Literature DB >> 31696785

Positive social feedback alters emotional ratings and reward valuation of neutral faces.

Katherine S Young1,2, Anni M Hasratian3, Christine E Parsons4, Richard E Zinbarg5,6, Robin Nusslock5, Susan Y Bookheimer7, Michelle G Craske2.   

Abstract

Evaluation of facial and vocal emotional cues is vital in social interactions but can be highly influenced by characteristics of the observer, such as sex, age, and symptoms of affective disorders. Our evaluations of others' emotional expressions are likely to change as we get to know them and anticipate how they are likely to behave. However, the role of associative learning in the evaluation of social cues remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated whether emotional ratings (valence and arousal) and reward valuation ("liking" and "wanting" measures) of neutral facial expressions can be altered through associative learning. We also examined whether emotional ratings and reward valuation varied with symptoms of anxiety and depression, disorders known to impair socio-affective functioning. Participants (N = 324) were young adults, ranging in scores across dimensions of depression and anxiety symptoms: "general distress" (common to depression and anxiety), "anhedonia-apprehension" (more specific to depression), and "fears" (more specific to anxiety). They rated neutral faces and completed a probabilistic learning task that paired images of neutral faces with positive or negative social feedback. Results demonstrated that pairing neutral faces with positive social feedback increased ratings of arousal, valence, and reward valuation (both "liking" and "wanting"). Pairing neutral faces with negative feedback reduced valence ratings and reduced "wanting," but did not impact arousal ratings or "liking." Symptoms of general distress were associated with negative bias in valence ratings, symptoms of anhedonia-apprehension were associated with reduced "wanting," and symptoms of fears were associated with altered accuracy over trials. Notably, the association between general distress and negative bias was reduced following the associative learning task. This suggests that disrupted evaluation of social cues can be improved through brief training.

Keywords:  Anxiety; depression; emotion; face processing; learning; reward

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31696785      PMCID: PMC8320679          DOI: 10.1177/1747021819890289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  59 in total

Review 1.  Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: A review of audiovisual studies.

Authors:  Thomas Koelewijn; Adelbert Bronkhorst; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-04-27

2.  Developmental Relations Among Behavioral Inhibition, Anxiety, and Attention Biases to Threat and Positive Information.

Authors:  Lauren K White; Kathryn A Degnan; Heather A Henderson; Koraly Pérez-Edgar; Olga L Walker; Tomer Shechner; Ellen Leibenluft; Yair Bar-Haim; Daniel S Pine; Nathan A Fox
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2017-01

3.  Anhedonia in depression: biological mechanisms and computational models.

Authors:  Jessica A Cooper; Amanda R Arulpragasam; Michael T Treadway
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-08

4.  Structure of anxiety and the anxiety disorders: a hierarchical model.

Authors:  R E Zinbarg; D H Barlow
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1996-05

5.  By carrot or by stick: cognitive reinforcement learning in parkinsonism.

Authors:  Michael J Frank; Lauren C Seeberger; Randall C O'reilly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Identifying differences in biased affective information processing in major depression.

Authors:  Jackie K Gollan; Heather T Pane; Michael S McCloskey; Emil F Coccaro
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Reduced hedonic capacity in major depressive disorder: evidence from a probabilistic reward task.

Authors:  Diego A Pizzagalli; Dan Iosifescu; Lindsay A Hallett; Kyle G Ratner; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 4.791

8.  Perceiving emotions in neutral faces: expression processing is biased by affective person knowledge.

Authors:  Franziska Suess; Milena Rabovsky; Rasha Abdel Rahman
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Reconceptualizing anhedonia: novel perspectives on balancing the pleasure networks in the human brain.

Authors:  Kristine Rømer Thomsen; Peter C Whybrow; Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Worth the 'EEfRT'? The effort expenditure for rewards task as an objective measure of motivation and anhedonia.

Authors:  Michael T Treadway; Joshua W Buckholtz; Ashley N Schwartzman; Warren E Lambert; David H Zald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Individual differences in threat and reward neural circuitry activation: Testing dimensional models of early adversity, anxiety and depression.

Authors:  Katherine S Young; Camilla Ward; Meghan Vinograd; Kelly Chen; Susan Y Bookheimer; Robin Nusslock; Richard E Zinbarg; Michelle G Craske
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.698

2.  miRNA and mRNA Profiles in Ventral Tegmental Area From Juvenile Mice With Companion Communication of Improving CUMS-Induced Depression-Like Behaviors.

Authors:  Zhenhua Song; Jin-Hui Wang
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.