles across cognitive loads.

Authors:  Nianming Zuo; Alireza Salami; Yihong Yang; Zhengyi Yang; Jing Sui; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Task-induced activation transmitted by structural connectivity is associated with behavioral performance.

Authors:  Tianyi Yan; Tiantian Liu; Jing Ai; Zhongyan Shi; Jian Zhang; Guangying Pei; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Neural function during emotion regulation and future depressive symptoms in youth at risk for affective disorders.

Authors:  Jay C Fournier; Michele Bertocci; Cecile D Ladouceur; Lisa Bonar; Kelly Monk; Halimah Abdul-Waalee; Amelia Versace; João Paulo Lima Santos; Satish Iyengar; Boris Birmaher; Mary L Phillips
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.294

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.