Literature DB >> 30853731

Evidence for a general factor of behavioral activation system sensitivity.

Nicholas J Kelley1, Amanda M Kramer1, Katherine S Young2, Aileen M Echiverri-Cohen2, Iris Ka-Yi Chat1, Susan Y Bookheimer2, Robin Nusslock1, Michelle G Craske2, Richard E Zinbarg1,3.   

Abstract

Individual differences in one's propensity to engage the behavioral activation system (BAS) and behavioral inhibition system (BIS) have primarily been studied with Caver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scale. Whereas, Carver and White identified the BIS as a unidimensional scale, they identified three separable BAS group factors - drive, fun seeking, and reward responsiveness -which Carver urged against combining into a BAS total score. Despite this, a BAS total score has been used extensively although researchers have yet to test whether a BAS general factor exists and, if so, whether a BAS total score can be interpreted as primarily being a measure of the general factor. The current study observed that the best fitting BAS factor model of those we tested was a hierarchical model with three group facets and a general factor. This model was largely invariant across both sex and race/ethnicity. We show, for the first time, that a general factor accounts for the majority of the variance in BAS total scores. Due to the superior fit of the hierarchical model and variance accounted for by the general factor, we conclude that researchers are psychometrically justified in using a BAS total score.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30853731      PMCID: PMC6402348          DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Res Pers        ISSN: 0092-6566


  37 in total

1.  Meta-analyses of prospective studies on coronary heart disease, type A personality, and hostility.

Authors:  M Myrtek
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 2.  "Stress" and coronary heart disease: psychosocial risk factors.

Authors:  Stephen J Bunker; David M Colquhoun; Murray D Esler; Ian B Hickie; David Hunt; V Michael Jelinek; Brian F Oldenburg; Hedley G Peach; Denise Ruth; Christopher C Tennant; Andrew M Tonkin
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Frontal EEG asymmetry and the behavioral activation and inhibition systems.

Authors:  James A Coan; John J B Allen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Association of specific overt behavior pattern with blood and cardiovascular findings; blood cholesterol level, blood clotting time, incidence of arcus senilis, and clinical coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M FRIEDMAN; R H ROSENMAN
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1959-03-21

Review 5.  Parsing reward.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Coping, mood, and aspects of personality in Spanish translation and evidence of convergence with English versions.

Authors:  R Perczek; C S Carver; A A Price; C Pozo-Kaderman
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2000-02

7.  Multivariate prediction of coronary heart disease during 8.5 year follow-up in the Western Collaborative Group Study.

Authors:  R H Rosenman; R J Brand; R I Sholtz; M Friedman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation scales in a large sample of outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders.

Authors:  Laura Campbell-Sills; Gabrielle I Liverant; Timothy A Brown
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2004-09

Review 9.  Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.

Authors:  Alice H Eagly; Steven J Karau
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Systematic review of prospective cohort studies of psychosocial factors in the etiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Hannah Kuper; Michael Marmot; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  Semin Vasc Med       Date:  2002-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Positive social feedback alters emotional ratings and reward valuation of neutral faces.

Authors:  Katherine S Young; Anni M Hasratian; Christine E Parsons; Richard E Zinbarg; Robin Nusslock; Susan Y Bookheimer; Michelle G Craske
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Goal-striving tendencies moderate the relationship between reward-related brain function and peripheral inflammation.

Authors:  Iris Ka-Yi Chat; Robin Nusslock; Daniel P Moriarity; Corinne P Bart; Naoise Mac Giollabhui; Katherine S F Damme; Ann L Carroll; Gregory E Miller; Lauren B Alloy
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 7.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.