Literature DB >> 30854286

An Assessment of Three Procedures to Teach Echoic Responding.

Catia Cividini-Motta1,2,3, Nicole Scharrer1,2, William H Ahearn1,2.   

Abstract

The research literature has revealed mixed outcomes on various procedures for increasing vocalizations and echoic responding in persons with disabilities (Miguel, Carr, & Michael The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 3-13, 2002; Stock, Schulze, & Mirenda The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 123-133, 2008). We examined the efficacy of an assessment procedure for identifying the most effective echoic teaching procedure to six students diagnosed autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other developmental delays. The assessment procedure included a within-participant comparison of vocal imitation training (VIT), stimulus-stimulus pairing (SSP), and a mand-model procedure (MM). A functional analysis of the responses was conducted to determine whether responding was functionally an echoic or a mand. The results indicated that the assessment was effective in identifying a teaching procedure for five out of the six participants and that responding was established under echoic control. These outcomes support the efficacy of this assessment procedure for identifying effective echoic teaching procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Echoic; Functional analysis; Mand-model; Stimulus–stimulus pairing; Vocal imitation

Year:  2016        PMID: 30854286      PMCID: PMC6387752          DOI: 10.1007/s40616-016-0069-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav        ISSN: 0889-9401


  35 in total

1.  The speaker as listener: The interpretation of structural regularities in verbal behavior.

Authors:  D C Palmer
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  1998

2.  An experimental analysis of verbal imitation in preschool children.

Authors:  T A Brigham; J A Sherman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1968

3.  Achieving parity: The role of automatic reinforcement.

Authors:  D C Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.

Authors:  W W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; A Amari
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1996-07

5.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

6.  Using mand training to establish an echoic repertoire in young children with autism.

Authors:  P W Drash; R L High; R M Tudor
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  1999

7.  Using stimulus-stimulus pairing and direct reinforcement to teach vocal verbal behavior to young children with autism.

Authors:  Regina A Carroll; Kevin P Klatt
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2008

8.  The effects of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure on the vocal behavior of children diagnosed with autism.

Authors:  Caio F Miguel; James E Carr; Jack Michael
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2002

9.  Grammatical constructions in typical developing children: effects of explicit reinforcement, automatic reinforcement and parity.

Authors:  Leni Ostvik; Svein Eikeseth; Lars Klintwall
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2012

10.  Social validation of the New England Center For Children--Core Skills Assessment.

Authors:  Chata A Dickson; Rebecca P F MacDonald; Renee Mansfield; Paulo Guilhardi; Cammarie Johnson; William H Ahearn
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.